您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（工学版）》

山东大学学报 (工学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (4): 61-70.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2020.523

• • 上一篇    下一篇

浅埋偏压隧道进洞施工围岩稳定分析

卢光兆1,周博1,徐锋1,2,上官伟1,王刚2,张书博1*   

  1. 1.中交一航局城市交通工程有限公司, 天津 300457;2.山东科技大学土建学院, 山东 青岛 266590
  • 发布日期:2021-08-18
  • 作者简介:卢光兆(1982— ),男,福建龙岩人,高级工程师,主要研究方向为道路和桥梁施工. E-mail:lugz82@163.com. *通信作者简介:张书博(1993— ),男,山东泰安人,博士研究生,主要研究方向为裂隙岩体剪切力学,隧道工程. E-mail:zhangshubo_1993@sdust.sdu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(52079077,51479108)

Stability analysis and construction mechanics of shallow buried bias tunnel openings

LU Guangzhao1, ZHOU Bo1, XU Feng1,2, SHANGGUAN Wei1, WANG Gang2, ZHANG Shubo1*   

  1. 1. China Communications First Navigation Bureau Urban Traffic Engineering Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300457, China;
    2. School of Civil Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, Shandong, China
  • Published:2021-08-18

PDF (PC)

348

摘要： 针对破碎岩体浅埋偏压隧道围岩稳定性问题和进洞工法的取选,选用ABAQUS有限元软件对广西岭顶隧道分别采用三层台阶法、中隔墙法和双侧壁导坑法施工进行数值模拟研究,分析不同施工方法下围岩及支护结构的应力、应变及塑性区分布变化等情况。结果表明:由于隧道存在明显的浅埋和偏压作用,进洞适宜采用中隔墙法和双侧壁导坑法施工作业,能较好地保证隧道的稳定性。在该工程条件下,中隔墙法对拱顶和地表的沉降变形控制较好,而双侧壁导坑法对拱腰处的变形控制更佳。中隔墙法支护结构的内力和弯矩主要集中在拱顶左侧。双侧壁导坑法支护结构的内力和弯矩左右两侧对称分布,隧道拱顶正上方锚杆受力较小。进洞开挖步距不宜过大,确定每次开挖在2 m以内即可。

关键词: 浅埋偏压, 隧道洞口, 围岩稳定性, 数值模拟, 施工方法

Abstract: In view of the stability of the surrounding rock of the shallow buried unsymmetrical pressure tunnel in broken rock mass and the selection of the tunnel construction method, the ABAQUS finite element software was selected for numerical simulation study to analyze the stress, strain and plastic zone distribution changes of surrounding rock and supporting structure under different construction methods. The results showed that: due to the obvious shallow buried and biased effects of the tunnel, the use of center diaphragm method and the double-side heading method for the entry of the tunnel could better ensure the stability of the tunnel. Under the engineering conditions, center diaphragm method had better control on the settlement and deformation of the vault and the ground surface, while the double-side pilot tunnel method had better control on the deformation of the arch waist. The internal force and bending moment of the support structure of center diaphragm method were mainly concentrated on the left side of the vault. The internal forces and bending moments of the double-side pilot pit support structure were symmetrically distributed on the left and right sides, and the anchor rod directly above the tunnel vault bore less force. The excavation step should not be too large, and each excavation should be within 2 m.

Key words: shallow buried bias, tunnel opening, surrounding rock stability, numerical simulation, construction method

中图分类号: 

