您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（工学版）》

山东大学学报 (工学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (5): 165-178.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2024.256

• 土木工程 • 上一篇    

厚度缺陷对初支结构安全性的影响及风险评价

刘启明1,王文辉1,潘英楠1,高要辉2,郑程程3,贺鹏3*   

  1. 1.浙江磐安抽水蓄能有限公司, 浙江 金华 322300;2.中国电建集团华东勘测设计研究院有限公司, 浙江 杭州 310014;3.山东科技大学土木工程与建筑学院, 山东 青岛 266590
  • 发布日期:2025-10-17
  • 作者简介:刘启明(1987— ),男,湖北鄂州人,高级工程师,主要研究方向为水利水电开发与应用. E-mail:429477163@qq.com. *通信作者简介:贺鹏(1988— ),男,山东莱芜人,副教授,硕士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为隧道与地下工程. E-mail:hepenghank@163.com.
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(51909150);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2022M711962);国网新源集团有限公司科技资助项目(SGXYKJ-2021-141)

Influence of thickness defects on the stability of the primary support structure and risk assessment

LIU Qiming1, WANG Wenhui1, PAN Yingnan1, GAO Yaohui2, ZHENG Chengcheng3, HE Peng3*   

  1. LIU Qiming1, WANG Wenhui1, PAN Yingnan1, GAO Yaohui2, ZHENG Chengcheng3, HE Peng3*(1. Zhejiang Pan'an Pumped Storage Co., Ltd., Jinhua 322300, Zhejiang, China;
    2. Power China Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited, Hangzhou 310014, Zhejiang, China;
    3. Institute of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, Shandong, China
  • Published:2025-10-17

PDF (PC)

36

摘要： 为探究混凝土厚度缺陷对初支结构造成的损害,以实际工程为背景,考虑厚度缺陷发生的具体位置与范围,对其在隧道中的分布特征进行统计。运用有限元数值模拟,对不同厚度缺陷类型下初支结构的力学特征进行深入分析;采用CRITIC(criteria importance through intercrieria correlation)权重分析法,对影响初支结构安全性的缺陷跨度与位置等风险指标进行综合评价,确定了各指标对结构安全性的影响程度。研究表明,缺陷出现在拱顶位置或缺陷跨度大于25°时,对初支结构安全性影响最大。研究结果可为同类隧道的病害防治提供借鉴和参考。

关键词: 初支结构, 厚度缺陷, 现场检测, 数值模拟, 权重分析

Abstract: To investigate the damage that thickness defects caused to the initial support structure, this study adopted an actual engineering background, considered the specific locations and extents of thickness defects, and conducted a statistical analysis of their distribution characteristics within the tunnel. Finite element numerical simulation was employed to deeply analyze the mechanical characteristics of the initial support structure under different types of thickness defects. Additionally, the CRITIC(criteria importance through intercriteria correlation)method was used to comprehensively evaluate various risk indicators(such as the span and location of defects)affecting the safety of the initial support structure, determining the degree of influence of each indicator on structural safety. Research indicated that either located at the vault position or spanning more than 25 degrees exerted the most significant impact on the safety of the primary support structure. The research results could provide references and insights for the prevention and control of similar tunnel diseases.

