您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(工学版)》

山东大学学报(工学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 113-119.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2016.137

• • 上一篇    下一篇

北盘江新型空腹式连续刚构桥角隅节点模型试验研究

彭元诚1,董旭2*,梁娜3,邓振全2   

  1. 1. 中交第二公路勘察设计研究院有限公司, 湖北 武汉 430057;2.山东大学岩土与结构工程研究中心, 山东 济南 250061;3.山东省质量技术监督局信息中心, 山东 济南 250002
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-26 出版日期:2016-12-20 发布日期:2016-04-26
  • 通讯作者: 董旭(1983— ),男,山东济南人,博士研究生,主要研究方向为结构分析及安全性评估研究.E-mail:dongxu512@126.com E-mail:pengyc@vip.163.com
  • 作者简介:彭元诚(1964— ),男,湖北汉阳人,高级工程师,博士,主要研究方向为大跨桥梁设计.E-mail:pengyc@vip.163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)资助项目(2010CB732002);国家自然科学基金资助项目(51379113);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20120131110031)

Model test of the Beipan River's new open-web continuous rigid frame bridge corner node

PENG Yuancheng1, DONG Xu2*, LIANG Na3, DENG Zhenquan2   

  1. 1. CCCC Second Highway Consultant Co. LTD, Wuhan 430057, Hubei, China;
    2. Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, Shandong, China;
    3. Shandong Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision Information Center, Jinan 250002, Shandong, China
  • Received:2016-04-26 Online:2016-12-20 Published:2016-04-26

摘要: 为研究空腹式连续刚构桥新型桥梁结构角隅节点的力学性能,设计了角隅节点1∶5缩尺模型试验梁。通过静力荷载试验,利用静态采集仪及挠度计,测试角隅节点模型梁悬臂加载状态下的应变和挠度。建立模型梁有限元空间数值模型,并将有限元数值计算结果与试验数据进行对比分析。研究结果表明:空腹式连续刚构桥角隅节点具有区别于传统斜腿刚构桥角隅节点的力学性能,其顶板顺桥向基本受压应力作用;角隅节点区域局部应力较高,应加强此部位设计;剪力滞效应也同样存在于角隅节点部位;数值模拟结果与试验结果基本一致。本研究进一步揭示了空腹式连续刚构桥角隅节点力学性能,验证了数值模拟的可行性,为今后此类该桥型角隅节点设计提供了借鉴。

关键词: 空腹式连续刚构, 力学性能, 角隅节点, 试验研究, 数值模拟, 桥梁工程

Abstract: In order to investigate mechanical performances of open-web continuous rigid frame bridge corner node, 1∶5 scaled model test girder was designed. Through the static load test, the static data acquisition instrument and deflection measurement sensors were used to measure the strain and deflection of model test girders under cantilever state. The finite element analysis(FEA)numerical model of test girder had been conducted, and numerical results were compared with test results. The results showed that, the corner nodes of open-web continuous rigid frame bridge had mechanical properties that were different from those of conventional slant-legged rigid frame bridge. The longitudinal top plates of model girder were subjected to pressure stress. Corner node region was under so high local stress that must be strengthened during design process. Shear lag effect also existed in the corner node model. Numerical simulation results were basically in accord with test data. This research revealed the mechanical performances of open-web continuous rigid frame bridge corner node, and verified the feasibility of numerical simulation, and provided a theoretical guild for same 山 东 大 学 学 报 (工 学 版)第46卷 - 第6期彭元诚,等:北盘江新型空腹式连续刚构桥角隅节点模型试验研究 \=-type bridge corner node design.

