您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（工学版）》

山东大学学报 (工学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 15-23.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2019.305

• 机器学习与数据挖掘 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于Gabor特征的乳腺肿瘤MR图像分类识别模型

袁高腾1(),刘毅慧1,*(),黄伟2,胡兵3   

  1. 1. 齐鲁工业大学(山东省科学院)计算机科学与技术学院，山东 济南 250353
    2. 山东省肿瘤防治研究院，山东第一医科大学(山东省医学科学院)放疗科，山东 济南 250117
    3. 济南大学医学与生命科学学院，山东 济南 250022
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-13 出版日期:2020-06-20 发布日期:2020-06-16
  • 通讯作者: 刘毅慧 E-mail:yuangaoteng@163.com;yxl@qlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:袁高腾(1993—)，男，江苏盐城人，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为图像处理与模式识别. E-mail：yuangaoteng@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81773232);国家自然科学基金(81530060);国家自然科学基金(81402538);国家自然科学基金(61375013);山东省自然科学基金(ZR2013FM20)

MR image classification and recognition model of breast cancer based onGabor feature

Gaoteng YUAN1(),Yihui LIU1,*(),Wei HUANG2,Bing HU3   

  1. 1. School of Computer Science and Technology, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 205353, Shandong, China
    2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospitaland Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, Shandong, China
    3. School of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, Shandong, China
  • Received:2019-06-13 Online:2020-06-20 Published:2020-06-16
  • Contact: Yihui LIU E-mail:yuangaoteng@163.com;yxl@qlu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    国家自然科学基金(81773232);国家自然科学基金(81530060);国家自然科学基金(81402538);国家自然科学基金(61375013);山东省自然科学基金(ZR2013FM20)

RichHTML

13

PDF (PC)

584

摘要：

为研究乳腺肿瘤核磁(Magnetic Resonance，MR)图像纹理分析在鉴别乳腺纤维瘤(fibroadenoma of breast, FB)、浸润性导管癌(invasive ductal carcinoma, IDC)和浸润性小叶癌(invasive lobular carcinoma, ILC)中的临床应用价值，选择MR图像的兴趣区域并使用小波变换对MR图像进行分解，结合K-means算法完成对肿瘤区域的勾画。使用Gabor小波从8个方向、5个尺度对兴趣区域滤波，并将肿瘤部位的均值作为特征。对提取的特征进行分析、筛选，得到关键特征。比较支持向量机、贝叶斯、神经网络等不同的分类算法对关键特征进行分类预测，计算分类的准确度、灵敏度和特异性，得到最适用于分类模型的参数设置。乳腺MR图像纹理分析能够区分出常见的三类乳腺肿瘤,预测精度为77.36%。乳腺MR图像在鉴别FB、IDC和ILC方面具有重要的临床价值。

关键词: 乳腺肿瘤, 核磁图像, Gabor, 纹理分析, 机器学习

Abstract:

To investigate the clinical value of breast tumor magnetic resonance (MR) images in differentiating fibroadenoma of breast (FB), invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), the region of interest of MR image was selected and the MR image was decomposed by wavelet transform, and the region of tumor was segmented by K-means algorithm. Gabor wavelet was used to filter the region of interest from 8 directions and 5 scales, and the mean value of the tumor location was taken as the feature. The extracted features were analyzed and the key features were obtained. Different classification algorithms were compared in machine learning, such as support vector machine, Bayesian, and neural network, to classify and predict the key features, and calculate the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of classification, so as to get the most suitable parameter settings for classification model. Texture analysis of breast MR images could distinguish three kinds of common breast tumors, and the prediction accuracy was 77.36%, which showed that MR image had important clinical value in differentiating FB, IDC and ILC.

