您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（工学版）》

山东大学学报 (工学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (1): 60-68.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2020.294

• • 上一篇    

考虑支护结构作用的地下管廊真实受力模型

李连祥1,2,王雷1,2,赵永新1,2,季相凯1,2   

  1. 1.山东大学基坑与深基础工程技术研究中心, 山东 济南 250061;2.山东大学土建与水利学院, 山东 济南 250061
  • 发布日期:2021-03-01
  • 作者简介:李连祥(1966— ),男,河北唐山人,教授,博导,主要研究方向为基坑工程理论与技术. E-mail: jk_doctor@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(51508310);山东省优秀中青年科学家科研基金资助项目(BS2013SF024);济南市科技计划资助项目(201201145)

True mechanical model of underground pipe corridor supported by piles

LI Lianxiang1,2, WANG Lei1,2, ZHAO Yongxin1,2, JI Xiangkai1,2   

  1. 1. Research Center of Foundation Pit and Deep Foundation Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, Shandong, China;
    2. School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, Shandong, China
  • Published:2021-03-01

PDF (PC)

187

摘要： 为了研究桩撑支护体系对管廊结构受力的影响,以济南市某地下综合管廊工程为例,通过Plaxis 3D有限元软件对该工程进行全过程模拟,发现桩撑支护结构下地下管廊侧板受力呈三段式分布:先增大后减小再增大,明显小于静止土压力,管廊侧板内力小于传统方法。改变廊顶覆土厚度,根据模拟结果拟合得到管廊侧板受力的分布曲线及其简化曲线,同时证明不同覆土厚度下回填土体土压力均为三段式分布,且各段始末位置与覆土厚度有定量关系。计算结果证实,按简化曲线计算所得管廊侧板内力与模拟值较为吻合,即该简化曲线有较好的适用性。按照简化曲线计算管廊侧板荷载,设计得到的管廊结构更加符合实际,更加经济合理。

关键词: 管廊结构, 支护结构作用, 回填土体土压力, 土体变形, 覆土厚度, 受力模型

Abstract: In order to study the influence of the pile support system on the real mechanical model of the pipe gallery structure, taking an underground comprehensive pipe gallery project in Jinan as an example, the whole process of the project was simulated by using the Plaxis 3D finite element software. It was found that the stress on the side plate of the underground pipe gallery under the pile support was distributed in three sections: first increase, then decrease, then increase, and obviously less than the static earth pressure, and the internal force of the side plate of the pipe gallery was less than the traditional square law. According to the simulation results, the stress distribution curve and its simplified curve of the side plate of the pipe gallery were obtained by changing the thickness of the covered soil on the top of the gallery. The calculation results showed that the internal force of the side plate of the pipe gallery calculated by the simplified curve was in good agreement with the simulation value, that was to say, the simplified curve had better applicability. According to the simplified curve to calculate the side load of the pipe gallery, the designed pipe gallery structure was more practical, economic and reasonable.

Key words: pipe gallery structure, function of supporting structure, earth pressure of backfill soil, deformation of earth, thickness of overburden, force model

中图分类号: 

