您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(工学版)》

山东大学学报 (工学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5): 64-69.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2020.093

• 电气工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

虾米腰弯管内置导流板优化

祁金胜1(),曹洪振1,石岩2,杜文静2,王湛2,*()   

  1. 1. 山东电力工程咨询院有限公司, 山东 济南 250013
    2. 山东大学能源与动力工程学院, 山东 济南 250061
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-08 出版日期:2020-10-20 发布日期:2020-10-19
  • 通讯作者: 王湛 E-mail:qijinsheng@sdepci.com;wangzhan@sdu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:祁金胜(1977—),男,山东德州人,高级工程师,主要研究方向为电力设备. E-mail:qijinsheng@sdepci.com

Optimization of the inner deflector of the shrimp-waist elbow

Jinsheng QI1(),Hongzhen CAO1,Yan SHI2,Wenjing DU2,Zhan WANG2,*()   

  1. 1. Shandong Electric Power Engineering Consulting Institute Corporation, Jinan 250013, Shandong, China
    2. School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, Shandong, China
  • Received:2020-04-08 Online:2020-10-20 Published:2020-10-19
  • Contact: Zhan WANG E-mail:qijinsheng@sdepci.com;wangzhan@sdu.edu.cn

摘要:

为研究虾米腰弯管内流场分布,改善管内流场均匀性,采用Realizable k-ε模型对加装导流板前后的弯管内湍流二次流动进行三维数值模拟研究。结果表明:虾米腰弯管内未布置导流板时,在流体转弯后水平直管段出现较大范围的低速区,同时出现回流现象,气流分布极不均匀且阻力损失较大。布置导流板后,能有效改善弯管内流体的流动特性并降低系统能量损失。分析不同数量、不同结构、不同布置方式的导流板对弯管内流场均匀性、进出口压降的影响,提出虾米腰弯管内导流板最优布置方式为:导流板的数量为3块、中心角为60°、导流板均靠后布置。

关键词: 弯管, 流场优化, 阻力损失, 导流板, 数值模拟

Abstract:

In order to study the distribution of the flow field and improve the uniformity of the flow field in a shrimp-waist bend, a series of three-dimensional numerical simulation studies on the turbulent secondary flow in a bend before and after the installation of the deflector was carried out by using the Realizable k-ε model. The results showed that when the deflector was not arranged in the shrimp-waist bend pipe, a large range of low-speed zones appeared in the horizontal straight pipe section after the fluid turns, and a backflow phenomenon occured at the same time. The airflow distribution was extremely uneven and the pressure resistance was large. After the deflector was arranged, the flow characteristics of the fluid in the elbow were effectively improved and the energy loss of the system was reduced. Based on the analysis of the influence of different number, structure and arrangement of deflectors on the uniformity of flow field and pressure drop loss of the bend, the optimal arrangement of deflectors in the shrimp-waist bend was proposed as follows: the number of deflectors was 3, the deflectors′ center angle was 60°, and the deflectors were all arranged backward.

Key words: elbow, flow field optimization, resistance loss, deflector, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • TB126

图1

弯管几何模型"

图2

求解器和湍流模型的验证"

图3

网格数量无关性分析"

图4

弯管中心剖面压力分布"

图5

弯管中心剖面速度分布及流线图"

图6

不同数量导流板模型转弯后的Cv"

图7

不同数量导流板模型的入口、出口总阻力损失"

图8

布置三块导流板后弯管中心剖面压力分布"

图9

布置三块导流板后弯管中心剖面速度分布及流线图"

图10

模型转弯后流场均匀性随θ的变化"

图11

模型转弯后入口、出口总阻力损失随θ的变化"

图12

Cv不同导流板起止位置模型转弯后的"

图13

不同导流板起止位置模型的速度分布及流线图(θ=60°)"

