基于主客观赋权法的多目标多属性决策方法

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2014.306

山东大学学报(工学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1-9.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2014.306

• 控制科学与工程 • 下一篇

基于主客观赋权法的多目标多属性决策方法

宋冬梅¹, 刘春晓^1,2, 沈晨³, 石学法⁴, 臧琳^1,2, 冯文强^1,2

1. 中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院, 山东青岛 266580;
2. 中国石油大学(华东)研究生院, 山东青岛 266580;
3. 中国石油大学(华东)理学院, 山东青岛 266580;
4. 国家海洋局第一海洋研究所, 山东青岛 266061

收稿日期:2014-10-28 修回日期:2015-05-14 出版日期:2015-08-20 发布日期:2014-10-28
作者简介:宋冬梅(1973-),女,吉林长春人,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为遥感在区域环境变迁中的应用.E-mail:songdongmei1973@126.com
基金资助:
海洋公益行业科研专项经费资助项目(201205001)

Multiple objective and attribute decision making based on the subjective and objective weighting

SONG Dongmei¹, LIU Chunxiao^1,2, SHEN Chen³, SHI Xuefa⁴, ZANG Lin^1,2, FENG Wenqiang^1,2

1. School of Geoscience, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China;
2. Graduate School, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China;
3. College of Science, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China;
4. Frist Institute of Oceangraphy, State Oceanic Administration of People's Republic of China, Qingdao 266061, Shandong, China

Received:2014-10-28 Revised:2015-05-14 Online:2015-08-20 Published:2014-10-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对多目标多属性决策方法中,传统的主观赋权法决策者主观偏好过强,而客观赋权法又过多地依赖实测数据的局限性,利用模糊数学原理,提出一种新的主客观赋权方法。主观赋权部分具有考察决策者悲观、中立、乐观3种评价态度的优点,客观赋权部分主要基于CRITIC法和熵值法,充分考虑到数据的离散性、相关性和对比强度。利用线性组合法和乘法合成归一法对新提出的主客观权重进行融合,并以通信设备的抗干扰能力评价为例进行试验分析,证明了该方法的可行性和实用性。

关键词: 非结构性赋权法, 三角模糊数主观赋权法, 熵值赋权法, CRITIC赋权法, 主客观权重组合

Abstract: For main defects of traditional subjective weighing and objective weighing method in the process of multi-objective and multiple attribute decision, a new weight way combined subjective and objective weighting method was proposed. Subjective weigh method has advantages of considering three different attitudes (pessimistic, neutral, optimistic) of the policy makers. Objective weighting method was based on the CRITIC method and the Entropy value method, which fully considered the discrete, correlation and contrast intensity of the data. Finally, linear group legal and multiplication operator were used to combine subjective and objective weighting method. The feasibility and practicability of the proposed method was proved by the experiment of assessment on the anti-interference ability of the communication equipment.

Key words: non-structural fuzzy number method, CRITIC method, entropy value method, weight combination method, triangular fuzzy number method

中图分类号:

宋冬梅, 刘春晓, 沈晨, 石学法, 臧琳, 冯文强. 基于主客观赋权法的多目标多属性决策方法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(4): 1-9.

SONG Dongmei, LIU Chunxiao, SHEN Chen, SHI Xuefa, ZANG Lin, FENG Wenqiang. Multiple objective and attribute decision making based on the subjective and objective weighting[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2015, 45(4): 1-9.