Key words: bridge engineering, open-web continuous rigid-frame, mechanical performances, corner node, experimental research, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • U448.23
[1] YOSHIKAWA M, HAYASHI H, KAWAKITA S, et al. Construction of Benten viaduct, rigid-frame bridge with seismic isolators at the foot of piers[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2000, 22(1):39-46.
[2] 徐向峰, 赵香萍, 张峰, 等. 重载铁路连续刚构桥徐变精细化数值分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(4):69-74. XU Xiangfeng, ZHAO Xiangping, ZHANG Feng, et al. Refined analysis of creep effect for heavy haul railway continuous rigid frame bridge[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2015, 45(4):69-74.
[3] 石雄伟, 刘海鹏, 周勇军, 等. 双薄壁墩间距对连续刚构桥地震响应的影响[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2010, 10(3): 35-40. SHI Xiongwei, LIU Haipeng, ZHOU Yongjun, et al. Effect of double-thin-wall distance on seismic response of continuous rigid frame bridge[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2010, 10(3):35-40.
[4] 宗周红, 高铭霖, 夏樟华. 基于健康监测的连续刚构桥有限元模型确认(I):基于响应面法的有限元模型修正[J]. 土木工程学报, 2011, 44(2): 90-98. ZONG Zhouhong, GAO Minglin, XIA Zhanghua. Finite element model validation of the continuous rigid frame bridge based on structural health monitoring Part I: FE model updating based on the response surface method[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 44(2):90-98.
[5] 郭健, 刘世忠,孙炳楠. 大跨度预应力斜腿刚构桥的结点应力分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2002, 15(1):78-81. GUO Jian, LIU Shizhong, SUN Bingnan. Joints stress analysis of a prestressed-concrete slant-legged rigid frame bridge[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2002, 15(1):78-81.
[6] 勾红叶, 蒲黔辉, 施洲. 大跨度V形刚构拱组合桥V形墩梁节点模型试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2010, 43(3): 99-105. GOU Hongye, PU Qianhui, SHI Zhou. Model test for the V-shape pier-girder joint of long-span V-shape rigid frame composite arch bridges[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010, 43(3):99-105.
[7] 宗昕, 彭元诚, 吴游宇, 等. 北盘江特大桥结构设计[J]. 公路, 2013, 8(8): 22-26. ZONG Xin, PENG Yuancheng, WU Youyi, et al. Structural design of Beipan river bridge[J]. Highway, 2013, 8(8):22-26.
[8] 杨书杨. 新型空腹式刚构桥与普通刚构桥的对比分析[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2013:19-46. YANG Shuyang. Comparison of open-web and ordinary rigid frame bridge[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science & Technology, 2013:19-46.
[9] 卢斌. 空腹式连续刚构桥静动力学特性[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2014. LU Bin. The performance of opened-web continuous rigid frame bridge[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2014.
[10] 卢斌, 王凯华, 李高超, 等. 设计参数对空腹式连续刚构桥关键截面内力的影响[J]. 公路交通科技, 2014, 31(12): 73-77. LU Bin, WANG Kaihua, LI Gaochao, et al. Influence of design parameters on key section internal force in open-web continuous rigid frame bridge[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2014, 31(12):73-77.
[11] 韩洪举, 黄坤全. 290 m空腹式刚构桥三角区施工技术[J]. 桥梁建设, 2011(3):81-84. HAN Hongju, HUANG Kunquan. Construction techniques for triangle area of a 290 m span open-web continuous rigid-frame bridge[J]. Bridge Construction, 2011(3):81-84.
[12] 黄坤全, 彭旭民. 空腹式连续刚构桥施工过程受力特性分析[J]. 桥梁建设, 2011(3):40-43. HUANG Kunquan, PENG Xumin. Analysis of mechanical behavior of a presressed concrete open-web continuous rigid-frame bridge in construction process[J]. Bridge Construction, 2011(3):40-43.
[13] 王立鹏, 巩思锋. 钢筋混凝土梁电化学锈蚀及受弯承载力试验研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(2): 113-117. WANG Lipeng, GONG Sifeng. Study of electrochemical corrosion and bearing capacity of corroded reinforced concrete beams[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2009, 39(2): 113-117.
[14] 管延华, 蒋斌松, 宋修广, 等. FRP—螺栓联合加固RC梁受剪承载能力试验研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(2): 82-87. GUAN Yanhua, JIANG Binsong, SONG Xiuguang, et al. Experimental study on RC beams strengthened in shear with hybrid bonding of FRP[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2010, 40(2): 82-87.
[15] SHAKYA K, WATANABEB K, MATSUMOTOA K, et al. Application of steel fibers in beam—column joints of rigid-framed railway bridges to reduce longitudinal and shear rebars[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 27: 482-489.