Key words: breast tumor, MR images, Gabor, texture analysis, machine learning

中图分类号: 

  • TP391

图1

不同类型的乳腺肿瘤MR图像"

图2

乳腺肿瘤MR图像ROI区域"

图3

DWT分解过程"

图4

DWT分解后的子图"

图5

肿瘤部位分割过程"

图6

不同方向下的二维Gabor小波函数"

图7

5个尺度、8个方向Gabor小波滤波图像"

图8

Gabor小波方向为0时三种肿瘤特征均值对比图"

图9

方向为0，尺度为$2\sqrt 2$时三种肿瘤的特征值"

表1

乳腺纤维瘤和浸润性小叶癌预测结果"

关键特征个数 支持向量机 BP神经网络 贝叶斯
正确率 特异性 灵敏度 正确率 特异性 灵敏度 正确率 特异性 灵敏度
3 72.22 88.89 55.56 61.11 44.44 77.78 72.22 55.56 88.88
4 72.22 77.78 66.67 72.22 66.66 77.78 61.10 44.44 77.78
5 83.33 100.00 66.67 61.11 66.67 66.66 72.22 44.44 66.66
6 61.10 33.33 88.88 72.22 88.88 55.56 72.22 77.78 66.66
7 61.10 88.88 22.22 72.22 77.78 66.67 77.77 55.56 100.00
8 44.44 44.44 44.44 66.67 77.78 44.44 44.55 22.22 66.66

表2

乳腺纤维瘤和浸润性导管癌预测结果"

关键特征个数 支持向量机 BP神经网络 贝叶斯
正确率 特异性 灵敏度 正确率 特异性 灵敏度 正确率 特异性 灵敏度
3 97.22 100.00 94.44 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
4 94.44 100.00 88.89 97.22 100.00 94.44 100.00 100.00 100.00
5 100.00 100.00 100.00 83.33 66.67 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
6 100.00 100.00 100.00 97.22 100.00 94.44 100.00 100.00 100.00
7 97.22 100.00 94.44 97.22 100.00 94.44 100.00 100.00 100.00
8 100.00 100.00 100.00 97.22 100.00 94.44 97.22 100.00 94.44

表3

三个类型乳腺肿瘤预测结果"