  • TU43
[1] 岳庆霞, 李杰. 地下综合管廊地震响应研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2009,37(3):285-290. YUE Qingxia, LI Jie. Study on seismic response of underground comprehensive pipe gallery[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science Edition), 2009, 37(3): 285-290.
[2] 北京市建筑设计标准化办公室.北京市建筑设计技术细则(结构专业)[M].北京: 经济科学出版社,2005.
[3] ZHANG Yan. Wireless mesh networking: architectures, protocols, and standards[M]. Historical Interpretations. Free Press, 2007.
[4] 应宏伟,郑贝贝,谢新宇. 狭窄基坑平动模式刚性挡墙被动土压力分析[J]. 岩土力学,2011,32(12):3755-3762. YING Hongwei, ZHENG Beibei, XIE Xinyu. Passive earth pressure analysis of rigid retaining wall in tran-slational mode of narrow foundation pit[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(12): 3755-3762.
[5] 王正振,龚维明,戴国亮,等.考虑位移影响的土压力非线性计算[J].岩土工程学报,2019,41(增刊2):244-248. WANG Zhengzhen, GONG Weiming, DAI Guoliang, et al. Nonlinear calculation of earth pressure considering displacement effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(Suppl.2): 244-248.
[6] 宋飞,张建民.考虑挡墙位移效应的被动侧土压力计算方法[J].岩土力学,2011,32(1):151-157. SONG Fei, ZHANG Jianmin. Calculation method of passive lateral earth pressure considering displacement effect of retaining wall[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(1): 151-157.
[7] 徐日庆,李昕睿,朱剑锋.刚性挡土墙平动模式下中间被动土压力的计算[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2010,44(10):2005-2009. XU Riqing, LI Xinrui, ZHU Jianfeng. Calculation of intermediate passive earth pressure under the translational mode of rigid retaining wall[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Edition), 2010, 44(10):2005-2009.
[8] 李连祥,刘兵,成晓阳. 基坑支护桩永久存在对地下室外墙土压力分布的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018,48(2):30-38. LI Lianxiang, LIU Bing, CHENG Xiaoyang. The influence of the permanent existence of foundation pit supporting piles on the distribution of earth pressure of underground outdoor walls[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Edition), 2018, 48(2): 30-38.
[9] 强跃,李莉,赵琦,等.既有地下室外墙影响下的挡土结构非极限主动土压力计算方法[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2016,48(3):55-63. QIANG Yue, LI Li, ZHAO Qi, et al. Calculation method of non limit active earth pressure of retaining structure under the influence of external wall of existing basement [J]. Journal of Sichuan University(Engineering Science Edition), 2016, 48(3): 55-63.
[10] 朱建明,林庆涛,高晓将,等.临近地下室外墙影响下的挡土墙空间土压力研究[J].岩土力学,2016,37(12):3417-3426. ZHU Jianming, LIN Qingtao, GAO Xiaojiang, et al. Study on the spatial earth pressure of retaining wall under the influence of the exterior wall near the basement[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(12): 3417-3426.
[11] 应宏伟,黄东,谢新宇.考虑邻近地下室外墙侧压力影响的平动模式挡土墙主动土压力研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2011,30(S1):2970-2978. YING Hongwei, HUANG Dong, XIE Xinyu. Study on active earth pressure of retaining wall with translational mode considering the influence of lateral pressure of adjacent basement wall[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(S1): 2970-2978.
[12] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 城市综合管廊工程技术规范:GB50838—2015[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2015.
[13] BRINKGREVE R B J. Selection of soil models and parameters for geotechnical engineering application[C] // Proceedings of Geo-frontier Conference. Texas, USA: Soil Proper Mies and Modeling Geo-Intitute of ASCE, 2005:69-98.
[14] 刘国彬,王卫东.基坑工程手册[M]. 2版. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009.
[15] 李连祥,刘嘉典,李克金,等. 济南典型地层HSS参数选取及适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019,40(10):4021-4029. LI Lianxiang, LIU Jiadian, LI Kejin, et al. Study on the selection and applicability of HSS parameters for typical strata in Jinan[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10):4021-4029.
[16] 邓子胜. 深基坑支护结构-土非线性共同作用弹性地基反力法[J]. 土木工程学报,2006(4):68-72. DENG Zisheng. Elastic foundation reaction method of deep foundation pit supporting structure soil nonlinear interaction[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2006(4): 68-72.
[17] 杨光华. 深基坑支护结构的实用计算方法及其应用[J]. 岩土力学,2004,25(12):1885-1896. YANG Guanghua. Practical calculation method and application of deep foundation pit support structure[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2004,25(12): 1885-1896.
[18] 朱彦鹏,魏升华. 深基坑支护桩与土相互作用的研究[J].岩土力学,2010,31(9):2840-2844. ZHU Yanpeng, WEI Shenghua. Study on the interaction between retaining pile and soil in deep foundation pit[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(9): 2840-2844.
[19] 李涛,江永华,朱连华,等.桩-土相互作用支护桩受力变形计算方法[J].西南交通大学学报,2016,51(1):14-21. LI Tao, JIANG Yonghua, ZHU Lianhua, et al. Calculation method of stress and deformation of pile-soil interaction support pile[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 51(1): 14-21.
[1] 孙连勇,时刚,崔新壮,周明祥,王永军,纪方,闫小东. 饱和地基中单排孔近场隔振的现场试验与数值分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2020, 50(3): 88-97.
[2] 李连祥,白璐,陈天宇,季相凯. 复合地基与临近基坑支护结构之间距离影响规律[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2019, 49(3): 63-72, 79.
[3] 张建明, 刘泉声, 唐志成, 占婷, 蒋亚龙. 考虑剪切变形历史影响的节理峰值剪切强度准则[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 0, (): 77-81.
[4] 陈恩瑜,邓思文,陈方明,马池帅. 一种基于TBM掘进参数的现场岩石强度快速估算模型[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(2): 7-13.
[5] 白现军,王太兴,卫鑫,赵武胜. 近断层速度脉冲对隧洞工程动力响应的影响规律[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(2): 14-19.
[6] 刘金,李勤昌,马秀媛. 有限元强度折减法在边坡稳定分析中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(4): 83-88.
[7] 刘金慧. 基于多目标非线性函数某深基坑参数反演分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(4): 75-83.
[8] 张 欣,李术才,李树忱 . 考虑天然渗流场影响的地应力场反演回归分析及应用[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(4): 57-62 .
[9] 张建明,刘泉声,唐志成,占婷,蒋亚龙. 考虑剪切变形历史影响的节理峰值剪切强度准则[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2015, 45(5): 77-81.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(工学版)》编辑部　
地址: 济南市山大南路27号（250100）　 电话: 0531-88366735　 E-mail: xbgxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发