Key words: primary support structure, thickness defects, field inspection, numerical simulation, weight analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU921
[1] MEGUID M A, DANG H K. The effect of erosion voids on existing tunnel linings[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology Incorporating Trenchless Technology Research, 2008, 24(3):278-286.
[2] WANG J F, HUANG H W, XIE X Y, et al. Void-induced liner deformation and stress redistribution[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology Incorporating Trenchless Technology Research, 2014, 40: 263-276.
[3] 张志刚, 陈佳, 姬海, 等. 东欧公路隧道复合式衬砌结构设计与实践[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2020, 16(增刊1): 127-136. ZHANG Zhigang, CHEN Jia, JI Hai, et al. Design and practice of composite lining structure on road tunnelin Eastern Europe[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2020, 16(Suppl.1): 127-136.
[4] 张顶立. 隧道及地下工程的基本问题及其研究进展[J]. 力学学报, 2017, 49(1): 3-21. ZHANG Dingli. Essential issues and their research progress in tunnel and underground engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2017, 49(1): 3-21.
[5] ZHANG X, SU J, XU Y J, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation the effects of insufficient concrete thickness on the damage behaviour of multi-arch tunnels[J]. Structures, 2021, 33: 2628-2638.
[6] 宫艳萍. 衬砌厚度不足对隧道结构安全性影响研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2019. GONG Yanping. Study on the tunnel structure safety under the impact of the lining thickness deficiency[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2019.
[7] LU W, SUN H B, ALEJANO L, et al. Study on support characteristic curve of primary support structures in underground excavation considering bond-slip behavior[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2021, 24(3): 1-12.
[8] 剧仲林. 直接弹性抗力法及其在隧道初期支护结构计算中的应用[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41(3): 372-387. JU Zhonglin. Direct elastic resistance method and its application to calculation of primary support structure of tunnel[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2021, 41(3): 372-387.
[9] 潘凯锋. 观音阁水库输水工程软岩隧洞初期支护厚度优化分析[J]. 东北水利水电, 2019, 37(7): 34-37. PAN Kaifeng.Optimization analysis of initial support thickness of soft rock tunnelfor water conveyance project of Guanyinge reservoir[J]. Water Resources & Hydropower of Northeast, 2019, 37(7): 34-37.
[10] 孙润方, 杨凯, 晏启祥, 等. 不同喷射混凝土厚度对隧道围岩变形影响分析[J]. 四川建筑, 2020, 40(6): 115-116. SUN Runfang, YANG Kai, YAN Qixiang, et al. Analysis of the influence of different shotcrete thicknesses on the deformation of tunnel surrounding rock[J].Sichuan Architecture, 2020, 40(6): 115-116.
[11] 韩荣杰, 欧湘萍, 闫志濠, 等. 初期支护参数对断层破碎带隧道围岩稳定性的影响研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2021, 45(2): 330-335. HAN Rongjie, OU Xiangping, YAN Zhihao, et al. Study on the influence of initial support parameters on the stability of tunnel surrounding rock in fault fracture zone[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Transportation Science & Engineering), 2021, 45(2): 330-335.
[12] 吕鸿, 王建. 隧道爆破冲击对不同厚度初期支护mises应力的影响[J]. 公路, 2016, 61(10): 268-270. LÜ Hong, WANG Jian. Analysis of the influence of tunnel blasting impact on mises stress of initial support with different thicknesses[J]. Highway, 2016, 61(10): 268-270.
[13] 李德军, 于程硕, 谢东武. 大跨度城市山岭隧道初期支护参数优化研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020, 57(增刊1): 387-393. LI Dejun, YU Chengshuo, XIE Dongwu. Optimization of initial support parameters of large-span urban mountain tunnels[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2020, 57(Suppl.1): 387-393.
[14] ZHANG M M, ZHANG X D. Application of ground penetrating radar in tunnel concrete lining quality detection[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2015, 3696: 1065-1069.
[15] FENG D S, WANG X, ZHANG B. Improving reconstruction of tunnel lining defects from ground-penetrating radar profiles by multi-scale inversion and bi-parametric full-waveform inversion[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2019, 41: 100931.
[16] 胡群芳, 周博文, 王飞, 等. 基于模糊层次分析的公路隧道结构安全评估技术[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2018, 27(4): 41-49. HU Qunfang, ZHOU Bowen, WANG Fei, et al. Structural safety assessment technology of long highway tunnel based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2018, 27(4): 41-49.
[17] 周兵, 王传生, 刘芳亮, 等. 城市交通隧道运营安全风险评估模型及管理系统研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2021, 38(1): 97-103. ZHOU Bing, WANG Chuansheng, LIU Fangliang, et al. Study on risk assessment model and management system for urban traffic tunnel operation safety[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2021, 38(1): 97-103.