参考文献

[1] 卫贵武.基于模糊信息的多属性决策理论与方法[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2010.
[2] 郭晓晶,何倩,张冬梅,等.综合运用主客观方法确定科技评价指标权重[J].科技管理研究,2012,20(15):64-71. GUO Xiaojing, HE Qian, ZHANG Dongmei, et al. Application of subjective and objective methods in weights determination of synthetic evaluation of science and technology[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2012, 20(15):64-71.
[3] 李晓倩.土地资源评价指标权重赋值方法的比较研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2012. LI Xiaqian. Study and comparison on the index weighting approach in land resource evaluation[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2012.
[4] 蔡雷.建模与仿真中权重确定的模糊数学方法[J].教学与科技,2004(2):23-27. CAI Lei. The fuzzy mathematics methods of determining weight in modeling and simulation[J]. Teaching and Science and Technology, 2004(2):23-27.
[5] 陈奎,张天云,胡玉霞,等.客观赋权发及其在工程选材中的适用性研究[J].材料导报,2013, 27(5):104-111. CHEN Kui, ZHANG Tianyun, HU Yuxia, et al. Study on applicability of objective weighted model in the selection of engineering materials[J]. Material Review, 2013, 27(5):104-111.
[6] 余后强,李玲.基于熵值法和CRITIC法的五类企业综合评价[J].湖北科技学院学报,2012,32(12):83-84. YU Houqiang, LI Ling. Five kinds of enterprise comprehensive evaluation based on the entropy value method and the CRITIC method[J]. Journal of Hubei Institute of Technology, 2012, 32(12):83-84.
[7] 路遥,徐林荣,陈舒阳,等.基于博弈论组合赋权的泥石流危险度评价[J].灾害学,2014,29(1):194-200. LU Yao, XU Linrong, CHEN Shuyang, et al. Combined weight method based on game theory for debris flow hazard risk assessment[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2014, 29(1):194-200.
[8] 李连结,姚建刚,龙立波.组合赋权法在电能质量模糊评价中的应用[J].电力系统自动化,2007,31(4):56-60. LI Lianjie, YAO Jiangang, LONG Libo. Application of combination weighting method in fuzzy synthetic evaluation of power quality[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2007, 31(4):56-60.
[9] 梁广东,卢广山,张安.基于组合赋权法的机场毁伤效果的模糊综合评判[J].火力与指挥控制,2013,38(12):75-87. LIANG Guangdong, LU Guangshan, ZHANG An. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation for air drome damage effect based on combination weights method[J]. Fire Control and Command Control, 2013, 38(12):75-87.
[10] 徐玲,王涛.一种基于隶属度最大化的组合赋权法[J].港航论坛,2006(2):44-48. XU Ling, WANG Tao. A combined method of determing weight based on maximizing the membership decision function[J]. Harbor and Shipping Forum, 2006(2):44-48.
[11] 周宏安.模糊多属性决策方法研究[D].西安:西安电子科技大学,2007. ZHOU Hongan. Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making method research[D]. Xi'an: Xidian University, 2007.
[12] 代旻,陈云翔,向玲.不确定多属性决策中的一种模糊赋权方法[J].数学的实践与认识,2007,37(15):60-64. DAI Min, CHEN Yunxiang, XIANG Ling. A fuzzy method of weighting in uncertain MADA[J].Mathematics Practice and Understanding, 2007, 37(15):60-64.
[13] 候东壮,吴湘滨,李余晖.基于模糊赋权法的境外矿产勘探风险动态评估[J].矿产研究与开发,2012,32(4):111-114. HOU Dongzhuang, WU Xiangbin, LI Yuhui, et al. Dynamic assessment of overseas mineral exploration risk based on fuzzy weighting[J]. Mining Research and Development, 2012, 32(4):111-114.
[14] 张甫仁,朱方圆,彭清元.重庆城区浅层地温能适宜性分区评价[J].重庆交通大学:自然科学版,2013,32(4):647-651. ZHANG Furen, ZHU Fangyuan, PENG Qingyuan. Adaptive partition evaluation of shallow geothermal energy in urban area of Chongqing[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University:Natural Science, 2013, 32(4):647-651.
[15] 龙娇.重庆地区浅层地温能开发利用适宜性分区研究[D].重庆:重庆交通大学,2012. LONGJiao. The adaptive partition of shallow geothermal energy application in Chongqing area[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2012.
[16] 刘九龙,林黎,程万庆.天津市地下水源热泵系统适宜性分区[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2012,42(1):380-385. LIU Jiulong, LIN Li, CHENG Wanqing. Suitability zoning for groundwater source heat pump systems in Tianjin[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2012, 42(1):380-385.
[17] 徐泽水.基于FOWA算子的三角模糊数互补判断矩阵排序法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2003(10):86-89. XU Zeshui.On priority of triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrix[J]. Journal of System Engineering, 2003(10):86-89.
[18] 肖鈺,李华.基于三角模糊数的判断矩阵的改进及其应用[J].模糊系统与数学,2003,17(2):59-64. XIAO Yu, LI Hua. Improvement on judgment matrix based on triangle fuzzy number[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2003, 17(2):59-64.
[19] 李东旭.基于层次分析法的我国大河三角洲脆弱性评价模型研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院,2012. LI Dongxu. Study on vulnerability assessment model of Chinese Large River Delta based on analytic hierarchy process[D]. Qingdao: School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (East China), 2012.
[20] CHOO E U, SCHONER B, WEDLEY W C. Interpretation of criteria weights in multi criteria decision making[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 1999, 37(2):527-541.
[21] DIAKOULAKI D, MAVROTAS G, PAPAYANNAKIS L. Determining objective weights in multi le criteria problems: the CRITIC method[J]. Computers Ops, 1995, 22(7):763-770.
[22] 杨阳,方春晖,李占超.基于最大熵的坝体健康评估专家模糊赋权模型[J].长江科学学院院报,2011,28(3):20-23. YANG Yang, FANG Chunhui, LI Zhanchao. Experts fuzzy weight model of dam health assessment based on maximum entropy[J]. Jounal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2011, 28(3):20-23.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

基于主客观赋权法的多目标多属性决策方法

Multiple objective and attribute decision making based on the subjective and objective weighting

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

多维度评价

本文评价

推荐阅读 0