[16] 王海源, 章龙, 张乐文, 等. 预防连续箱梁施工裂缝的温度监测与有限元分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2011, 41(3): 82-90. WANG Haiyuan, ZHANG Long, ZHANG Lewen, et al. Temperature monitoring and finite element analysis of preventing construction cracks in a continuous box girder[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2011, 41(3): 82-90.
[17] KALANTARI A, AMJADIAN M. An approximate method for dynamic analysis of skewed highway bridges with continuous rigid deck[J]. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32(9): 2850-2860.
[18] GIL B, BAYO E. An alternative design for internal and external semi-rigid composite joints part I: experimental research[J]. Journal of Engineering Structures, 2008, 30(1): 218-231.
[19] GIL B, BAYO E. An alternative design for internal and external semi-rigid composite joints part II: finite element modelling and analytical study[J]. Journal of Engineering Structures, 2008, 30(1): 232-246.
[20] 王恩东. 箱梁桥桥面铺装受力特性研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(2):71-76. WANG Endong. Strength characteristic analysis of box girder bridge pavement[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2008, 38(2):71-76.
[21] 王连广, 慕光波. 预应力空腹式钢骨混凝土梁受弯性能研究[J]. 工程力学, 2011, 28(8):113-118. WANG Lianguang, MU Guangbo. Research on bending performance of prestressed lattice type steel reinforced concrete beam[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 28(8):113-118.
[22] 中华人民共和国住房与城乡建设部. GB 50010—2010 混凝土结构设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
[1] 曹芙波,肖胜先,王晨霞,郜德龙,李敦,苏天,秦士杰,王宇飞. 基于熵权TOPSIS的再生砖混水稳材料多指标综合性能评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2025, 55(6): 151-162.
[2] 刘启明,王文辉,潘英楠,高要辉,郑程程,贺鹏. 厚度缺陷对初支结构安全性的影响及风险评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2025, 55(5): 165-178.
[3] 薛刚,刘秋雨,董伟,李京军. 冲击荷载下钢渣细骨料混凝土力学特性及本构关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2025, 55(4): 108-117.
[4] 薛刚,邬松,董伟. 碳化钢渣细骨料混凝土本构关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2025, 55(2): 97-105.
[5] 义扬,肖映雄,余科. 任意多边形骨料混凝土细观模型的建立与数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2025, 55(1): 97-107.
[6] 陈文举, 陈俐企, 包春波, 朱启银, 惠冰, 庄培芝. 循环管道加热桥面融雪效能数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(6): 100-110.
[7] 马川义,冯豪杰,蒋红光,侯天新,姚占勇,杨为民. 吸水土工布对路基湿度控制效果的数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(4): 141-149.
[8] 罗靓,晏宇翔,吕辉,张成明. 异形钢管混凝土轴压短柱力学性能[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(3): 103-114.
[9] 韩超,王彤,陈德文,孙恩赐,李平,吴则祥,周冲,庄培芝. 基于耦合欧拉-拉格朗日方法的砂土中静压桩挤土效应数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(2): 143-152.
[10] 王钰鑫,吕思忠,姚望,林春金,张明,李召峰,张健,王衍升. 粉质黏土地层桩侧劈裂注浆参数设计与效果评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(6): 70-81.
[11] 张亚平,马唯婧,张宸硕,肖辉,张一鸣. 基于图像识别与CAE仿真技术的输变电塔一体化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(6): 122-130.
[12] 潘旭东,李鸿钊,郭焱旭,刘人太,何万里. 海洋环境下注浆加固体的力学性能演化[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(5): 112-120.
[13] 宋洋,罗志恒,张波,张宇,朱敏. 裂隙位置对类岩体短柱单轴压缩破坏形态影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(5): 121-131.
[14] 王心泉,王智猛,牛犇,蒋恒,冯春. 8度地震烈度区新民隧道出口处边坡的稳定性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(3): 23-30.
[15] 王晓明,朱传超,许航,贺耀北,韩昭,李兆辉,黄春杨. 无内腹板式钢索塔锚固区的力学性能分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(3): 50-59.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王素玉,艾兴,赵军,李作丽,刘增文 . 高速立铣3Cr2Mo模具钢切削力建模及预测[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(1): 1 -5 .
[2] 张永花,王安玲,刘福平 . 低频非均匀电磁波在导电界面的反射相角[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 22 -25 .
[3] 李 侃 . 嵌入式相贯线焊接控制系统开发与实现[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(4): 37 -41 .
[4] 孔祥臻,刘延俊,王勇,赵秀华 . 气动比例阀的死区补偿与仿真[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(1): 99 -102 .
[5] 来翔 . 用胞映射方法讨论一类MKdV方程[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(1): 87 -92 .
[6] 余嘉元1 , 田金亭1 , 朱强忠2 . 计算智能在心理学中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 1 -5 .
[7] 陈瑞,李红伟,田靖. 磁极数对径向磁轴承承载力的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 81 -85 .
[8] 李可,刘常春,李同磊 . 一种改进的最大互信息医学图像配准算法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 107 -110 .
[9] 季涛,高旭,孙同景,薛永端,徐丙垠 . 铁路10 kV自闭/贯通线路故障行波特征分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 111 -116 .
[10] 浦剑1 ,张军平1 ,黄华2 . 超分辨率算法研究综述[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 27 -32 .