您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（工学版）》

山东大学学报(工学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2): 53-60.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2017.058

• • 上一篇    下一篇

浅埋软岩段隧道进洞施工变形特征与失稳分析

宋贵杰   

  1. 中铁十四局集团第二工程有限公司, 山东 泰安 271000
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-19 出版日期:2018-04-20 发布日期:2017-02-19
  • 作者简介:宋贵杰(1976— ),男,山东临沂人,高级工程师,硕士,主要研究方向为公路及铁路工程施工.E-mail: 892241068@qq.com

Deformation characteristic and instability analysis for shallow soft rock section during tunnel-entering construction

SONG Guijie   

  1. The 2nd Engineering Co.Ltd, China Railway 14th Bureau Group, Tai'an 271000, Shandong, China
  • Received:2017-02-19 Online:2018-04-20 Published:2017-02-19

PDF (PC)

466

摘要： 为研究隧道开挖过程中浅埋软岩段塌方变形特征,对隧道地质情况进行有效辨识,结合隧道施工过程围岩监测数据,并依据地质雷达探测结果建立三维数值模型并进行数值分析。研究结果表明:在隧道开挖阶段,拱底与拱顶位置均出现明显塑性区,伴随掌子面逐渐靠近围岩破碎区域,塑性区范围逐渐扩大并向拱顶右上方及围岩内部转移,破碎区域应力水平较低且位移显著增大,围岩完整性大大降低;不良地质构造是隧道发生塌方大变形的主要原因,降雨和地表水的入渗劣化围岩力学性质加速了隧道灾害的发生。对于隧道五级围岩浅埋段施工,应加强监控量测分析并及时做出预警,对关键部位开展超前地质预报工作。研究结果可以指导隧道塌方灾害的防治,对于实现隧道信息化施工具有借鉴意义。

关键词: 信息化, 塌方, 超前地质预报, 浅埋隧道, 监控量测, 数值模拟, 大变形

Abstract: For the collapse accident and stability problem of shallow soft rock section during tunnel construction, tunnel geological conditions were effectively identified, and a 3D model were set up for analysis based on the result of geological radar and the monitoring data of surrounding rock. The results showed that a significant plastic deformation zone was formed on the arch and vault during the tunnel excavation process. With the tunnel face gradually close to the broken zone of the surrounding rock, the range of plastic zone was gradually enlarged and transferred to the top right of the vault and its surrounding rock. The stress level was relatively low. The vertical displacement of the broken area increased significantly, and the integrity of the surrounding rock was greatly reduced. The main reason for the large deformation of the tunnel was the poor geological structure and the mechanical properties of the surrounding rock due to rainfall and surface water infiltration accelerated the tunnel disaster. For the construction of the tunnel soft rock section in the five class surrounding rock, analysis of the monitoring should be strengthened and early warning should be made in time, the advance geological forecast should be developed in the key parts. The results of the study could give guide to the prevention and control of the landslide of the tunnel disaster, which was of great significance for tunnel informatization construction.

Key words: informatization construction, monitoring measurement, large deformation, shallow-buried tunnel, numerical simulation, advance geological forecast, collapse accident

中图分类号: 

