您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(工学版)》

山东大学学报 (工学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4): 78-85.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2018.055

• 机械与能动工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

大断面小净距公路隧道施工影响分析

刘明才()   

  1. 中铁十四局集团第二工程有限公司, 山东 泰安 271000
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-28 出版日期:2019-08-20 发布日期:2019-08-06
  • 作者简介:刘明才(1977—),男,山东新泰人,工程硕士,高级工程师,主要研究方向为工程项目管理工作. E-mail:478401293@qq.com

Impact analysis on construction of large section and small spacing road tunnel

Mingcai LIU()   

  1. China Railway 14th Bureau Group 2nd Engineering Co., Ltd., Tai'an 271000, Shandong, China
  • Received:2018-01-28 Online:2019-08-20 Published:2019-08-06

摘要:

以佛羊岭隧道工程为研究背景,采用上下台阶法进行施工,以FLAC3D有限元软件为计算平台,建立大断面小净距公路隧道有限元模型,对隧道模型进行数值模拟分析。研究地表沉降、围岩与衬砌结构应力,并提出相应的监控和加固对策。数值分析结果表明:先行隧洞上部地表沉降比后行隧洞大,后行隧洞的施工会增大先行隧洞竖向位移,使先行洞的最大主应力和最小主应力出现不同幅度的增加,隧道衬砌结构应力集中于拱腰至拱脚范围区域,先行洞支护结构对于后行洞开挖起到稳定岩体的作用,后行隧道的开挖会使中夹岩柱出现应力集中,在施工时应注意对隧道围岩采取加固措施。分析结果能够为大断面小净距公路隧道的设计和施工提供科学依据。

关键词: 大断面, 小净距, 公路隧道, 数值模拟, 影响分析

Abstract:

The construction project of Fo Yangling Tunnel was taken as the research background, the construction was carried out by using benching tunneling construction method. The fast Lagrangian analysis of continua 3D (FLAC3D) finite element software was used as the calculation platform to establish the finite element model of tunnel with large section and small clear distance. The tunnel model was numerically simulated and subsidence, stress of surrounding rock and lining structural were analyzed. And the corresponding monitoring and reinforcement measures were put forward. The results of numerical analysis showed that the settlement of the upper part of the advance tunnel was larger than the subsequent tunnel. The construction of the subsequent tunnel increased the vertical displacement of the advance tunnel, which caused the increase of maximum principal stress and the minimum principal stress. The stress of tunnel lining structure was concentrated in the area from arch waist to arch foot. The support structure of advance tunnel played the role of stabilizing rock mass in the excavation of subsequent tunnel, and the excavation of the subsequent tunnel would make the stress concentration of the middle rock. In the construction, attention should be payed to the surrounding rock and reinforcement measures should be taken. The analysis results could provide a scientific basis for the design and construction of large section and small spacing road tunnel.

Key words: large section, small spacing, road tunnel, numerical simulation, impact analysis

中图分类号: 

  • U455

图1

佛羊岭隧道纵断面地质工程图"

图2

数值计算模型"

表1

材料参数取值"

围岩弹性模量/GPa泊松比粘聚力/kPa摩擦角/(°)密度/(kg·m-3)
坡积层0.410.352017.51 650
全风化花岗岩1.800.282635.01 980
中风化花岗岩2.500.253035.02 200
初期支护24.000.172 500

图3

YK116+263处拱顶沉降随施工步变化曲线"

图4

YK116+285处拱顶沉降随施工步变化曲线"

图5

地表沉降变化曲线图"

图6

控制点位置图"

图7

左洞隧道控制点竖向位移随右洞开挖步的变化曲线"

图8

左洞隧道周边收敛值随右洞开挖步的变化曲线"

图9

左洞开挖完成后的水平位移云图(单位:m)"

图10

右洞开挖完成后的水平位移云图(单位:m)"

表2

衬砌结构主应力表"

MPa
控制点先行洞最大主应力后行洞最大主应力先行洞最小主应力后行洞最小主应力
左洞开挖完成右洞开挖完成左洞开挖完成右洞开挖完成
A-0.110-0.310-0.127-1.562-1.838-1.395
B-0.133-0.326-0.157-0.903-1.302-0.969
C-0.122-0.376-0.121-1.244-1.933-1.240
D-0.310-0.581-0.450-1.306-2.481-1.584
E0.107-0.084-0.015-0.277-0.5210.426
F-0.131-0.332-0.318-1.285-1.574-1.386

图11

左洞开挖完成后的竖向应力云图(单位:m)"

