JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 72-77.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2015.381

Previous Articles     Next Articles

An interval UTA method based on the satisfaction degree of decision maker

XIONG Wentao1,2, FENG Yuqiang1   

  1. 1.Hubei Province Key Laboratory of System Science in Metallurgical Process(Wuhan University of Science and Technology), Wuhan 430081, Hubei, China;
    2. School of Mathematics and Statistics, Hubei Engineering University, Xiaogan 432000, Hubei, China
  • Received:2015-11-19 Online:2016-04-20 Published:2015-11-19

Abstract: An interval UTA method was proposed for inferring interval utility functions from a partial preorder of alternatives evaluated on multiple criteria, which was an extension of the well-known UTA method capable to handle the interval evaluation data. Firstly, according to the original UTA method, the interval attribute values of all reference options were transformed into the ranges of utility, namely, the utility intervals. Next, the overall utility intervals were calculated using the arithmetic operations of interval number. A linear programming model was constructed based on the satisfaction degree of decision maker utilizing the mid-point and half-width of interval numbers. After the total error value was obtained, a quadratic programming model was established in the post-optimization step, where the objective function was the minimum utility variance of all nodes along all criteria. The obtained utility values of all nodes were used to calculate the overall utility intervals and ranking of alternatives under evaluation. Numerical example showed that the alternatives could effectively ranked using the proposed interval UTA method, which was compatible with the preference information of decision maker.

Key words: UTA method, multiple criteria decision, utility value, interval number, the satisfaction degree

CLC Number: 

  • C934
[1] JACQUET-LAGREZE E, SISKOS J. Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making, the UTA method[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1982, 10(2):151-164.
[2] BEUTHE M, SCANNELLA G. Comparative analysis of UTA multicriteria methods[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 130(2):246-262.
[3] BOUS G, FORTEMPS P, GLINEUR F, et al. ACUTA:A novel method for eliciting additive value functions on the basis of holistic preference statements[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 206(2):435-444.
[4] KADZINSKI M, GRECO S, SŁOWINSKI R. RUTA:a framework for assessing and selecting additive value functions on the basis of rank related requirements[J]. Omega, 2013, 41(41):735-751.
[5] GRECO S, MOUSSEAU V, SLOWINSKI R. Ordinal regression revisited:multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 191(2):415-435.
[6] FIGUEIRA J R, GRECO S, SLOWINSKI R. Building a set of additive value functions representing a reference preorder and intensities of preference:GRIP method[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 195(2):460-486.
[7] GRECO S, KADZINSKI M, MOUSSEAU V, et al. Robust ordinal regression for multiple criteria group decision:UTAGMS-GROUP and UTADISGMS-GROUP[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2012, 52(3):549-561.
[8] KADZINSKI M, GRECO S, SŁOWINSKI R. Selection of a representative value function for robust ordinal regression in group decision making[J]. Group Decision & Negotiation, 2013, 22(22):429-462.
[9] GRECO S, MOUSSEAU V, SŁOWINSKI R. Robust ordinal regression for value functions handling interacting criteria[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 239(3):711-730.
[10] KADZINSKI M, GRECO S, SŁOWINSKI R. Selection of a representative value function in robust multiple criteria ranking and choice[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 217(3):541-553.
[11] SPYRIDAKOS A, YANNACOPOULOS D. Incorporating collective functions to multicriteria disaggregation—aggregation approaches for small group decision making[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2014, 227(1):119-136.
[12] ATHAWALE V M, KUMAR R, CHAKRABORTY S. Decision making for material selection using the UTA method[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2011, 57(1-4):11-22.
[13] KHOLGHI M. Multi-criterion decision-making tools for wastewater planning management[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science & Technology, 2001, 3(3):281-286.
[14] 段雪妍, 余思勤, 王效俐, 等. 基于UTAGMS方法的内河港口竞争力排序[J]. 上海海事大学学报, 2015, 36(1):6-11. DUAN Xueyan, YU Siqin, WANG Xiaoli, et al. Inland port competitiveness ranking based on UTAGMS method[J]. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 2015, 36(1):6-11.
[15] 王坚强. 信息不完全确定的模糊多准则UTA方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2006, 28(4):545-550. WANG Jianqiang. Fuzzy multi-criteria UTA approach with uncertain information[J]. Systems Engineering & Electronics, 2006, 28(4):545-550.
[16] EHSANIFAR M, ESHLAGHI A T, KERAMATI M A, et al. The development of UTASTAR method in fuzzy environment for supplier selection[J]. European Journal of Scientific Research, 2013, 108(3):317-326.
[17] HAIDER H, SINGH P, ALI W, et al. Sustainability evaluation of surface water quality management options in developing countries:multicriteria analysis using fuzzy UTASTAR method[J]. Water Resources Management, 2015, 29(8):2987-3013.
[18] PATINIOTAKIS I, APOSTOLOU D, MENTZAS G. Fuzzy UTASTAR:A method for discovering utility functions from fuzzy data[J]. Expert Systems with Applications:An International Journal, 2011, 38(12):15463-15474.
[19] GANESAN K, VEERAMANI P. On arithmetic operations of interval numbers[J]. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 2005, 13(6):619-631.
[20] SENGUPTA A, PAL T K. On comparing interval numbers[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 127(1):28-43.
[21] SISKOS Y, GRIGOROUDIS E. Preference disaggregation for measuring and analysing customer satisfaction:The MUSA method[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 143(1):148-170.
[1] YAN Li, RUAN Yan-li, PEI Zheng*. Linguistic interval 2-tuple power average operator and its application [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2013, 43(1): 115-122.
[2] LI Xiu-hai1, YU Shao-wei2*. Cloud droplets obtaining algorithm based on normal interval number [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2012, 42(5): 130-134.
[3] YU Shao-wei. Construction of a fuzzy membership function based on interval number [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2010, 40(6): 32-35.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] LI Ke,LIU Chang-chun,LI Tong-lei . Medical registration approach using improved maximization of mutual information[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2006, 36(2): 107 -110 .
[2] YUE Yuan-Zheng. Relaxation in glasses far from equilibrium[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2009, 39(5): 1 -20 .
[3] CHENG Daizhan, LI Zhiqiang. A survey on linearization of nonlinear systems[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2009, 39(2): 26 -36 .
[4] WANG Yong, XIE Yudong. Gas control technology of largeflow pipe[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2009, 39(2): 70 -74 .
[5] LIU Xin 1, SONG Sili 1, WANG Xinhong 2. [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2009, 39(2): 98 -100 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2009, 39(2): 104 -107 .
[7] CHEN Huaxin, CHEN Shuanfa, WANG Binggang. The aging behavior and mechanism of base asphalts[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2009, 39(2): 125 -130 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2009, 39(2): 131 -136 .
[9] LI Shijin, WANG Shengte, HUANG Leping. Change detection with remote sensing images based on forward-backward heterogenicity[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2018, 48(3): 1 -9 .
[10] ZHAO Ke-Jun, WANG Xin-Jun, LIU Xiang, CHOU Yi-Hong. Algorithms of continuous top-k join query over structured overlay networks[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2009, 39(5): 32 -37 .