[18] SOUSA R L, EINSTEIN H H. Risk analysis during tunnel construction using Bayesian networks: Porto Metro case study[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology Incorporating Trenchless Technology Research, 2012, 27(1):86-100.
[19] 吴贤国, 刘茜, 陈虹宇, 等. 基于模糊贝叶斯证据理论的盾构下穿既有隧道安全风险评价[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41(5): 713-720. WU Xianguo, LIU Xi, CHEN Hongyu, et al. Preassessment of safety risk of shield tunneling underneath existing tunnel based on fuzzy Bayesian networks and evidence theory[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2021, 41(5): 713-720.
[20] SUN J J, SHI L, SHEN Y, et al. Research on the safety risk management of the operation of the long river-crossing tunnels based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process evaluation method[C] // Processdings of CICTP 2021. Xi'an, China: ASCE, 2021: 1118-1129.
[21] ZHOU B, WANG C S, LIU F L, et al. Whole risk assessment system and management system of urban road tunnel operation stage[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development(English Edition), 2020, 14(1): 94-101.
[22] LIN C J, ZHANG M, LI L P, et al. Risk assessment of tunnel construction based on improved cloud model[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2020, 34(3): 1-13.
[23] XIAO M W, CHANG D H, LI J Z. Study on multi-level safety risk assessment of two-line three-step construction of long-span shallow buried and hidden excavation tunnel[C] //Processdings of ICCREM 2021.Beijing, China: ASCE, 2021: 73-84.
[24] 中华人民共和国水利部. 工程岩体分级标准:GB/T50218—2014[ S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2014.
[1] 义扬,肖映雄,余科. 任意多边形骨料混凝土细观模型的建立与数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2025, 55(1): 97-107.
[2] 陈文举, 陈俐企, 包春波, 朱启银, 惠冰, 庄培芝. 循环管道加热桥面融雪效能数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(6): 100-110.
[3] 马川义,冯豪杰,蒋红光,侯天新,姚占勇,杨为民. 吸水土工布对路基湿度控制效果的数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(4): 141-149.
[4] 韩超,王彤,陈德文,孙恩赐,李平,吴则祥,周冲,庄培芝. 基于耦合欧拉-拉格朗日方法的砂土中静压桩挤土效应数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(2): 143-152.
[5] 王钰鑫,吕思忠,姚望,林春金,张明,李召峰,张健,王衍升. 粉质黏土地层桩侧劈裂注浆参数设计与效果评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(6): 70-81.
[6] 张亚平,马唯婧,张宸硕,肖辉,张一鸣. 基于图像识别与CAE仿真技术的输变电塔一体化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(6): 122-130.
[7] 宋洋,罗志恒,张波,张宇,朱敏. 裂隙位置对类岩体短柱单轴压缩破坏形态影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(5): 121-131.
[8] 王心泉,王智猛,牛犇,蒋恒,冯春. 8度地震烈度区新民隧道出口处边坡的稳定性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(3): 23-30.
[9] 孙杰,张宏博,程钰,刘羽,张洪波,刘志鲲. 基于TDA填料的废旧轮胎条带加筋砂土边坡承载特性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(1): 49-59.
[10] 牛犇,张新伟,周玉,李婧,徐兴全,张一鸣. 基于连续-非连续元降雨工况三维边坡稳定性分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(1): 92-99.
[11] 郭鹏宁,刘巍,袁浩,冯硕,王延刚. 基于微元离散模型的螺旋挤压脱水效率分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(1): 114-121.
[12] 张一鸣,李赟鹏,李婧,丛俊余. 孔隙裂隙介质多场耦合数值计算进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(6): 63-78.
[13] 郑卫琴,许杰,孙杰,武科. 复合地层TBM隧道管片受力特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(4): 210-213.
[14] 章清涛,刘晓威,高健,孙玉海,闫庆亮,刘源,王昊. 坡顶荷载作用下废旧轮胎条带加筋边坡承载特性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(3): 70-79.
[15] 刘舫辰,石岩,李元鲁,王湛,杜文静,季万祥. 用于燃煤电厂的低温省煤器前烟道流动及磨损特性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(3): 100-108.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 侃 . 嵌入式相贯线焊接控制系统开发与实现[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(4): 37 -41 .
[2] 来翔 . 用胞映射方法讨论一类MKdV方程[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(1): 87 -92 .
[3] 余嘉元1 , 田金亭1 , 朱强忠2 . 计算智能在心理学中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 1 -5 .
[4] 陈瑞,李红伟,田靖. 磁极数对径向磁轴承承载力的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 81 -85 .
[5] 王波,王宁生 . 机电装配体拆卸序列的自动生成及组合优化[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 52 -57 .
[6] 张英,郎咏梅,赵玉晓,张鉴达,乔鹏,李善评 . 由EGSB厌氧颗粒污泥培养好氧颗粒污泥的工艺探讨[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(4): 56 -59 .
[7] Yue Khing Toh1 ， XIAO Wendong2 ， XIE Lihua1 . 基于无线传感器网络的分散目标跟踪：实际测试平台的开发应用（英文）[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 50 -56 .
[8] 孙炜伟,王玉振. 考虑饱和的发电机单机无穷大系统有限增益镇定[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 69 -76 .
[9] 孙玉利,李法德,左敦稳,戚美 . 直立分室式流体连续通电加热系统的升温特性[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(6): 19 -23 .
[10] 王勇, 谢玉东.

大流量管道煤气的控制技术研究

[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(2): 70 -74 .
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(工学版)》编辑部　
地址: 济南市山大南路27号（250100）　 电话: 0531-88366735　 E-mail: xbgxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发