您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（工学版）》

山东大学学报 (工学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (6): 92-100.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2020.277

• • 上一篇    下一篇

松散地层隧道进洞段管棚注浆加固效应分析

余俊1,翁贤杰2,樊文胜3,张连震4   

  1. 1. 江西省交通建设工程质量监督管理局, 江西 南昌 330008;2. 江西交通咨询有限公司, 江西 南昌 330008;3. 江西省高速公路投资集团有限公司宜春管理中心, 江西 宜春 336000;4. 中国石油大学(华东)储运与建筑工程学院, 山东 青岛 266580
  • 发布日期:2020-12-15
  • 作者简介:余俊(1973— ),女,江西鄱阳人,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事公路项目建设管理和施工技术研究工作. E-mail:597793525@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2017MEE070);江西省交通运输厅科技项目(2019C0001)

Analysis of pipe roof grouting reinforcement effect at tunnel entrance in loose stratum

YU Jun1, WENG Xianjie2, FAN Wensheng3, ZHANG Lianzhen4   

  1. 1. Jiangxi Province Traffic Construction Engineering Quality Supervision Administration, Nanchang 330008, Jiangxi, China;
    2. Jiangxi Traffic Consulting Company, Nanchang 330008, Jiangxi, China;
    3. Yichun Management Center, Jiangxi Provincial Expressway Investment Group Co., Ltd, Yichun 336000, Jiangxi, China;
    4. College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China
  • Published:2020-12-15

PDF (PC)

411

摘要： 依托江西萍莲高速莲花隧道,建立考虑松散地层隧道进洞段管棚注浆加固效应的隧道开挖三维有限元计算模型,实现不同管棚注浆加固参数对隧道开挖稳定性影响的定量分析,在数值计算过程中研究注浆加固区力学参数(弹性模量、黏聚力)、管棚间距、注浆半径等因素对隧道稳定性的影响,并将研究成果应用于依托工程中,验证数值计算结果的正确性。研究结果表明:在隧道进洞段,隧道拱顶区域与掌子面前下方区域存在塑性区,上述2个区域为隧道进洞开挖过程中最易失稳的区域;管棚注浆加固可有效限制围岩变形,降低围岩体积应变,且管棚注浆加固区可有效隔离拱顶区域的围岩塑性区,有利于保证隧道拱顶安全;在整个管棚注浆加固长度内,管棚最大沉降量出现在隧道开挖掌子面附近;管棚最大沉降量的绝对值与注浆加固区弹性模量及注浆半径负相关,而与管棚间距正相关,但管棚间距对管棚最大沉降量的影响程度相比其他2个因素小。

关键词: 岩土力学, 松散地层, 隧道, 管棚注浆, 加固效应

Abstract: Based on Lianhua Tunnel in Pinglian Express Way, three-dimensional calculation model was established to study excavation stability considering pipe roof grouting reinforcement effect. Effect of different pipe roof grouting parameters on excavation stability was analyzed quantitatively, such as mechanical parameters of grouted body, pipe roof interval, grouting radius. In the end, numerical simulation results were used and verified in engineering project. Research results showed that there existed plastic failure zone at vault and region below tunnel face. Pipe roof grouting method had effect on limiting deformation of surrounding rock, reducing volume strain of surrounding rock and cutting off connection between plastic failure zone on vault and tunnel. In whole affected area of pipe roof grouting, maximum settlement of pipe roof settlement appeared around tunnel face. Maximum settlement of pipe roof settlement was negatively related with elastic modulus of grouted body and grouting radius, positively related with pipe roof interval. However, influence level of pipe roof interval was lower than elastic modulus of grouted body or grouting radius.

Key words: rock and soil mechanics, loose stratum, tunnel, pipe roof grouting, reinforcement effect

中图分类号: 

