您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(工学版)》

山东大学学报(工学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 89-95.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2017.057

• • 上一篇    下一篇

T型管内两相流分配特性数值模拟

王丹华,张冠敏*,冷学礼,徐梦娜,韩圆圆   

  1. 山东大学能源与动力工程学院, 山东 济南 250061
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-19 出版日期:2018-02-20 发布日期:2017-02-19
  • 通讯作者: 张冠敏(1973— ),男,山东潍坊人,教授,博士,主要研究方向为传热强化及节能技术. E-mail:zhgm@sdu.edu.cn E-mail:dfdxrygh@qq.com
  • 作者简介:王丹华(1992— ),女,山东青岛人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为传热强化及流体分布. E-mail:dfdxrygh@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(31380005131503)

The numerical simulation of two-phase flow distribution characteristics in T-tube

WANG Danhua, ZHANG Guanmin*, LENG Xueli, XU Mengna, HAN Yuanyuan   

  1. School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, Shandong, China
  • Received:2017-02-19 Online:2018-02-20 Published:2017-02-19

摘要: T型管内气液两相流分配不均易导致换热器偏流和受热不均。为了优化T型管内气液两相流流动,以FLUENT为模拟软件,以流体流动参数和管子几何结构为研究变量,对T型管内流体流动进行数值模拟。发现流体入口液相体积分数越大,入口速度越小,液滴粒径越小,越利于流体均布;同时支管衔接处采取弯管结构较直管结构优越,其中入口速度对流体分布影响最明显,速度相差3个数值即可优化两个出口液相体积分数比差10%左右。结果表明,相应改变流体流动参数和管子几何结构能有效优化T型管内流体流动。

关键词: 流动参数, 流体均布, 气液两相流, 数值模拟, 几何结构

Abstract: Uneven distribution of gas-liquid two-phase flow in T-tube was easy to cause bias flow and uneven heating in heat exchangers. To optimize the gas-liquid two-phase flow in T-tube, the simulation about influences of flow parameters and tubes geometric structure on distribution of two-phase flow characteristics in T-tube was carried out by FLUENT. It was found that higher volume fraction of liquid phase and slower inlet velocity, and a smaller diameter of liquid drops facilitate even distribution of fluid. Meanwhile, the elbow structure was better than a straight tube at joints of branch tubes, the inlet velocity had most obvious influence on flow distribution, the difference of three units in speed could result in around 10% variation in volume fraction ration between two outlets. The results showed that change the flow parameters and tubes geometric structure correspond could optimize fluid flow in T-tube effectively.

Key words: uniform fluid distribution, flow parameters, geometric structure, numerical simulation, gas-liquid two-phase flow

中图分类号: 

