大断面小净距公路隧道施工影响分析

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2018.055

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以佛羊岭隧道工程为研究背景,采用上下台阶法进行施工,以FLAC3D有限元软件为计算平台,建立大断面小净距公路隧道有限元模型,对隧道模型进行数值模拟分析。研究地表沉降、围岩与衬砌结构应力,并提出相应的监控和加固对策。数值分析结果表明:先行隧洞上部地表沉降比后行隧洞大,后行隧洞的施工会增大先行隧洞竖向位移,使先行洞的最大主应力和最小主应力出现不同幅度的增加,隧道衬砌结构应力集中于拱腰至拱脚范围区域,先行洞支护结构对于后行洞开挖起到稳定岩体的作用,后行隧道的开挖会使中夹岩柱出现应力集中,在施工时应注意对隧道围岩采取加固措施。分析结果能够为大断面小净距公路隧道的设计和施工提供科学依据。

关键词: 大断面, 小净距, 公路隧道, 数值模拟, 影响分析

Abstract:

The construction project of Fo Yangling Tunnel was taken as the research background, the construction was carried out by using benching tunneling construction method. The fast Lagrangian analysis of continua 3D (FLAC3D) finite element software was used as the calculation platform to establish the finite element model of tunnel with large section and small clear distance. The tunnel model was numerically simulated and subsidence, stress of surrounding rock and lining structural were analyzed. And the corresponding monitoring and reinforcement measures were put forward. The results of numerical analysis showed that the settlement of the upper part of the advance tunnel was larger than the subsequent tunnel. The construction of the subsequent tunnel increased the vertical displacement of the advance tunnel, which caused the increase of maximum principal stress and the minimum principal stress. The stress of tunnel lining structure was concentrated in the area from arch waist to arch foot. The support structure of advance tunnel played the role of stabilizing rock mass in the excavation of subsequent tunnel, and the excavation of the subsequent tunnel would make the stress concentration of the middle rock. In the construction, attention should be payed to the surrounding rock and reinforcement measures should be taken. The analysis results could provide a scientific basis for the design and construction of large section and small spacing road tunnel.

Key words: large section, small spacing, road tunnel, numerical simulation, impact analysis

中图分类号:

U455

刘明才. 大断面小净距公路隧道施工影响分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2019, 49(4): 78-85.

Mingcai LIU. Impact analysis on construction of large section and small spacing road tunnel[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2019, 49(4): 78-85.

图/表 16

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

表2

图11

图12

图13

表3

参考文献 16

1	张铁柱. 四车道特大断面小净距公路隧道力学响应分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2015, 48 (增刊1): 302- 305.
	ZHANG Tiezhu . Analysis of mechanical response of four-lane small clear spacing highway tunnel with super-large cross-section[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48 (Suppl.1): 302- 305.
2	景银超. 低山重丘区路基U, V形沟填筑施工技术[J]. 施工技术, 2015, 44 (增刊2): 290- 292.
	JING Yinchao . U and V shape grooves filling construction technology in low-mountain multi-hillock embankment[J]. Construction Technology, 2015, 44 (Suppl.2): 290- 292.
3	蒋树屏. 公路隧道工程品质与技术对策[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2017, 54 (4): 1- 12.
	JIANG Shuping . Quality and technical countermeasures in highway tunnel engineering[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2017, 54 (4): 1- 12.
4	周轮, 李术才, 许振浩, 等. 隧道综合超前地质预报技术及其工程应用[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47 (2): 55- 62.
	ZHOU Lun , LI Shucai , XU Zhenhao , et al. Integrated advanced geological prediction technology of tunnel and its engineering application[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2017, 47 (2): 55- 62.
5	KONG X X. Mechanical behavior analysis for parallel small spacing tunnels in a loess region[C]//Proceedings of the Fourth Geo-China International Conference, 2016. Jinan: ASCE, 2016.
6	ZHU M . Analysis on net distance optimization of large section tunnel with small distance[J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University, 2017, 36 (2): 191- 196.
7	SUN S R , LU Y X , ZHANG S H , et al. Research on deformation mechanism of surrounding rock during excavation of large-span shallow-buried double-arch tunnel[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 392, 890- 894. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.392.890
8	张国华, 陈礼彪, 钱师雄, 等. 大断面小净距大帽山隧道现场监控量测及分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31 (2): 489- 496. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.02.026
	ZHANG Guohua , CHEN Libiao , QIAN Shixiong , et al. On-site supervision measure and analysis of Damaoshan Tunnels with large section and small clear-distance[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31 (2): 489- 496. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.02.026
9	夏才初, 龚建伍, 唐颖, 等. 大断面小净距公路隧道现场监测分析研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26 (1): 44- 50. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.01.006
	XIA Caichu , GONG Jianwu , TANG Ying , et al. Study on site monitoring of large-section highway tunnels with small clear spacing[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26 (1): 44- 50. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.01.006
10	刘智勇, 尹登华, 吴学智, 等. 某公路隧道塌方原因分析及处治技术[J]. 路基工程, 2018, (1): 235- 239.
	LIU Zhiyong , YIN Denghua , WU Xuezhi , et al. Analysis of mechanical response of four-lane small clear spacing highway tunnel with super-large cross-section[J]. Subgrade Engineering, 2018, (1): 235- 239.
11	黄伦海, 钱七虎. 公路隧道大断面改扩建施工开挖方案研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2016, 53 (5): 145- 153.
	HUANG Lunhai , QIAN Qihu . Study on excavation schemes for the redevelopment construction of highway tunnels with large sections[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2016, 53 (5): 145- 153.
12	杨凯, 吴顺川, 吴庆良, 等. 并行隧道顺序开挖围岩及衬砌承载行为分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2015, 11 (增刊1): 239- 245.
	YANG Kai , WU Shunchuan , WU Qingliang , et al. Cause analysis of a highway tunnel collapse and the treatment technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2015, 11 (Suppl.1): 239- 245.
13	陆伟, 陈皓, 李小青. 小净距隧道施工工序的数值模拟分析[J]. 公路, 2014, 59 (10): 291- 296.
	LU Wei , CHEN Hao , LI Xiaoqing . Numerical simulation of construction process of tunnel with small clear distance[J]. Highway, 2014, 59 (10): 291- 296.
14	郑宏利. 超小净距大断面隧道原位扩挖CD工法应力变形特性研究[J]. 铁道建筑技术, 2017, (2): 58- 61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4539.2017.02.014
	ZHENG Hongli . Study on stress deformation characteristics of enlarging tunnel with large cross-section and super-small clear distance at initial construction stage by CD method[J]. Railway Construction Technology, 2017, (2): 58- 61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4539.2017.02.014
15	侯瑞彬, 申玉生, 陈明奎, 等. 基于强度折减法的浅埋偏压小净距隧道围岩稳定性分析[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2014, 58 (4): 55- 60.
	HOU Ruibin , SHEN Yusheng , CHEN Mingkui , et al. Analysis on surrounding rock stability of shallowly-buried eccentrically-loaded tunnels with small interval based on strength reduction method[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2014, 58 (4): 55- 60.
16	XIAO J Z , DAI F C , WEI Y Q , et al. Analysis of mechanical behavior in a pipe roof during excavation of a shallow bias tunnel in loose deposits[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75 (4): 293. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-5176-y