  • TU45
[1] 李术才,张伟杰,张庆松,等. 富水断裂带优势劈裂注浆机制及注浆控制方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2014,35(3): 744-752. LI Shucai, ZHANG Weijie, ZHANG Qingsong, et al. Research on advantage-fracture grouting mechanism and controlled grouting method in water-rich fault zone[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(3):744-752.
[2] 张伟杰,李术才,魏久传,等. 富水破碎岩体帷幕注浆模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(9): 1627-1634. ZHANG Weijie, LI Shucai, WEI Jiuchuan, et al. Model tests on curtain grouting in water-rich broken rock mass[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(9): 1627-1634.
[3] 钱七虎. 地下工程建设安全面临的挑战与对策[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(10): 1945-1956. QIAN Qihu. Challenges faced by underground projects construction safety and countermeasures[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(10): 1945-1956.
[4] 耿大新,石钰锋,阳军生,等. 浅覆大断面隧道长大管棚超前支护受力研究[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(6): 98-103. GENG Daxin, SHI Yufeng, YANG Junsheng, et al. Research on forepoling force of long and large pipe roof for shallow tunnel large section under existing highway[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology.(Natural Science Edition), 2016, 44(6): 98-103.
[5] 伍振志,傅志锋,王静,等. 浅埋松软地层开挖中管棚注浆法的加固机理及效果分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(6): 1025-1029. WU Zhenzhi, FU Zhifeng, WANG Jing, et al. Study of support mechanism and effect of shed-pipe grouting technology for tunneling construction in shallow-buried soft stratum[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(6): 1025-1029.
[6] 张龙生,翁贤杰. 富水软弱围岩隧道塌方机理及治理技术研究[J]. 中外公路, 2017, 37(1): 173-179. ZHANG Longsheng, WENG Xianjie. Research on collapse mechanism and control technology of tunnel in water-rich and soft stratum[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2017, 37(1): 173-179.
[7] 陈峥,何平,颜杜民,等. 考虑土拱效应的管棚合理间距计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1993-2000. CHEN Zheng, HE Ping, YAN Dumin, et al. A method to calculate rational spacing between pipes in pipe roofs considering soil arching effects[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1993-2000.
[8] 高红杰,何平,陈峥. 深埋非对称连拱隧道过程荷载计算方法研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(6): 1059-1066. GAO Hongjie, HE Ping, CHEN Zheng. Calculation of process load of deep-buried asymmetric multi-arch tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(6): 1059-1066.
[9] 满帅,孔超,王海彦. 隧道洞口浅埋段管棚超前支护开挖进尺优化[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2013(10): 108-111. MAN Shuai, KONG Chao, WANG Haiyan. Optimization of Excavation Footage of Shallowly-buried Section of Tunnel Portal Supported by Advance Pipe Roof[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2013(10): 108-111.
[10] 郭璇,张鸿儒,蒙蛟,等. 软弱围岩隧道管棚预支护开挖土压分布模型试验[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2016, 35(6): 1214-1224. GUO Xuan, ZHANG Hongru, MENG Jiao, et al. Model test to earth pressure distribution on pipe roof of tunnels as pre-supporting system in weak surrounding rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 35(6): 1214-1224.
[11] 郭璇,张晓新,王梦恕. 弧形侧向抗力法的力法推导及例证[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(增刊2): 4080-4090. GUO Xuan, ZHANG Xiaoxin, WANG Mengshu. Derivation and validation of structural mechanics force method for sinusoidal curve lateral resistance method in tunnelling lining[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(Suppl.2): 4080-4090.
[12] 张明聚,林毅,黄明琦,等. 厦门翔安隧道洞口段管棚设计与施工[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2007, 33(10): 1056-1059. ZHANG Mingju, LIN Yi, HUANG Mingqi, et al. Degisn and construction of pipe roof at entrance of Ximen Xiangan tunnel[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2007, 33(10): 1056-1059.
[13] 孙志杰,申俊敏. 隧道洞口段不同围岩刚度下管棚的支护效果分析[J]. 华北水利水电学院学报, 2013, 34(6): 25-28. SUN Zhijie, SHEN Junmin. Support effect of pipe roof at tunnel entrance at different stiffness of surrounding rock[J]. Journal of North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power, 2013, 34(6): 25-28.