1 STUDENT O Z , SVIRS′KA L M , Dzioba I R . Influence of the long-term operation of 12Kh1M1F steel from different zones of a bend of steam pipeline of a thermal power plant on its mechanical characteristics[J]. Materials Science, 2012, 48 (2): 239- 246.
doi: 10.1007/s11003-012-9498-6
2 KUAN B , YANG W , SCHWARZ M P . Dilute gas-solid two-phase flows in a curved duct bend: CFD simulation with experimental validation[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62 (7): 2068- 2088.
doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2006.12.054
3 陈冠益, 耿页, 原国栋, 等. 新型电厂烟道弯头的设计及数值模拟[J]. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版), 2015, 48 (6): 93- 99.
CHEN Guanyi , GENG Ye , YUAN Guodong , et al. Numerical simulation and design of new power plant-based flue duct bend[J]. Journal of Tianjin University(Science and Technology), 2015, 48 (6): 93- 99.
4 赵全斌, 薛朝囡, 刘明, 等. 火电厂烟风通道主要异形件优化研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2015, 36 (4): 780- 784.
ZHAO Quanbin , XUE Chaonan , LIU Ming , et al. Optimization on main types of major irregular parts for air & flue gas ducts in thermal power plant[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2015, 36 (4): 780- 784.
5 ZHANG Y , MCLAURY B S , SHIRAZI S A . Improvements of particle near-wall velocity and erosion predictions using a commercial CFD code[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2009, 131 (3): 031303.
doi: 10.1115/1.3077139
6 El-BEHERY S M , HAMED M H , IBRAHIM K A , et al. CFD evaluation of solid particles erosion in curved ducts[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2010, 132 (7): 071303.
doi: 10.1115/1.4001968
7 LIN Nan , LAN Huiqing , XU Yugong , et al. Effect of the gas-solid two-phase flow velocity on elbow erosion[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 26, 581- 586.
doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.06.054
8 刘荣堂, 王宇, 刘明, 等. 燃煤电站除尘器前烟道磨损特性与优化研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2019, 40 (4): 88- 92.
LIU Rongtang , WANG Yu , LIU Ming , et al. Investigation and optimization on erosion characteristics of the flue gas pipe before the dust collector in power plants[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2019, 40 (4): 88- 92.
9 于飞, 刘明, 王汀, 等. 弯头内气-固两相流动与管壁磨损特性研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2015, 36 (4): 796- 800.
YU Fei , LIU Ming , WANG Ting , et al. Numerical research on gas-solid two phase flow and erosion in elbows[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2015, 36 (4): 796- 800.
10 邹欢.锅炉尾部烟道烟气三维流场的数值模拟及均流装置的研究[D].济南:山东大学, 2013.
ZOU Huan. Numerical simulation of three-dimensional gas flow field in boiler tail flue and study on flow-equalizing equipment [D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2013.
11 TAYLOR A M K P . Curved ducts with strong secondary motion: velocity measurements of developing laminar and turbulent flow[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering-transactions of the Asme, 1982, 104 (3): 350- 359.
doi: 10.1115/1.3241850
12 KLIAFAS Y , Holt M . LDV measurements of a turbulent air-solid two-phase flow in a 90° bend[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 1987, 5 (2): 73- 85.
doi: 10.1007/BF00776177
13 ENAYET M M , GIBSON M M , TAYLOR A M K P , et al. Laser-doppler measurements of laminar and turbulent flow in a pipe bend[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 1982, 3 (4): 213- 219.
doi: 10.1016/0142-727X(82)90024-8
14 谢振华, 周艳荣. 90°方截面弯管内加装导流板的优化研究[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2009, 17 (4): 79- 85.
XIE Zhenhua , ZHOU Yanrong . Optimization research on guide plate installed in quadrate 90° curved duct[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2009, 17 (4): 79- 85.
15 周艳荣, 谢振华. 90°方截面弯管内气固两相流场的数值模拟[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2008, 28 (1): 50- 54.
ZHOU Yanrong , XIE Zhenhua . Numerical simulation of gas-solid two-phase flow in a 90° curved duct[J]. Journal of Xi′an University of Science and Technology, 2008, 28 (1): 50- 54.
16 于飞, 刘明, 李卫东, 等. 90°矩形截面弯头内置导流板的布置优化研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2015, 35 (2): 147- 152.