  • TU45
[1] 王刚, 张书博, 连莲, 等. 基于零厚度黏聚力单元节理面剪切破坏机理宏细观研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(12): 2224-2232. WANG Gang, ZHANG Shubo, LIAN Lian, et al. Macro-micro study on shear failure mechanism of rock joint based on zero-thickness cohesive element[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(12): 2224-2232.
[2] ZGÜR S, NVER B. Assessment of tunnel portal stability at jointed rock mass: a comparative case study[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2015, 64:72-82.
[3] JIA P, TANG C A. Numerical study on failure mechanism of tunnel in jointed rock mass[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23(5): 500-507.
[4] 吕国仁, 隋斌, 王永进, 等. 浅埋偏压隧道开挖数值模拟及稳定性研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(4): 68-73. LÜ Guoren, SUI Bin, WANG Yongjin, et al. Study on numerical simulation and stability analysis shallow buried tunnel excavation under unsymmetrical pressure[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2013, 43(4): 68-73.
[5] 吕国仁, 张寿龙. 隧道浅埋偏压段超前预测与围岩稳定控制研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2012, 42(5): 102-107. LÜ Guoren, ZHANG shoulong. Research on advanced prediction and surrounding rock stability of shallow buried and unsymmetrical loaded section in tunnel excavation[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2012, 42(5): 102-107.
[6] DAHLO T S, NILSEN B. Stability and rock cover of hard rock subsea tunnels[J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 1994, 9(2): 151-158.
[7] 施成华, 彭立敏, 刘宝琛. 浅埋隧道开挖对地表建筑物的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004(19): 3310-3316. SHI Chenghua, PENG Limin, LIU Baochen. Influence of shallow tunnel excavation on ground surface buildings[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004(19): 3310-3316.
[8] 周玉宏, 赵燕明, 程崇国. 偏压连拱隧道施工过程的优化研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2002(5): 679-683. ZHOU Yuhong, ZHAO Yanming, CHENG Chongguo. Study on optimization of construction process of unsymmetrical pressure double-arch tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2002(5): 679-683.
[9] 张顶立, 王梦恕, 高军, 等. 复杂围岩条件下大跨隧道修建技术研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2003(2): 290-296. ZHANG Dingli, WANG Mengshu, GAO Jun, et al. Construction technique of large-span tunnel under condition of complicated surrounding rocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2003(2): 290-296.
[10] 刘小军, 张永兴, 高世军, 等. 软弱围岩隧道洞口段失稳机制分析与处置技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(7): 2229-2234. LIU Xiaojun, ZHANG Yongxing, GAO Shijun, et al. Mechanism analysis and treatment technique of surrounding rock instability for tunnel portal section in weak surrounding rock[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(7): 2229-2234.
[11] 王国欣,谢雄耀,黄宏伟. 公路隧道洞口滑坡的机制分析及监控预报[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006(2): 268-274. WANG Guoxin, XIE Xiongyao, HUANG Hongwei. Mechanism analysis and monitoring forecast of landslide at road tunnel face[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006(2): 268-274.
[12] 王茜,凌同华,刘唐利,等. 穿越断层破碎带隧道入口段施工数值模拟[J]. 交通科学与工程, 2019, 35(4): 78-84. WANG Qian, LING Tonghua, LIU Tangli, et al. Numerical simulation of construction method of tunnel entrance section throughing fractured fault zone[J]. Journal of Transport Science and Engineering, 2019, 35(4): 78-84.
[13] 李利平,李术才,徐帮树,等. 海底隧道施工设计及其数值优化研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(4): 63-68. LI Liping, LI Shucai, XU Bangshu, et al. Numerical optimization study on the construction of a sub-sea tunnel[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2008, 38(4): 63-68.
[14] JIN Yinfu, ZHU Bingqing, YIN Zhengyu, et al. Three-dimensional numerical analysis of the interaction of two crossing tunnels in soft clay[J]. Underground Space, 2019, 4(4): 310-327.
[15] LI Ziyuan, WANG Liqiong, FENG Bo, et al. Comprehensive collapse investigation and treatment: an engineering case from Qingdao Expressway Tunnel[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020:121879.
[16] ZHANG Shubo, WANG Gang, JIANG Yujing, et al. Study on shear mechanism of bolted jointed rocks experiments and CZM-Based Fem simulations[J]. Applied Science, 2020, 10(1): 62-83.