  • U459.2
[1] 许振浩, 李术才, 李利平, 等. 基于风险动态评估与控制的岩溶隧道施工许可机制[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(11):1715-1725. XU Zhenhao, LI Shucai, LI Liping, et al. Construction permit mechanism of karst tunnels based on dynamic assessment and management of risk[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(11):1715-1725.
[2] 李术才, 周宗青, 李利平, 等. 岩溶隧道突水风险评价理论与方法及工程应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(9):1858-1867. LI Shucai, ZHOU Zongqing, LI Liping, et al. Risk evaluation theory and method of water inrush in karst tunnels and its applications[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(9):1858-1867.
[3] 钱七虎. 地下工程建设安全面临的挑战与对策[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(10):1945-1956. QIAN Qihu. Challenges faced by underground projects construction safety and counter measures[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(10):1945-1956.
[4] 王立忠, 胡亚元, 王百林, 等. 崩塌松散围岩隧道施工稳定分析与监控[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2003, 22(4):589-595. WANG Lizhong, HU Yayuan, WANG Bailin, et al. Stability analysis and monitoring for tunnel in loose soils during construction [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2003, 22(4):589-595.
[5] 王梦恕. 对岩溶地区隧道施工水文地质超前预报的意见[J]. 铁道勘查, 2004(1):7-9, 18. WANG Mengshu. Hydrologic and geological forecast of tunnel construction in the karst district[J]. Railroad Survey, 2004(1):7-9, 18.
[6] 葛颜慧, 李术才, 张庆松, 等. 基于风险评价的岩溶隧道综合超前地质预报技术研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010(7):1124-1130. GE Yanhui, LI Shucai, ZHANG Qingsong, et al. Comprehensive geological prediction based on risk evaluation during tunneling in karst area[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010(7):1124-1130.
[7] 张庆松, 李术才, 孙克国, 等.公路隧道超前地质预报应用现状与技术分析[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2008, 4(4):766-771. ZHANG Qingsong, LI Shucai, SUN Keguo, et al. Analysis and present state of advance geological forecast technology of highway tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2008, 4(4):766-771.
[8] 朱汉华, 杨建辉, 尚岳全. 隧道新奥法原理与发展[J]. 隧道建设, 2008, 28(1):11-14. ZHU Hanhua, YANG Jianhui, SHANG Yuequan. New austrian tunneling method and its development[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2008, 28(1):11-14.
[9] 吕国仁, 隋斌, 王永进,等. 浅埋偏压隧道开挖数值模拟及稳定性研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(4):68-73. LYU Guoren, SUI Bin, WANG Yongjin, et al. Study on numerical simulation and stability analysis shallow buried tunnel excavation under unsymmetrical pressure[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2013, 43(4):68-73.
[10] 石杰红, 王金安. 数值模拟与熵突变综合分析边坡下地下工程围岩稳定性[J]. 金属矿山, 2009(3):14-18. SHI Jiehong, WANG Jin'an. Stability analysis of the rocks surrounding the underground excavation under slope by entropy catastrophe and numerical simulation[J]. Metal Mine, 2009(3):14-18.
[11] 陈秋南, 张永兴, 刘新荣, 等. 隧道塌方区加固后的施工监测与仿真分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 25(1):158-161. CHEN Qiunan, ZHANG Yongxing, LIU Xinrong, et al. In-situ monitoring and fem simulation analysis of consolidation for a collapsed highway tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics & Engineering, 2006, 25(1):158-161.
[12] 王迎超. 山岭隧道塌方机制及防灾方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(11):2376-2376. WANG Yingchao. Collapse mechanism and preventive measures of mountain tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics & Engineering, 2011, 30(11):2376-2376.