相关文章 15

[1]	刘启明,王文辉,潘英楠,高要辉,郑程程,贺鹏. 厚度缺陷对初支结构安全性的影响及风险评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2025, 55(5): 165-178.
[2]	义扬,肖映雄,余科. 任意多边形骨料混凝土细观模型的建立与数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2025, 55(1): 97-107.
[3]	陈文举, 陈俐企, 包春波, 朱启银, 惠冰, 庄培芝. 循环管道加热桥面融雪效能数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(6): 100-110.
[4]	马川义,冯豪杰,蒋红光,侯天新,姚占勇,杨为民. 吸水土工布对路基湿度控制效果的数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(4): 141-149.
[5]	罗彦斌,王思涵,陈建勋,王传武. 考虑中夹岩柱安全储备的深埋小净距隧道围岩压力计算方法[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(3): 81-93.
[6]	韩超,王彤,陈德文,孙恩赐,李平,吴则祥,周冲,庄培芝. 基于耦合欧拉-拉格朗日方法的砂土中静压桩挤土效应数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(2): 143-152.
[7]	王钰鑫,吕思忠,姚望,林春金,张明,李召峰,张健,王衍升. 粉质黏土地层桩侧劈裂注浆参数设计与效果评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(6): 70-81.
[8]	张亚平,马唯婧,张宸硕,肖辉,张一鸣. 基于图像识别与CAE仿真技术的输变电塔一体化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(6): 122-130.
[9]	宋洋,罗志恒,张波,张宇,朱敏. 裂隙位置对类岩体短柱单轴压缩破坏形态影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(5): 121-131.
[10]	刘健,杨浩,崔晓琳. 围压作用下土-结构接触渗流特性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(3): 60-68.
[11]	王心泉,王智猛,牛犇,蒋恒,冯春. 8度地震烈度区新民隧道出口处边坡的稳定性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(3): 23-30.
[12]	孙杰,张宏博,程钰,刘羽,张洪波,刘志鲲. 基于TDA填料的废旧轮胎条带加筋砂土边坡承载特性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(1): 49-59.
[13]	牛犇,张新伟,周玉,李婧,徐兴全,张一鸣. 基于连续-非连续元降雨工况三维边坡稳定性分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(1): 92-99.
[14]	郭鹏宁,刘巍,袁浩,冯硕,王延刚. 基于微元离散模型的螺旋挤压脱水效率分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(1): 114-121.
[15]	张一鸣,李赟鹏,李婧,丛俊余. 孔隙裂隙介质多场耦合数值计算进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(6): 63-78.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

围岩	弹性模量/GPa	泊松比	粘聚力/kPa	摩擦角/(°)	密度/(kg·m^-3)
坡积层	0.41	0.35	20	17.5	1 650
全风化花岗岩	1.80	0.28	26	35.0	1 980
中风化花岗岩	2.50	0.25	30	35.0	2 200
初期支护	24.00	0.17			2 500

MPa
控制点	先行洞最大主应力		后行洞最大主应力	先行洞最小主应力		后行洞最小主应力
控制点	左洞开挖完成	右洞开挖完成	后行洞最大主应力	左洞开挖完成	右洞开挖完成	后行洞最小主应力
A	-0.110	-0.310	-0.127	-1.562	-1.838	-1.395
B	-0.133	-0.326	-0.157	-0.903	-1.302	-0.969
C	-0.122	-0.376	-0.121	-1.244	-1.933	-1.240
D	-0.310	-0.581	-0.450	-1.306	-2.481	-1.584
E	0.107	-0.084	-0.015	-0.277	-0.521	0.426
F	-0.131	-0.332	-0.318	-1.285	-1.574	-1.386

加固措施	超前注浆	长系统锚杆	水平对拉锚杆
适用情况	净距大于1倍跨度	净距大于6 m	净距小于6 m