[17] 费康, 张建伟. ABAQUS在岩土工程中的应用[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2010. FEI Kang, ZHANG Jianwei. Application of ABAQUS in geotechnical engineering[M]. Beijing: China Water and Power Press, 2010.
[18] 徐长节, 朱怀龙, 龙莉波, 等 深基坑隔离桩对坑外既有隧道保护效果分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(1): 119-126. XU Changjie, ZHU Huailong, LONG Libo, et al. Protection effect analysis of isolated piles for deep foundation pit on existing tunnel outside the pit[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 119-126.
[19] 左宇军, 万入祯, 孙文吉斌, 等. 不同开挖工法对含煤系岩层隧道围岩稳定性影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(4): 64-74. ZUO Yujun, WAN Ruzhen, SUN Wenjibin, et al. The influence of different excavation methods on the stability of surrounding rock of tunnel in coal-bearing strata[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(4): 64-74.
[20] 中国铁路总公司. 铁路隧道监控量测技术规程:Q/CR 9218—2015[S]. 北京:中国铁道出版社, 2015.
[21] 郑万坤, 仇玉良, 史宝童, 等. 风积沙隧道施工步距荷载释放与沉降控制研究[J].公路, 2012(1): 222-226. ZHENG Wankun, QIU Yuliang, SHI Baotong,et al. Research on load release and settlement control of aeolian sand tunnel construction steps[J]. Highway, 2012(1): 222-226.
[1] 刘启明,王文辉,潘英楠,高要辉,郑程程,贺鹏. 厚度缺陷对初支结构安全性的影响及风险评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2025, 55(5): 165-178.
[2] 义扬,肖映雄,余科. 任意多边形骨料混凝土细观模型的建立与数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2025, 55(1): 97-107.
[3] 陈文举, 陈俐企, 包春波, 朱启银, 惠冰, 庄培芝. 循环管道加热桥面融雪效能数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(6): 100-110.
[4] 马川义,冯豪杰,蒋红光,侯天新,姚占勇,杨为民. 吸水土工布对路基湿度控制效果的数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(4): 141-149.
[5] 韩超,王彤,陈德文,孙恩赐,李平,吴则祥,周冲,庄培芝. 基于耦合欧拉-拉格朗日方法的砂土中静压桩挤土效应数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(2): 143-152.
[6] 王钰鑫,吕思忠,姚望,林春金,张明,李召峰,张健,王衍升. 粉质黏土地层桩侧劈裂注浆参数设计与效果评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(6): 70-81.
[7] 张亚平,马唯婧,张宸硕,肖辉,张一鸣. 基于图像识别与CAE仿真技术的输变电塔一体化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(6): 122-130.
[8] 宋洋,罗志恒,张波,张宇,朱敏. 裂隙位置对类岩体短柱单轴压缩破坏形态影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(5): 121-131.
[9] 王心泉,王智猛,牛犇,蒋恒,冯春. 8度地震烈度区新民隧道出口处边坡的稳定性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(3): 23-30.
[10] 孙杰,张宏博,程钰,刘羽,张洪波,刘志鲲. 基于TDA填料的废旧轮胎条带加筋砂土边坡承载特性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(1): 49-59.
[11] 牛犇,张新伟,周玉,李婧,徐兴全,张一鸣. 基于连续-非连续元降雨工况三维边坡稳定性分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(1): 92-99.
[12] 郭鹏宁,刘巍,袁浩,冯硕,王延刚. 基于微元离散模型的螺旋挤压脱水效率分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(1): 114-121.
[13] 张一鸣,李赟鹏,李婧,丛俊余. 孔隙裂隙介质多场耦合数值计算进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(6): 63-78.
[14] 郑卫琴,许杰,孙杰,武科. 复合地层TBM隧道管片受力特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(4): 210-213.
[15] 章清涛,刘晓威,高健,孙玉海,闫庆亮,刘源,王昊. 坡顶荷载作用下废旧轮胎条带加筋边坡承载特性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(3): 70-79.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张永花,王安玲,刘福平 . 低频非均匀电磁波在导电界面的反射相角[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 22 -25 .
[2] 李 侃 . 嵌入式相贯线焊接控制系统开发与实现[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(4): 37 -41 .
[3] 施来顺,万忠义 . 新型甜菜碱型沥青乳化剂的合成与性能测试[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(4): 112 -115 .
[4] 孔祥臻,刘延俊,王勇,赵秀华 . 气动比例阀的死区补偿与仿真[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(1): 99 -102 .
[5] 来翔 . 用胞映射方法讨论一类MKdV方程[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(1): 87 -92 .
[6] 余嘉元1 , 田金亭1 , 朱强忠2 . 计算智能在心理学中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 1 -5 .
[7] 陈瑞,李红伟,田靖. 磁极数对径向磁轴承承载力的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 81 -85 .
[8] 王波,王宁生 . 机电装配体拆卸序列的自动生成及组合优化[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 52 -57 .
[9] 季涛,高旭,孙同景,薛永端,徐丙垠 . 铁路10 kV自闭/贯通线路故障行波特征分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 111 -116 .
[10] 秦通,孙丰荣*,王丽梅,王庆浩,李新彩. 基于极大圆盘引导的形状插值实现三维表面重建[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(3): 1 -5 .
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(工学版)》编辑部　
地址: 济南市山大南路27号（250100）　 电话: 0531-88366735　 E-mail: xbgxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发