YU Fei , LIU Ming , LI Weidong , et al. Layout optimization of guide plates in a 90 degree elbow with rectangular cross section[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2015, 35 (2): 147- 152.
17 贾兴豪, 彭向和, 龙血松. 导流板改善弯管流场的数值模拟与优化[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33 (3): 139- 143.
JIA Xinghao , PENG Xianghe , LONG Xuesong . Numerical simulation and optimization of flow field in elbow pipes with baffle[J]. Journal of Southwest University(Natural Science), 2011, 33 (3): 139- 143.
18 王周君, 黎星华, 唐立军, 等. 矩形截面直角弯管内置导流板的优化研究[J]. 华电技术, 2019, 41 (8): 32- 37.
WANG Zhoujun , LI Xinghua , TANG Lijun , et al. Optimization research on deflectors installed in right-angle bend tube with rectangular sectior[J]. Huadian Techno-logy, 2019, 41 (8): 32- 37.
19 王宇, 何琪, 于飞, 等. 组合弯头内气固两相流动磨损特性的数值模拟与结构优化[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38 (3): 832- 839.
WANG Yu , HE Qi , YU Fei , et al. Numerical simulation of the erosion characteristics and structure optimization of elbows connection for gas-solid flow[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38 (3): 832- 839.
20 SUN hongchuang , QIN Jiang , HUANG Hongyan , et al. Numerical simulation of flow and heat transfer in a square rotating U-duct using hydrocarbon fuel[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 2019, 141 (3): 031701.
doi: 10.1115/1.4042299
[1] 刘启明,王文辉,潘英楠,高要辉,郑程程,贺鹏. 厚度缺陷对初支结构安全性的影响及风险评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2025, 55(5): 165-178.
[2] 义扬,肖映雄,余科. 任意多边形骨料混凝土细观模型的建立与数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2025, 55(1): 97-107.
[3] 陈文举, 陈俐企, 包春波, 朱启银, 惠冰, 庄培芝. 循环管道加热桥面融雪效能数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(6): 100-110.
[4] 马川义,冯豪杰,蒋红光,侯天新,姚占勇,杨为民. 吸水土工布对路基湿度控制效果的数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(4): 141-149.
[5] 韩超,王彤,陈德文,孙恩赐,李平,吴则祥,周冲,庄培芝. 基于耦合欧拉-拉格朗日方法的砂土中静压桩挤土效应数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(2): 143-152.
[6] 王钰鑫,吕思忠,姚望,林春金,张明,李召峰,张健,王衍升. 粉质黏土地层桩侧劈裂注浆参数设计与效果评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(6): 70-81.
[7] 张亚平,马唯婧,张宸硕,肖辉,张一鸣. 基于图像识别与CAE仿真技术的输变电塔一体化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(6): 122-130.
[8] 宋洋,罗志恒,张波,张宇,朱敏. 裂隙位置对类岩体短柱单轴压缩破坏形态影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(5): 121-131.
[9] 王心泉,王智猛,牛犇,蒋恒,冯春. 8度地震烈度区新民隧道出口处边坡的稳定性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(3): 23-30.
[10] 孙杰,张宏博,程钰,刘羽,张洪波,刘志鲲. 基于TDA填料的废旧轮胎条带加筋砂土边坡承载特性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(1): 49-59.
[11] 牛犇,张新伟,周玉,李婧,徐兴全,张一鸣. 基于连续-非连续元降雨工况三维边坡稳定性分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(1): 92-99.
[12] 郭鹏宁,刘巍,袁浩,冯硕,王延刚. 基于微元离散模型的螺旋挤压脱水效率分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(1): 114-121.
[13] 张一鸣,李赟鹏,李婧,丛俊余. 孔隙裂隙介质多场耦合数值计算进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(6): 63-78.
[14] 郑卫琴,许杰,孙杰,武科. 复合地层TBM隧道管片受力特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(4): 210-213.
[15] 章清涛,刘晓威,高健,孙玉海,闫庆亮,刘源,王昊. 坡顶荷载作用下废旧轮胎条带加筋边坡承载特性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(3): 70-79.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王素玉,艾兴,赵军,李作丽,刘增文 . 高速立铣3Cr2Mo模具钢切削力建模及预测[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(1): 1 -5 .
[2] 张永花,王安玲,刘福平 . 低频非均匀电磁波在导电界面的反射相角[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 22 -25 .
[3] 李 侃 . 嵌入式相贯线焊接控制系统开发与实现[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(4): 37 -41 .
[4] 施来顺,万忠义 . 新型甜菜碱型沥青乳化剂的合成与性能测试[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(4): 112 -115 .
[5] 孔祥臻,刘延俊,王勇,赵秀华 . 气动比例阀的死区补偿与仿真[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(1): 99 -102 .
[6] 陈瑞,李红伟,田靖. 磁极数对径向磁轴承承载力的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 81 -85 .
[7] 李可,刘常春,李同磊 . 一种改进的最大互信息医学图像配准算法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 107 -110 .
[8] 季涛,高旭,孙同景,薛永端,徐丙垠 . 铁路10 kV自闭/贯通线路故障行波特征分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 111 -116 .
[9] 浦剑1 ,张军平1 ,黄华2 . 超分辨率算法研究综述[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 27 -32 .
[10] 王丽君,黄奇成,王兆旭 . 敏感性问题中的均方误差与模型比较[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(6): 51 -56 .