[13] 侯亚彬, 陈玉, 周成涛,等. 基于灰色理论的隧道围岩收敛预测[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2012, 49(5):56-59. HOU Yabin, CHEN Yu, ZHOU Chengtao, et al. Grey theory based convergence prediction of surrounding rock[J]. Modern Tunneling Technology, 2012, 49(5):56-59.
[14] 刘春, 易俊, 姜德义, 等. 深埋隧道围岩突变失稳风险预测[J]. 中国矿业, 2008, 17(3):93-95. LIU Chun, YI Jun, JIANG Deyi, et al. Instability forecast and risk evaluation of the surrounding rock masses for deep-lying tunnel[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2008, 17(3):93-95.
[15] 王心飞, 王文广, 刘新荣, 等. 隧道围岩失稳的突变理论分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2008, 4(3):425-430. WANG Xinfei, WANG Wenguang, LIU Xinrong. Mutation theoretical analysis of tunnel surrounding rock instability[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space & Engineering, 2008, 4(3):425-430.
[16] 刘贵应, 刘新喜, 魏新颜. 隧道塌方的尖点灾变模型及应用[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护, 2002, 13(2):59-62. LIU Guiying, LIU Xinxi, WEI Xinyan. A cusp catastrophic model for tunnel caving[J]. Journal of Geological Hazards & Environment Preservation, 2002, 13(2):59-62.
[17] 孙钧, 戚玉亮. 隧道围岩稳定性正算反演分析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(8):2353-2360. SUN Jun, QI Yuliang. Normal calculation-back analysis of surrounding rock stability of subseetunnel[J]. Rock & Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(8):2353-2360.
[18] 丁秀丽, 董志宏, 卢波, 等. 陡倾角沉积岩地层中大型地下厂房开挖围岩变形失稳特征和反馈分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 27(10):2019-2026. DING Xiuli, DONG Zhihong, LU Bo, et al. Deformation characteristics and feedback analysis of surrounding rock of large underground powerhouses excavated in steeply dipped sedimentary rock strata[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(10):2019-2026.
[19] 吕国仁, 张寿龙. 隧道浅埋偏压段超前预测与围岩稳定控制研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2012, 42(5):102-107. LYU Guoren, ZHANG Shoulong. Research on advanced prediction and surrounding rock stability of shallow buried and unsymmetrical loaded section in tunnel excavation[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2012, 42(5):102-107.
[20] 蒋树屏, 赵阳. 复杂地质条件下公路隧道围岩监控量测与非确定性反分析研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(20):3460-3464. JIANG Shuping, ZHAO Yang. Study on monitoring and back analysis for road tunnel with complex geology[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics & Engineering, 2004, 23(20):3460-3464.
[21] 武科, 马明月, 李术才. 付家冲隧道监控量测与稳定性评价[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2012, 8(3):543-549. WU Ke, MA Mingyue, LI Shucai. Monitoring measurement and evaluation of stability in Fujiachong tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space & Engineering, 2012, 8(3):543-549.
[22] 薛翊国, 李术才, 张庆松, 等. 隧道信息化施工地质灾害预警预报技术研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(5):25-30. XUE Yiguo, LI Shucai, ZHANG Qingsong, et al. Prediction and early-warning technology of geological hazards in tunnel informational construction[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2008, 38(5):25-30.
[23] 钟世航,孙宏志,王荣,等.隧道掌子面前方地质预报的现状及发展之路[J].工程地球物理学报, 2007, 4(3):180-185. ZHONG Shihang, SUN Hongzhi, WANG Rong, et al. The present situation of the geological prediction in front of tunnel face and its development [J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics, 2007, 4(3):180-185.
[24] 解东升,石少帅,陈士林,等. 高风险岩溶隧道突水突泥灾害前兆规律与应用研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版),2012,42(5):81-86. XIE Dongsheng, SHI Shaoshuai, CHEN Shilin, et al. The precursor law of inrush of clay and water in a high-risk karst tunnel and its application[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2012, 42(5):81-86.
