您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(工学版)》

山东大学学报 (工学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (4): 99-105.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2020.475

• • 上一篇    

风荷载作用下输电塔-线体系不确定性分析

徐震1,张涛2,葛向东2,高峰2,张来仪3,张欣3,田利3*   

  1. 1. 山东电力工程咨询院有限公司, 山东 济南 250013;2. 内蒙古鲁电蒙源电力工程有限公司, 内蒙古 呼和浩特 010020;3. 山东大学土建与水利学院, 山东 济南 250061
  • 发布日期:2021-08-18
  • 作者简介:徐震(1981— ),男,山东济南人,高级工程师,主要研究方向为输电塔设计. E-mail:172103458@qq.com. *通信作者简介:田利(1982— ),男,山东枣庄人,教授,博士,主要研究方向为结构防灾减灾. E-mail:tianli@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    山东大学青年学者未来计划项目(2017WLJH33)

Uncertainty analysis of transmission tower-line system under wind load

XU Zhen1, ZHANG Tao2, GE Xiangdong2, GAO Feng2, ZHANG Laiyi3, ZHANG Xin3, TIAN Li3*   

  1. 1. Shandong Electric Power Engineering Consulting Institute Co., Ltd., Jinan 250013, Shandong, China;
    2. Inner Mongolia Ludian Mengyuan Electric Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Huhhot 010020, Inner Mongolia, China;
    3. School of Civil Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, Shandong, China
  • Published:2021-08-18

摘要: 考虑输电塔-线体系结构参数的不确定性并进行倒塌分析,能够更准确地描述整体结构的倒塌过程。分析输电塔-线体系在风荷载作用下的倒塌过程对结构的材料和几何不确定性参数的敏感性;建立输电塔-线体系的倒塌准则,提出整体损伤指标,通过拉丁超立方抽样法建立关于结构参数的不确定模型,统计输电塔倒塌发生的节间及其倒塌概率。结果表明,6个不确定性参数中令结构倒塌临界风速变化幅度最大的是钢材的屈服强度;考虑结构参数不确定性对输电塔-线体系进行风致易损性计算时,结构的倒塌临界风速提高。

关键词: 输电塔-线体系, 不确定性, 风荷载, 倒塌, 整体损伤指标

Abstract: Considering the parameter uncertainty of tower-line architecture and collapse analysis, the collapse process of the whole structure could be described more accurately. The sensitivity of the collapse process of the transmission tower-line system under wind load to the material and geometric uncertain parameters of the structure was analyzed. The collapse criterion of transmission tower-line system was established, and the global damage index(GDI)was proposed. The uncertain model of structural parameters was established by Latin hypercube sampling method, and the internodes and collapse probability of transmission tower collapse were counted. The results showed that the yield strength of steel was the biggest change in the critical wind speed of structural collapse among the six uncertain parameters. When calculating the wind-induced vulnerability of the transmission tower-line system considering the uncertainty of structural parameters, the critical wind speed of structural collapse increased.

Key words: tower-line system, uncertainty, wind load, collapse, global damage index

中图分类号: 

  • TU355.2
[1] 肖钊. 基于概率盒理论的结构不确定性传播分析[D].长沙: 湖南大学,2016. XIAO Zhao. Uncertainty propagation analysis of structures using probability box theory[D]. Changsha:Hunan University, 2016.
[2] 汪兴龙. 基于数值模拟的轻钢结构厂房风致易损性研究[D].深圳: 哈尔滨工业大学(深圳),2019. WANG Xinglong. Study on wind-induced vulnerability of light steel structure workshops based on numerical simulations[D]. Shenzhen:Harbin Institute of Technology(Shenzhen), 2019.
[3] 陈佳昊. 风荷载作用下输电塔线体系易损性分析[D].合肥: 合肥工业大学,2019. CHEN Jiahao. Vulnerability analysis of transmission tower-line system under wind loading[D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2019.
[4] XIE L, TANG J, XIE Q. Seismic fragility assessment of transmission towers via performance-based analysis[J]. Special Structures, 2014, 31(1):104-108.
[5] PORTER Keith, BECK James L, SHAIKHUTDINOV Rustem V. Investigation of sensitivity of building loss estimates to major uncertain variables for the van nuys testbed[R]. Berkeley, USA: University of California, 2002.
[6] VAL Dimitri, BLJUGER Fiodor, YANKELESVSKY David. Reliability evaluation in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete structures[J]. Structural Safety, 1997, 19(2):203-217.
[7] 中华人民共和国住房与城乡建设部. 混凝土结构设计规范: GB 50010—2010[S].北京: 中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
[8] 吴文朋. 考虑不确定性的钢筋混凝土桥梁地震易损性研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2016. WU Wenpeng. Seismic fragility of reinforced concrete bridges with consideration of various sources of uncer-tainty[D]. Changsha:Hunan University, 2016.
[9] DOLSEK Matjaz. Incremental dynamic analysis with consideration of modeling uncertainties[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2009, 38(6):805-825.
[10] 刘欢, 吴琼莉, PH Cournède. 不同抽样算法对Sobol敏感性分析影响的研究[J]. 数学物理学报, 2018,38(2):372-384. LIU Huan, WU Qiongli, PH Cournède. Research on the effects of different sampling algorithm on Sobol sensitivity analysis[J]. Acta Mathematica Scientia, 2018, 38(2):372-384.
[11] ALEMBAGHERI Mohammad, SEYEDKAZEMI Mohammad. Seismic performance sensitivity and uncer-tainty analysis of gravity dams[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2015, 44(1):41-58.
[12] TIAN Li, MA Ruisheng, PAN Haiyang, et al. Progressive collapse analysis of long-span transmission tower-line system under multi-component seismic excitations[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2017, 20:1920-1932.
[13] TIAN Li, MA Ruisheng, QU Bing. Influence of different criteria for selecting ground motions compatible with IEEE 693 required response spectrum on seismic performance assessment of electricity transmission towers[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 156:337-350.
[14] TIAN Li, PAN Haiyang, MA Rruisheng, et al. Collapse simulations of a long span transmission tower-line system subjected to near-fault ground motions[J]. Earthquakes & Structures, 2017, 13(2):211-220.
[1] 孙东磊,赵龙,秦敬涛,韩学山,杨明,王明强. 基于学习理论的含光储联合系统的输电网双层规划[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2020, 50(4): 90-97.
[2] 崔恒斌,周瑾,董继勇,金超武. V-Gap度量磁悬浮推力轴承系统H控制器设计[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 86-93.
[3] 褚晓东,唐茂森,高旭,刘伟生,贾善杰,李笋. 基于集中式信息系统的主动配电网鲁棒优化调度[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(6): 20-25.
[4] 何东之,张吉沣,赵鹏飞. 不确定性传播算法的MapReduce并行化实现[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2015, 45(5): 22-28.
[5] 张慧慧, 夏建伟. 不确定随机多时滞系统鲁棒随机稳定性分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(1): 54-63.
[6] 赵文忠 史军. 复功率注入空间的电力系统概率安全性指标研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(6): 135-138.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!