[14] 苟德明,阳军生,高世军. 下穿公路连拱隧道双层管棚预加固作用数值分析[J]. 长沙交通学院学报, 2008, 24(2): 16-22. GOU Deming, YANG Junsheng, GAO Shijun. Numerical analysis of pre-reinforcement action about double-layer pipe roof in multi arch tunnel under the existing highway[J]. Journal of Changsha Communications University, 2008, 24(2): 16-22.
[15] 董敏,董明星,阳军生. 下穿既有高速公路下隧道施工双层管棚对土层加固作用有限元数值分析[J]. 公路工程, 2014, 39(3): 284-289. DONG Min, DONG Mingxing, YANG Junsheng. Numerical Analysis of Finite Element for Double-deck Pipe Shed's Reinforcement for Soil Layer in Tunnel Construction under Expressway[J]. Highway Engineering, 2014, 39(3): 284-289.
[16] 钟放平. 下穿既有公路的土江冲隧道双层管棚设计及监测分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2007, 44(4): 36-40. ZHONG Fangping. Double-layer pipe roofing design and monitoring for Tujiangchong tunnel under-crossing an existing highway[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2007, 44(4): 36-40.
[1] 郭海坡,文毅然,杨为民,丁万涛. 城市硬岩下地铁隧道管片壁后注浆隔振优化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(4): 95-105.
[2] 罗彦斌,王思涵,陈建勋,王传武. 考虑中夹岩柱安全储备的深埋小净距隧道围岩压力计算方法[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(3): 81-93.
[3] 郝艳广,徐建升,明道贵,雷霆,邱明喜,陈迪杨. 锚杆加固作用下椭圆形深埋隧洞承载力分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(1): 131-140.
[4] 李鸿钊,张庆松,刘人太,陈新,辛勤,石乐乐. 浅埋地铁车站施工期地表变形风险预警[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(6): 82-91.
[5] 肖文斌,谢印标,郑扬,武科,陈榕,李秋雷,程睿哲. 活动断层下城市地铁隧道变形破坏与损伤[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(3): 1-13.
[6] 朱斌,王健,徐壮,罗小刚,孟栋,邢志豪,张政,武科. 新建盾构隧道下穿既有构筑物施工的力学机理[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(4): 175-182.
[7] 邢志豪,朱斌,王健,孙培芹,武科,徐嘉祥,孙杰,郑扬. 溶洞注浆加固的空间属性对地铁盾构隧道建设安全的影响效应[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(4): 183-190.
[8] 郑卫琴,许杰,孙杰,武科. 复合地层TBM隧道管片受力特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(4): 210-213.
[9] 耿麒,张俊杰,汪珂,路宇峰,谢立扬,叶敏. 基于FEM-SPH耦合的TBM滚刀切削仿真与试验研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(1): 93-102.
[10] 卢光兆,周博,徐锋,上官伟,王刚,张书博. 浅埋偏压隧道进洞施工围岩稳定分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2021, 51(4): 61-70.
[11] 王春国. 硬岩隧道施工通风系统优化与抑尘效果评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2021, 51(3): 52-60.
[12] 王春国. 复合地层全断面硬岩隧道掘进机下穿立交桥研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2021, 51(3): 45-51.
[13] 孙杰,武科,郑扬,李树忱,袁超,王修伟. 城市地铁TBM隧道掘进诱发既有建筑物变形的空间属性效应[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2021, 51(1): 32-38.
[14] 李连祥,张强,石锦江,刘嘉典,侯颖雪. 基坑开挖邻近隧道水平形变位移规律[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2021, 51(1): 46-52.
[15] 陈禹成,王朝阳,郭明,林鹏. 隐伏溶洞对隧道围岩稳定性影响规律及处治技术[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2020, 50(5): 33-43.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 侃 . 嵌入式相贯线焊接控制系统开发与实现[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(4): 37 -41 .
[2] 来翔 . 用胞映射方法讨论一类MKdV方程[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(1): 87 -92 .
[3] 余嘉元1 , 田金亭1 , 朱强忠2 . 计算智能在心理学中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 1 -5 .
[4] 陈瑞,李红伟,田靖. 磁极数对径向磁轴承承载力的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 81 -85 .
[5] 王波,王宁生 . 机电装配体拆卸序列的自动生成及组合优化[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 52 -57 .
[6] 张英,郎咏梅,赵玉晓,张鉴达,乔鹏,李善评 . 由EGSB厌氧颗粒污泥培养好氧颗粒污泥的工艺探讨[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(4): 56 -59 .
[7] 王丽君,黄奇成,王兆旭 . 敏感性问题中的均方误差与模型比较[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(6): 51 -56 .
[8] Yue Khing Toh1 ， XIAO Wendong2 ， XIE Lihua1 . 基于无线传感器网络的分散目标跟踪：实际测试平台的开发应用（英文）[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 50 -56 .
[9] 孙炜伟,王玉振. 考虑饱和的发电机单机无穷大系统有限增益镇定[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 69 -76 .
[10] 孙玉利,李法德,左敦稳,戚美 . 直立分室式流体连续通电加热系统的升温特性[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(6): 19 -23 .
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(工学版)》编辑部　
地址: 济南市山大南路27号（250100）　 电话: 0531-88366735　 E-mail: xbgxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发