[25] 张庆松, 许振浩, 李术才, 等. 岩溶隧道综合超前地质预报方法与工程应用[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(4):7-11. ZHANG Qingsong, XU Zhenhao, LI Shucai, et al. Integrated advanced geological prediction methods and engineering application of karst tunnels[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2009, 39(4):7-11.
[26] 曲海锋, 刘志刚, 朱合华. 隧道信息化施工中综合超前地质预报技术[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 25(6):1246-1251. QU Haifeng, LIU Zhigang, ZHU Hehua. Technique of synthetic geologic prediction ahead in tunnel informational construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(6):1246-1251.
[1] 刘启明,王文辉,潘英楠,高要辉,郑程程,贺鹏. 厚度缺陷对初支结构安全性的影响及风险评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2025, 55(5): 165-178.
[2] 义扬,肖映雄,余科. 任意多边形骨料混凝土细观模型的建立与数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2025, 55(1): 97-107.
[3] 陈文举, 陈俐企, 包春波, 朱启银, 惠冰, 庄培芝. 循环管道加热桥面融雪效能数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(6): 100-110.
[4] 马川义,冯豪杰,蒋红光,侯天新,姚占勇,杨为民. 吸水土工布对路基湿度控制效果的数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(4): 141-149.
[5] 韩超,王彤,陈德文,孙恩赐,李平,吴则祥,周冲,庄培芝. 基于耦合欧拉-拉格朗日方法的砂土中静压桩挤土效应数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(2): 143-152.
[6] 王钰鑫,吕思忠,姚望,林春金,张明,李召峰,张健,王衍升. 粉质黏土地层桩侧劈裂注浆参数设计与效果评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(6): 70-81.
[7] 张亚平,马唯婧,张宸硕,肖辉,张一鸣. 基于图像识别与CAE仿真技术的输变电塔一体化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(6): 122-130.
[8] 宋洋,罗志恒,张波,张宇,朱敏. 裂隙位置对类岩体短柱单轴压缩破坏形态影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(5): 121-131.
[9] 王心泉,王智猛,牛犇,蒋恒,冯春. 8度地震烈度区新民隧道出口处边坡的稳定性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(3): 23-30.
[10] 孙杰,张宏博,程钰,刘羽,张洪波,刘志鲲. 基于TDA填料的废旧轮胎条带加筋砂土边坡承载特性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(1): 49-59.
[11] 牛犇,张新伟,周玉,李婧,徐兴全,张一鸣. 基于连续-非连续元降雨工况三维边坡稳定性分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(1): 92-99.
[12] 郭鹏宁,刘巍,袁浩,冯硕,王延刚. 基于微元离散模型的螺旋挤压脱水效率分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(1): 114-121.
[13] 张一鸣,李赟鹏,李婧,丛俊余. 孔隙裂隙介质多场耦合数值计算进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(6): 63-78.
[14] 郑卫琴,许杰,孙杰,武科. 复合地层TBM隧道管片受力特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(4): 210-213.
[15] 章清涛,刘晓威,高健,孙玉海,闫庆亮,刘源,王昊. 坡顶荷载作用下废旧轮胎条带加筋边坡承载特性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(3): 70-79.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙国华,吴耀华,黎伟. 消费税控制策略对供应链系统绩效的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 63 -68 .
[2] 曲延鹏,陈颂英,李春峰,王小鹏,滕书格 . 低压大流量自激脉冲清洗喷嘴内部气液两相流数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(4): 16 -20 .
[3] 李辉平, 赵国群, 张雷, 贺连芳. 超高强度钢板热冲压及模内淬火工艺的发展现状[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(3): 69 -74 .
[4] 刘新1 ，宋思利1 ，王新洪2 . 石墨配比对钨极氩弧熔敷层TiC增强相含量及分布形态的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(2): 98 -100 .
[5] 朱向彩,栾云才,徐健 . 基于VB及FTA的城市交通评价系统[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2007, 37(4): 89 -92 .
[6] 张霄 李术才 张庆松 刘钦 张宁 刘斌. TSP信号采集质量影响因素的现场试验研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(4): 25 -29 .
[7] 马其华 王宜泰. 高密度电阻率法在煤矿界外巨空水探测上的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(4): 107 -111 .
[8] 张志钢,张承慧，赵洪国,焉杰. 观测时滞连续系统的白噪声H2估计[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(3): 56 -61 .
[9] 张庆松 李术才 韩宏伟 葛颜慧 刘人太 张霄. 岩溶隧道施工风险评价与突水灾害防治技术研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(3): 106 -110 .
[10] 杨　晨,马文平,王新梅 . 实用的基于知识签名的群签名方案[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2007, 37(1): 76 -79 .
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(工学版)》编辑部　
地址: 济南市山大南路27号（250100）　 电话: 0531-88366735　 E-mail: xbgxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发