磁悬浮旋翼驱动磁场对支承磁场的影响

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2018.498

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过理论分析以及有限元仿真分析，研究磁悬浮旋翼盘式电机的驱动磁场、磁悬浮系统的支承磁场以及二者之间的相互影响，得到影响的主要因素L₀。提出当关键临界尺寸L₀=11.87 mm时，驱动磁场对支承磁场的影响处于临界状态使其不失稳。通过等效试验对临界尺寸进行了试验验证。根据临界尺寸L₀提出磁悬浮旋翼的设计准则，和一套可行的磁悬浮旋翼设计方案。

关键词: 磁悬浮旋翼, 支承磁场, 驱动磁场, 有限元法, 临界尺寸

Abstract:

Based on theoretical analysis and finite element simulation analysis, the mutual influence between the driving magnetic field of rotor disk motor and the supporting magnetic field of the magnetic levitation system were studied, the main factor L₀ was obtained. The critical dimension L₀ value was 11.87 mm to keep the system steady with the influence of the driving magnetic field on the supporting magnetic field. And the critical dimension was tested by equivalent tests. According to the critical dimension L₀, the design criteria of the magnetic suspension rotor and a feasible scheme of the magnetic suspension rotor were proposed.

Key words: magnetic levitation rotor, support magnetic field, drive magnetic field, finite element method, critical dimension

中图分类号:

TH133.31

王晓光,何壮,李显富,潘奥. 磁悬浮旋翼驱动磁场对支承磁场的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2019, 49(4): 86-92.

Xiaoguang WANG,Zhuang HE,Xianfu LI,Ao PAN. Influence of magnetic suspension rotor driving magnetic field on supporting magnetic field[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2019, 49(4): 86-92.

图/表 18

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表2

图6

图7

表3

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

图14

图15

参考文献 15

1	LEISHMAN J G . Introduction to the special section on helicopter rotor performance predictions by the rotorcraft simulation working group[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2018, 55 (1): 11. doi: 10.2514/1.C034806
2	GUERRERO J F , MARCHAND N , HABLY A , et al. Bounded attitude control of rigid bodies: real-time experimentation to a quadrotor mini-helicopter[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2011, 19 (8): 790- 797. doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2011.04.004
3	BOEHM J , GERBER K . Development of active magnetic bearings for high speed rotors[J]. Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on, 1990, 2 (5): 2544- 2546.
4	EVDOKIMOV Y K , IZOSIMOVA T A , DAVYDOV A V . Automatic control system of active magnetic suspension in turbo machine rotor[J]. Russian Aeronautics, 2014, 57 (3): 307- 313. doi: 10.3103/S1068799814030155
5	黄明其, 武杰, 何龙, 等. 旋翼模型悬停状态桨尖涡特性[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2018, 50 (4): 125- 130.
	HUANG Mingqi , WU Jie , HE Long , et al. Blade tip vortex characteristics of rotor under hovering status[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2018, 50 (4): 125- 130.
6	张维煜, 朱熀秋, 鞠金涛, 等. 磁悬浮轴承研究现状及其发展[J]. 轴承, 2016, 11 (12): 56- 63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3762.2016.12.015
	ZHANG Weiyu , ZHU Huangqiu , JU Jintao , et al. Research status and development of magnetic bearings[J]. Bearing, 2016, 11 (12): 56- 63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3762.2016.12.015
7	吴华春, 余海涛, 胡帅, 等. 同极永磁偏置径向磁悬浮轴承特性分析[J]. 轴承, 2018, 14 (7): 40- 45.
	WU Huachun , YU Haitao , HU Shuai , et al. Analysis on characteristics of homo -polar permanent biased radial magnetic bearings[J]. Bearing, 2018, 14 (7): 40- 45.
8	胡业发, 周祖德, 江征风. 磁力轴承的基础理论与应用[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2006.
9	李晶.盘式电机电磁场分析[D].北京:北京交通大学, 2011.
	LI Jing. Electromagnetic field analysis of disk motor[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2011.
10	徐衍亮, 吴巧变, 宫晓. 新型盘式横向磁通永磁无刷电机的变网络等效磁路模型[J]. 电工技术学报, 2016, 31 (17): 151- 157.
	XU Yanliang , WU Qiaobian , GONG Xiao . Network-varying equivalent magnetic circuit modeling of novel disk transverse-flux permanent magnet brushless machine[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2016, 31 (17): 151- 157.
11	景轩, 谭援强, 朱杰. 径向磁轴承磁路耦合对磁力的影响及其解耦控制策略[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28 (14): 1669- 1676.
	JING Xuan , TAN Yuanqiang , ZHU Jie . Impacts of magnetic flux coupling on force arrangements of radial magnetic bearings and its decoupling control strategies[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 28 (14): 1669- 1676.
12	MONTIE D D , MASLEN E E . Self-sensing in fault tolerant magnetic bearings[J]. Gas Turbines Power, 1999, 123 (4): 864- 870. doi: 10.1115/1.1383257
13	李红伟, 范友鹏, 张云鹏, 等. 轴流式人工心脏泵混合磁悬浮系统的耦合特性[J]. 电机与控制学报, 2014, 115 (5): 109- 115.
	LI Hongwei , FAN Youpeng , ZHANG Yunpeng , et al. Coupling in hybrid magnetic levitation system of axial-flow blood pump[J]. Electric Machines and Control, 2014, 115 (5): 109- 115.
14	吕少杰, 魏靖彪, 刘宁, 等. 旋翼气动特性分析及直升机配平计算[J]. 航空动力学报, 2017, 32 (10): 2484- 2490.
	LÜ Shaojie , WEI Jingbiao , LIU Ning , et al. Rotor aerodynamic characteristics analysis and helicopter trimming[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32 (10): 2484- 2490.
15	王晓光, 王秀珍. 磁力轴承反向差动驱动控制研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版), 2010, 32 (2): 226- 229. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1007-144X.2010.02.015
	WANG Xiaoguang , WANG Xiuzhen . Research on reverse differential drive control of magnetic bearings[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Information & Management Engineering), 2010, 32 (2): 226- 229. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1007-144X.2010.02.015

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

参数	数值
定子转子气隙δ/mm	0.59
额定电枢电流I_N/A	13.47
轭部磁密B_j1/T	0.69
磁极对数	2
线圈匝数N_d	268
额定转速ω/rpm	6 000

参数	数值
单边工作气隙x₀/mm	0.5
偏置磁感应强度B₀/T	0.6
计算最大承载力F_r /N	134.8
最大电流I_m /A	3
磁极面积A/mm²	100
线圈匝数N_c	320

L₀/mm	5	10	15	20	25
B_r/T	0.535	0.339	0.145	0.079	0.043

[1]	匡健1,王明斌2,3,张波4,张敦福4*. 地铁列车引起的振动对城市敏感建筑结构的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(6): 72-76.
[2]	王建明,裴信超,樊现行,刘伟,曹雁超. SPH耦合FEM模拟弹丸撞击对表面形貌的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(5): 87-92.
[3]	王建明,樊现行,裴信超,曹雁超. 光滑节点域有限元法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(2): 54-61.
[4]	王建明1,张刚1*,戚放2,樊现行1,余丰1. 基于光滑有限元法的体积锁定研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2012, 42(3): 93-99.
[5]	牛新生,叶华,王亮 . 充液弹性管束流固耦合系统模态分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2007, 37(4): 0-0 .
[6]	郑继周,程林,杜文静 . 充液弹性管束流固耦合系统模态分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2007, 37(4): 55-59 .