关键特征个数 支持向量机 BP神经网络 贝叶斯
Q1 QFB QIDC QILC Q1 QFB QIDC QILC Q1 QFB QIDC QILC
3 71.70 66.67 82.14 62.50 69.80 52.94 78.57 75.00 67.92 58.82 71.43 75.00
4 73.58 66.67 85.71 62.50 67.92 47.06 85.71 50.00 71.70 70.59 71.43 75.00
5 77.36 66.57 92.86 62.50 75.47 66.67 85.71 75.00 77.36 70.59 82.14 75.00
6 69.81 64.70 78.57 50.00 67.92 52.94 78.57 62.50 67.92 58.82 75.00 62.50
7 73.58 64.70 85.71 50.00 73.58 58.82 85.71 62.50 71.69 64.71 78.57 62.50
8 71.69 66.67 85.71 50.00 67.92 52.94 78.57 62.50 71.69 58.82 78.57 75.00
1 MCGRATH S E , RING A . Chemotherapy for breast cancer in pregnancy: evidence and guidance for oncologists[J]. Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, 2011, 3 (2): 73- 83.
2 郑莹, 吴春晓, 张敏璐. 乳腺癌在中国的流行状况和疾病特征[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2013, 23 (8): 561- 569.
ZHENG Ying , WU Chunxiao , ZHANG Minlu . The epidemic and characteristics of female breast cancer in China[J]. China Oncology, 2013, 23 (8): 561- 569.
3 李明慧, 柳莉莎. 超声弹性成像评分标准对乳腺良恶性肿块的诊断价值[J]. 肿瘤, 2011, 31 (5): 453- 456.
LI Minghui , LIU Lisha . The diagnostic value of ultrasonic elastography in identifying malignancies of breast diseases[J]. Tumor, 2011, 31 (5): 453- 456.
4 唐玮, 刘剑仑, 杨华伟, 等. 整形保乳术与常规保乳术在早期乳腺癌治疗中的比较分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2016, 43 (6): 235- 239.
TANG Wei , LIU Jianlun , YANG Huawei , et al. Clinical comparative study of oncoplastic and standard breast-conserving surgery in the treatment of early breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2016, 43 (06): 235- 239.
5 O'SULLIVAN T D , LEPROUX A , CHEN J H , et al. Optical imaging correlates with magnetic resonance imaging breast density and reveals composition changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Breast Cancer Research, 2013, 15 (1): 14.
6 SUTTON E J , DASHEVSKY B Z , OH J H , et al. Breast cancer molecular subtype classifier that incorporates MRI features[J]. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2016, 44 (1): 122- 129.
7 刘丽, 赵凌君, 郭承玉, 等. 图像纹理分类方法研究进展和展望[J]. 自动化学报, 2018, 44 (4): 584- 607.
LIU Li , ZHAO Lingjun , GUO Chengyu , et al. Texture classification: state-of-the-art methods and prospects[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2018, 44 (4): 584- 607.
8 ZACHARAKI EI , WANG S , CHAWLA S , et al. Classification of brain tumor type and grade using MRI texture and shape in a machine learning scheme[J]. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2010, 62 (6): 1609- 1618.
9 LIU Yihui , MUFTAH M , DAS T , et al. Classification of MR tumor images based on Gabor wavelet analysis[J]. Journal of Medical & Biological Engineering, 2012, 32 (1): 22- 28.
10 PAN Y, HUANG W, LIN Z, et al. Brain tumor grading based onneural networks and convolutional neural networks[C]// Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, (2015).[S.l.]: [s.n.], 2015: 699-702.
11 KOOI T , LITJENS G , GINNEKEN B V , et al. Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions[J]. Medical Image Analysis, 2017, 35, 303- 312.
12 MERCKEL L G , VERKOOIJEN H M , PETERS N H G M , et al. Theadded diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI at 3.0 T in nonpalpable breast lesions[J]. Plos One, 2014, 9 (4): e94233.
13 MICHAUT M , CHIN S F , MAJEWSKI I , et al. Integration of genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data identifies two biologically distinct subtypes ofinvasive lobular breast cancer[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6, 18517.
14 ULANER G A , GOLDMAN D , GONEN M , et al. Initial results of a prospective clinical trial of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in newly diagnosed invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancers[J]. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2016, 57 (9): 1350.
15 陈波, 张磊. 2017年乳腺癌新辅助治疗进展[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2018, 56 (1): 12- 16.
CHEN Bo , ZHANG Lei . Current perspectives of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer in 2017[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2018, 56 (1): 12- 16.
16 CHEN Yunmei , YE Xiaojing , HUANG Feng , et al. A novel method and fast algorithm for MR image reconstruction with significantly under-sampled data[J]. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2017, 4 (2): 223- 240.