图12

右洞开挖完成后的竖向应力云图(单位:m)"

图13

地表沉降监测点布置图"

表3

加固措施的适用情况"

加固措施超前注浆长系统锚杆水平对拉锚杆
适用情况净距大于1倍跨度净距大于6 m净距小于6 m
1 张铁柱. 四车道特大断面小净距公路隧道力学响应分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2015, 48 (增刊1): 302- 305.
ZHANG Tiezhu . Analysis of mechanical response of four-lane small clear spacing highway tunnel with super-large cross-section[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48 (Suppl.1): 302- 305.
2 景银超. 低山重丘区路基U, V形沟填筑施工技术[J]. 施工技术, 2015, 44 (增刊2): 290- 292.
JING Yinchao . U and V shape grooves filling construction technology in low-mountain multi-hillock embankment[J]. Construction Technology, 2015, 44 (Suppl.2): 290- 292.
3 蒋树屏. 公路隧道工程品质与技术对策[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2017, 54 (4): 1- 12.
JIANG Shuping . Quality and technical countermeasures in highway tunnel engineering[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2017, 54 (4): 1- 12.
4 周轮, 李术才, 许振浩, 等. 隧道综合超前地质预报技术及其工程应用[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47 (2): 55- 62.
ZHOU Lun , LI Shucai , XU Zhenhao , et al. Integrated advanced geological prediction technology of tunnel and its engineering application[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2017, 47 (2): 55- 62.
5 KONG X X. Mechanical behavior analysis for parallel small spacing tunnels in a loess region[C]//Proceedings of the Fourth Geo-China International Conference, 2016. Jinan: ASCE, 2016.
6 ZHU M . Analysis on net distance optimization of large section tunnel with small distance[J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University, 2017, 36 (2): 191- 196.
7 SUN S R , LU Y X , ZHANG S H , et al. Research on deformation mechanism of surrounding rock during excavation of large-span shallow-buried double-arch tunnel[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 392, 890- 894.
doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.392.890
8 张国华, 陈礼彪, 钱师雄, 等. 大断面小净距大帽山隧道现场监控量测及分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31 (2): 489- 496.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.02.026
ZHANG Guohua , CHEN Libiao , QIAN Shixiong , et al. On-site supervision measure and analysis of Damaoshan Tunnels with large section and small clear-distance[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31 (2): 489- 496.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.02.026
9 夏才初, 龚建伍, 唐颖, 等. 大断面小净距公路隧道现场监测分析研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26 (1): 44- 50.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.01.006
XIA Caichu , GONG Jianwu , TANG Ying , et al. Study on site monitoring of large-section highway tunnels with small clear spacing[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26 (1): 44- 50.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.01.006
10 刘智勇, 尹登华, 吴学智, 等. 某公路隧道塌方原因分析及处治技术[J]. 路基工程, 2018, (1): 235- 239.
LIU Zhiyong , YIN Denghua , WU Xuezhi , et al. Analysis of mechanical response of four-lane small clear spacing highway tunnel with super-large cross-section[J]. Subgrade Engineering, 2018, (1): 235- 239.
11 黄伦海, 钱七虎. 公路隧道大断面改扩建施工开挖方案研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2016, 53 (5): 145- 153.
HUANG Lunhai , QIAN Qihu . Study on excavation schemes for the redevelopment construction of highway tunnels with large sections[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2016, 53 (5): 145- 153.
12 杨凯, 吴顺川, 吴庆良, 等. 并行隧道顺序开挖围岩及衬砌承载行为分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2015, 11 (增刊1): 239- 245.
YANG Kai , WU Shunchuan , WU Qingliang , et al. Cause analysis of a highway tunnel collapse and the treatment technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2015, 11 (Suppl.1): 239- 245.
13 陆伟, 陈皓, 李小青. 小净距隧道施工工序的数值模拟分析[J]. 公路, 2014, 59 (10): 291- 296.
LU Wei , CHEN Hao , LI Xiaoqing . Numerical simulation of construction process of tunnel with small clear distance[J]. Highway, 2014, 59 (10): 291- 296.