  • TK121
[1] MUELLER A C. Effects of some types of maldistribution on the performance of heat exchangers[J]. Heat Transfer Engineering,1987, 8(2):75-86.
[2] MUELLER A C, CHIOU J P. Review of various types of flow maldistribution in heat exchanger[J]. Heat Transfer Engineering, 1988, 9(2):36-50.
[3] SIVERT V. Two-phase flow distribution in heat exchanger mainfolds[D]. Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2003.
[4] MOHAMMAD A, GEORGES B, PIERRE M. General characteristics of two-phase flow distribution in a compact heat exchanger[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2009, 52(1-2):442-450.
[5] 杨康,刘吉普,马雯波.基于FLUENT软件的T型三通管湍流数值模拟[J].化工装备技术, 2008, 29(4):33-36. YANG Kang, LIU Jipu, MA Wenbo. The turbulence numerical simulation of T-tube based on FLUENT software[J]. Chemical Equipment Technology, 2008, 29(4):33-36.
[6] 赵铎.水平管内气液两相流流型数值模拟与实验研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学,2007. ZHAO Duo. Numerical simulation and experimental research on flow pattern of gas-liquid flow in horizontal pipe[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum, 2007.
[7] 罗永浩,杨世铭,王孟浩.T型进口三通对分配联箱流量分配的影响[J].动力工程,1998,18(3):29-33. LUO Yonghao, YANG Shiming, WANG Menghao. The influence of T-tube on distribution of flux in distribution header[J]. Power Engineering, 1998, 18(3):29-33.
[8] 罗永浩,杨世铭.锅炉集箱支管流动机理探讨[J].锅炉技术,1997(4):11-13. LUO Yonghao, YANG Shiming. The flow mechanism of boiler header pipe[J]. Boiler Technology, 1997(4): 11-13.
[9] MASAHIRO O, TOMOYUKI H, SACHIYO H. Water flow distribution in horizontal header contaminated with bubbles[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1999, 25(5):827-840.
[10] 缪正清,徐通模.集箱与并联管屏系统单相流体的流动特性[J].上海交通大学学报,2000,34(9):1206-1210. MIU Zhengqing, XU Tongmo. The fluid flow characteristics of single phase in header and parallel tube system[J]. Journal of Shanghai JiaoTong University, 2000, 34(9):1206-1210.
[11] WANG C C, YANG K S, TSAI J S, et al. Characteristics of flow distribution in compact parallel flow heat exchangers part I: typical inlet header[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2011, 31:3226-3242.
[12] CHARRON Y, WHALLEY P B. Gas-liquid annular flow at a vertical tee junction-part flow separation[J]. Multiphase Flow, 1995, 21(4):569-589.
[13] CHIOU J P. The effect of nonuniform fluid flow distribution on the thermal performance of solar collector[J]. Solar Energy, 1982, 29(6):487-502.
[14] CHIOU J P. Thermal performance deterioration in crossflow heat exchanger due to the flow nonuniformity [J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 1978, 100(4):580-587.
[15] CHIOU J P. The effect of longitudinal heat conduction on crossflow heat exchanger[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 1978, 100(2):346-351.
[16] SAAD S B, CLEMENT P, FOURMIGUE J F, et al. Single phase pressure drop and two-phase distribution in an offset strip fin compact heat exchanger[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2002, 49(6):99-105.
[17] MULLER-MENZEL T. Plate-fin heat exchanger performance reduction in special two-phase flow conditions[J]. Cryogenics, 1995, 35(5):297-301.
[18] 陶文铨. 数值传热学[M]. 西安:西安交通大学出版社, 2001: 1-6.
[19] 李亚洁.分配联箱气液两相流的实验及数值模拟研究[D].北京:华北电力大学.2009. LI Yajie. Experimental investigation and numerical simulation on gas-liquid two phase flow in distribution header[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2009.
[20] ECKHARD K, BRAHMA N, ALEXANDR Z, et al. Experimental and numerical studies of volume fraction distribution in rectangular bubble columns[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2007, 237(4):399-408.
[1] 刘启明,王文辉,潘英楠,高要辉,郑程程,贺鹏. 厚度缺陷对初支结构安全性的影响及风险评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2025, 55(5): 165-178.
[2] 义扬,肖映雄,余科. 任意多边形骨料混凝土细观模型的建立与数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2025, 55(1): 97-107.
[3] 陈文举, 陈俐企, 包春波, 朱启银, 惠冰, 庄培芝. 循环管道加热桥面融雪效能数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(6): 100-110.
[4] 马川义,冯豪杰,蒋红光,侯天新,姚占勇,杨为民. 吸水土工布对路基湿度控制效果的数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(4): 141-149.
[5] 韩超,王彤,陈德文,孙恩赐,李平,吴则祥,周冲,庄培芝. 基于耦合欧拉-拉格朗日方法的砂土中静压桩挤土效应数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(2): 143-152.
[6] 王钰鑫,吕思忠,姚望,林春金,张明,李召峰,张健,王衍升. 粉质黏土地层桩侧劈裂注浆参数设计与效果评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(6): 70-81.
[7] 张亚平,马唯婧,张宸硕,肖辉,张一鸣. 基于图像识别与CAE仿真技术的输变电塔一体化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(6): 122-130.
[8] 宋洋,罗志恒,张波,张宇,朱敏. 裂隙位置对类岩体短柱单轴压缩破坏形态影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(5): 121-131.
[9] 王心泉,王智猛,牛犇,蒋恒,冯春. 8度地震烈度区新民隧道出口处边坡的稳定性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(3): 23-30.
[10] 孙杰,张宏博,程钰,刘羽,张洪波,刘志鲲. 基于TDA填料的废旧轮胎条带加筋砂土边坡承载特性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(1): 49-59.
[11] 牛犇,张新伟,周玉,李婧,徐兴全,张一鸣. 基于连续-非连续元降雨工况三维边坡稳定性分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(1): 92-99.
[12] 郭鹏宁,刘巍,袁浩,冯硕,王延刚. 基于微元离散模型的螺旋挤压脱水效率分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(1): 114-121.
[13] 张一鸣,李赟鹏,李婧,丛俊余. 孔隙裂隙介质多场耦合数值计算进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(6): 63-78.
[14] 郑卫琴,许杰,孙杰,武科. 复合地层TBM隧道管片受力特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(4): 210-213.
[15] 章清涛,刘晓威,高健,孙玉海,闫庆亮,刘源,王昊. 坡顶荷载作用下废旧轮胎条带加筋边坡承载特性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(3): 70-79.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王素玉,艾兴,赵军,李作丽,刘增文 . 高速立铣3Cr2Mo模具钢切削力建模及预测[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(1): 1 -5 .
[2] 李 侃 . 嵌入式相贯线焊接控制系统开发与实现[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(4): 37 -41 .
[3] 施来顺,万忠义 . 新型甜菜碱型沥青乳化剂的合成与性能测试[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(4): 112 -115 .
[4] 孔祥臻,刘延俊,王勇,赵秀华 . 气动比例阀的死区补偿与仿真[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(1): 99 -102 .
[5] 来翔 . 用胞映射方法讨论一类MKdV方程[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(1): 87 -92 .
[6] 余嘉元1 , 田金亭1 , 朱强忠2 . 计算智能在心理学中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 1 -5 .
[7] 陈瑞,李红伟,田靖. 磁极数对径向磁轴承承载力的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 81 -85 .
[8] 王波,王宁生 . 机电装配体拆卸序列的自动生成及组合优化[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 52 -57 .
[9] 李可,刘常春,李同磊 . 一种改进的最大互信息医学图像配准算法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 107 -110 .
[10] 季涛,高旭,孙同景,薛永端,徐丙垠 . 铁路10 kV自闭/贯通线路故障行波特征分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 111 -116 .