17 ACHARYA U R , MOOKIAH M R , KOH J E , et al. Novel risk index for the identification of age-related macular degeneration using radon transform and DWT features[J]. Computers in Biology & Medicine, 2016, 73 (C): 131- 140.
18 刘慧, 王小宜, 龙学颖. 基于CT图像纹理分析肿瘤异质性的研究进展及应用[J]. 国际医学放射学杂志, 2016, 39 (5): 543- 548.
LIU Hui , WANG Xiaoyi , LONG Xueying . Research progress and clinical application of tumor heterogeneity based on CT texture analysis[J]. International Journal of Medical Radiology, 2016, 39 (5): 543- 548.
19 HUANG Xiuchang, SU Wei. An improved K-means clustering algorithm[C]// World Automation Congress. Hawaii, USA: Journal of Networks, 2014, 9(1): 161-167.
20 范春年, 张福炎. Gabor相位特征的人脸光照不变量提取[J]. 中国图象图形学报, 2012, 17 (5): 676- 681.
FAN Chunnian , ZHANG Fuyan . Illumination invariant extraction on Gabor phase[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2012, 17 (5): 676- 681.
21 KAY S , QUAN D , BO T , et al. Probability density function estimation using the EEF With application to subset/feature selection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2016, 64 (3): 641- 651.
22 侯霄雄, 许新征, 朱炯, 等. 基于AlexNet和集成分类器的乳腺癌计算机辅助诊断方法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49 (2): 74- 79.
HOU Xiaoxiong , XU Xinzheng , ZHU Jiong , et al. Computer aided diagnosis method for breast cancer based on AlexNet and ensemble classifiers[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2019, 49 (2): 74- 79.
[1] 张大鹏,刘雅军,张伟,沈芬,杨建盛. 基于异质集成学习的虚假评论检测[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2020, 50(2): 1-9.
[2] 高铭壑,张莹,张蓉蓉,黄子豪,黄琳焱,李繁菀,张昕,王彦浩. 基于预测数据特征的空气质量预测方法[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2020, 50(2): 91-99.
[3] 刘玉田, 孙润稼, 王洪涛, 顾雪平. 人工智能在电力系统恢复中的应用综述[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2019, 49(5): 1-8.
[4] 李童,马然,郑鸿鹤,安平,胡翔宇. 基于视频统计特征的差错敏感度模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2019, 49(2): 116-121.
[5] 邹启杰,李昊宇,张汝波,裴腾达,刘艳. 自主驾驶的人机交互控制[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2019, 49(2): 23-33.
[6] 张冕,黄颖,梅海艺,郭毓. 基于Kinect的配电作业机器人智能人机交互方法[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2018, 48(5): 103-108.
[7] 刘洋,刘博,王峰. 基于Parameter Server框架的大数据挖掘优化算法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(4): 1-6.
[8] 魏波,张文生,李元香,夏学文,吕敬钦. 一种选择特征的稀疏在线学习算法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(1): 22-27.
[9] 周旺,张晨麟,吴建鑫. 一种基于Hartigan-Wong和Lloyd的定性平衡聚类算法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(5): 37-44.
[10] 孟令恒,丁世飞. 基于单静态图像的深度感知模型[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(3): 37-43.
[11] 刘杰, 杨鹏, 吕文生, 刘阿古达木, 刘俊秀. 基于气象因素的PM2.5质量浓度预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(6): 76-83.
[12] 肖乔,裴继红,王荔霞,龚志成. 基于多通道Gabor滤波模糊融合的遥感图像舰船检测[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2015, 45(5): 29-35.
[13] 郑毅, 朱成璋. 基于深度信念网络的PM2.5预测[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(6): 19-25.
[14] 谢琳1,殷熙尧2,李凡长3,吴佳3. 一种逆归结学习表示[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(4): 46-50.
[15] 何雪英1,2, 秦伟1, 尹义龙1*, 赵联征1,乔昊3. 基于机器学习的视频指纹识别[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2011, 41(4): 29-33.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张永花,王安玲,刘福平 . 低频非均匀电磁波在导电界面的反射相角[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 22 -25 .
[2] 韩雪. 平庄西露天煤矿滑坡灾害远程监测实例分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(4): 116 -120 .
[3] 陈瑞,李红伟,田靖. 磁极数对径向磁轴承承载力的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 81 -85 .
[4] 秦通,孙丰荣*,王丽梅,王庆浩,李新彩. 基于极大圆盘引导的形状插值实现三维表面重建[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(3): 1 -5 .
[5] 刘文亮,朱维红,陈涤,张泓泉. 基于雷达图像的运动目标形态检测及跟踪技术[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(3): 31 -36 .
[6] Yue Khing Toh1 ， XIAO Wendong2 ， XIE Lihua1 . 基于无线传感器网络的分散目标跟踪：实际测试平台的开发应用（英文）[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 50 -56 .
[7] 孙殿柱,朱昌志,李延瑞 . 散乱点云边界特征快速提取算法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 84 -86 .
[8] 关小军,韩振强,申孝民,麻晓飞,刘运腾 . 09CuPTiRE钢动态再结晶的热模拟实验与有限元模拟[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(5): 17 -20 .
[9] 孙玉利,李法德,左敦稳,戚美 . 直立分室式流体连续通电加热系统的升温特性[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(6): 19 -23 .
[10] 孙从征,管从胜,秦敬玉,程川 . 铝合金化学镀镍磷合金结构和性能[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2007, 37(5): 108 -112 .
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(工学版)》编辑部　
地址: 济南市山大南路27号（250100）　 电话: 0531-88366735　 E-mail: xbgxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发