14 郑宏利. 超小净距大断面隧道原位扩挖CD工法应力变形特性研究[J]. 铁道建筑技术, 2017, (2): 58- 61.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4539.2017.02.014
ZHENG Hongli . Study on stress deformation characteristics of enlarging tunnel with large cross-section and super-small clear distance at initial construction stage by CD method[J]. Railway Construction Technology, 2017, (2): 58- 61.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4539.2017.02.014
15 侯瑞彬, 申玉生, 陈明奎, 等. 基于强度折减法的浅埋偏压小净距隧道围岩稳定性分析[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2014, 58 (4): 55- 60.
HOU Ruibin , SHEN Yusheng , CHEN Mingkui , et al. Analysis on surrounding rock stability of shallowly-buried eccentrically-loaded tunnels with small interval based on strength reduction method[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2014, 58 (4): 55- 60.
16 XIAO J Z , DAI F C , WEI Y Q , et al. Analysis of mechanical behavior in a pipe roof during excavation of a shallow bias tunnel in loose deposits[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75 (4): 293.
doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-5176-y
[1] 周慧琳,邱燕. 矩形蓄热单元内石蜡的相变传热特性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2019, 49(4): 99-107.
[2] 张宇磊,王勇,谢玉东,孙光,王艳芸,韩家桢. 新型液态金属磁流体发电动力学特性数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2019, 49(1): 101-106.
[3] 王忠啸,崔新壮,崔社强,张磊,车华桥,苏俊伟. 咸水区水泥土桩劣化及改性对道路复合地基的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 69-77.
[4] 宋贵杰. 浅埋软岩段隧道进洞施工变形特征与失稳分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 53-60.
[5] 王丹华,张冠敏,冷学礼,徐梦娜,韩圆圆. T型管内两相流分配特性数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(1): 89-95.
[6] 夏梦然,李卫,冯啸,朱光轩,李夏. 极浅埋富水砂层地铁横通道注浆加固与开挖稳定性[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(2): 47-54.
[7] 万利,王春河,王琦,李术才,邵行,江贝,孙会彬,秦乾. 超大断面隧道软弱围岩控制机制及应用[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(1): 59-67.
[8] 郑林彬,王建明,何讯超. 2024铝合金喷丸粗糙度试验与数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(1): 84-89.
[9] 吕国仁,张群,牛奔,高全亭,武照收. 高层建筑桩基施工对邻近建筑物的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(1): 48-58.
[10] 彭元诚,董旭,梁娜,邓振全. 北盘江新型空腹式连续刚构桥角隅节点模型试验研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(6): 113-119.
[11] 米春荣,李建明. 预应力混凝土管桩后注浆器的研制与应用[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(4): 89-95.
[12] 周乾,闫维明,纪金豹. 故宫灵沼轩钢结构动力特性与地震响应[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(1): 70-79.
[13] 汤潍泽, 欧金秋, 崔新壮, 楼俊杰, 肖溟, 张炯, 黄丹, 侯飞. 车载引起的沥青路面内动水压力现场试验研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(6): 84-90.
[14] 曹伟东, 戴涛, 于金彪, 席开华, 鲁统超, 程爱杰. 化学驱数值模拟的IMPIMC方法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(1): 88-94.
[15] 高智珺, 崔新壮, 隋伟, 郭洪, 刘航, 李长义, 冯洪波. 大型失控车辆与隧道衬砌的动态相互作用与损伤分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(5): 49-57.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张永花,王安玲,刘福平 . 低频非均匀电磁波在导电界面的反射相角[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 22 -25 .
[2] 浦剑1 ,张军平1 ,黄华2 . 超分辨率算法研究综述[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 27 -32 .
[3] 孙国华,吴耀华,黎伟. 消费税控制策略对供应链系统绩效的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 63 -68 .
[4] 王静,李玉江,张晓瑾, 毕研俊,陈位锁 . 粉煤灰去除水中活性紫KN-B[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(6): 100 -103 .
[5] 孙玉利,李法德,左敦稳,戚美 . 直立分室式流体连续通电加热系统的升温特性[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(6): 19 -23 .
[6] 李辉平, 赵国群, 张雷, 贺连芳. 超高强度钢板热冲压及模内淬火工艺的发展现状[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(3): 69 -74 .
[7] 薛翊国,李术才,赵岩,苏茂鑫,李为腾,丁志海. 青岛胶州湾海底隧道F44含水断层注浆前后TSP探测分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(2): 108 -112 .
[8] 张恭孝,杨荣华 . 水杨醛缩甲基氨基硫脲Schiff碱配合物的合成与表征[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(3): 108 -111 .
[9] 蔡晓军1 ,张擎1 ,柴乔林1 ,孔苏丽2 . 基于能量均衡的n分多路径路由算法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(2): 141 -145 .
[10] 薛成骞,董建文,孟宪锋,常虹,曹宁,陈华英,李木森 . C/C+HA骨植入材料对杂交波尔山羊生理生化机能的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(3): 73 -76 .