您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（工学版）》

山东大学学报(工学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 83-88.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2015.387

• • 上一篇    下一篇

有限元强度折减法在边坡稳定分析中的应用

刘金1,李勤昌2,马秀媛1   

  1. 1. 山东大学土建与水利学院, 山东 济南 250061;2. 四川省遂宁市水务局, 四川 遂宁 629000
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-26 出版日期:2016-08-20 发布日期:2015-11-26
  • 通讯作者: 马秀媛(1965— ),女,山东蓬莱人,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为岩土工程渗流及稳定性.E-mail:maxiuyuan@sdu.edu.cn E-mail:ljaxd@foxmail.com
  • 作者简介:刘金(1991— ),女,河北沧州人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为岩土工程. E-mail:ljaxd@foxmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2015BAB07B05)

Application of strength reduction FEM method in slope stability analysis

LIU Jin1, LI Qinchang2, MA Xiuyuan1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, Shandong, China;
    2. Suining Water Authority of Sichuan Province, Suining 629000, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2015-11-26 Online:2016-08-20 Published:2015-11-26

PDF (PC)

802

摘要： 为研究渠河河堤跨河大桥桩基工程对河堤稳定性的影响,采用有限元方法对河堤边坡加固方案及施工过程进行稳定性计算分析。对渠河大桥处渠堤断面图进行概化,构建二维平面应变有限元计算模型;利用有限元强度折减法,借助PLAXIS软件实现对设计坝体加宽和桩基桩孔施工情况下边坡的稳定性分析。计算结果表明,当坝坡坡度调整为1.00∶3.00时,最小稳定安全系数达到1.179,满足规范要求值1.150;桩孔开挖过程中,边坡稳定安全系数均大于1.150,坝坡稳定性可以得到保证,但是桩孔孔壁存在渗透变形和塑性变形的安全隐患,需采取防护措施。

关键词: 坝体渗流, 桩基, 边坡稳定, 土石坝, 强度折减法

Abstract: To study the influence of Quhe embankment cross-river bridge pile foundation project on the embankment stability, the FEM was applied to analyze the reinforcement plan of the embankment slope and the construction process. By generalizing the embankment cross-section diagram of the Quhe bridge, a two-dimensional plane strain FEM calculation model was built. The strength reduction FEM method was employed to analyze the circumstances of the designed slope broadening and pile-hole construction. The calculation results showed that the minimum stability safety factor reached 1.179 and met the specification required value 1.150 when the slope gradient was adjusted to 1.00∶3.00. The slope stability safety factor were all larger than 1.150 during the pile hole excavation and the slope stability could be guaranteed, while the seepage deformation and plastic deformation safety problems of pile hole wall existed and protective measures should be taken.

Key words: earth dam seepage, strength reduction method, slope stability, earth-rock dams, pile foundation

中图分类号: 

  • TU43
[1] 白永年. 中国堤坝防渗加固新技术[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社,2001.
[2] 苏利军. 基于极限平衡法和有限元法的土质边坡稳定分析研究[D]. 成都:西华大学,2012. SU Lijun. Study of earth slope stability based on limit equilibrium method & finite element method[D]. Chengdu: Xihua University, 2012.
[3] 张炜. 极限平衡法研究现状[J]. 科技信息,2009(10):64-64. ZHANG Wei. The research status of the limit equilibrium method[J]. Science and Technology Information, 2009(10):64-64.
[4] 张宏洋,杨文海,陶宗涛,等. 土质边坡动力稳定数值分析方法评述[J]. 南水北调与水利科技,2012,10(6):171-175. ZHANG Hongyang, YANG Wenhai, TAO Zongtao, et al. Review on numerical analysis of dynamic stability of soil slope[J]. South-to-North Water Diversion and Water Science & Technology, 2012, 10(6):171-175.
[5] 陈祖煜. 土质边坡稳定分析[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社,2003.
[6] ZIENKIEWICZ O C, HUMPHESON C, LEWIS R W. Associated and non-associated viscous-plasticity and plasticity in soil mechanics[J]. Geotechnique, 1975, 5(4): 671-689.
[7] 关立军. 基于强度折减的土坡稳定分析方法研究[D]. 大连:大连理工大学,2003. GUAN Lijun. Study of dam slope stability analysis method based on strength reduction[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2003.
[8] 麦麦提明·依比布拉. 基于瑞典法和毕肖普法对比的边坡稳定性[J]. 水利科技与经济,2015,21(6):12-14. MAMATIMING·Yibibula. Slope stability study based on the Swedish method and the Bishop method[J]. Water Conservancy Science and Technology and Economy, 2015, 21(6):12-14.
[9] 宋琨,晏鄂川,毛伟,等. 广义Hoek-Brown准则中强度折减系数的确定[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(1):106-112. SONG Kun, YAN Echuan, MAO Wei, et al. Determination of shear strength reduction factor for generalized Hoek-Brown Criterion[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(1):106-112.
[10] 郑颖人,赵尚毅,宋雅坤. 有限元强度折减法研究进展[J]. 后勤工程学院学报,2005,21(3):1-6. ZHENG Yingren, ZHAO Shangyi, SONG Yakun. The research advancement of FEM strength reduction method[J]. Journal of Logistical Engineering University, 2005, 21(3):1-6.
[11] 郑颖人,赵尚毅. 有限元强度折减法在土坡与岩坡中的应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(19):3381-3388. ZHENG Yingren, ZHAO Shangyi. Application of strength reduction FEM in soil and rock slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23(19):3381-3388.
[12] 褚雪松,庞峰,李亮,等. 边坡稳定有限元强度折减法与极限平衡法对比[J]. 人民黄河,2011,33(10):93-95. CHU Xuesong, PANG Feng, LI Liang, et al. Comparative study on FEM strength reduction method and limit equilibrium method for the slope stability analysis[J]. Yellow River, 2011, 33(10):93-95.
[13] 贾超,张国荣. 基于强度折减法随机裂隙岩体结构稳定性分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版),2013,43(6):57-64. JIA Chao, ZHANG Guorong. Stability analysis of fandom fractured rock mass structure based on the strength reduction method[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2013, 43(6):57-64.
[14] 李广信. 高等土力学[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社,2004.
[15] 栾茂田,武亚军,年廷凯. 强度折减有限元法中边坡失稳的塑性区判据及其应用[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报,2003,23(3):1-8. LUAN Maotian, WU Yajun, NIAN Yankai. The plastic zone criterion and its application of slope failure in strength reduction finite element method[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2003, 23(3):1-8.
[16] GRIFFITHS D V, LANE P A. Slope stability analysis by finite[J]. Geotechnique, 1999, 49(3):387-403.
[17] 曹先锋. 边坡稳定分析的温控参数折减有限元法[J]. 岩土工程学报,2006, 28(11):2039-2042. CAO Xianfeng. Temperature driving strength reduction method for slope stability analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(11):2039-2042.
[18] 陈力华,靳晓光. 有限元强度折减法中边坡三种失效判据的适用性研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2012,45(9):136-146. CHEN Lihua, JIN Xiaoguang. Study on the applicability of three criteria for slope instability using finite element strength reduction method[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2012, 45(9):136-146.
[19] 裴利剑,屈本宁,钱闪光. 有限元强度折减法边坡失稳判据的统一性[J]. 岩土力学,2010,31(10):3337-3341. PEI Lijian, QU Benning, QIAN Shanguang. Uniformity of slope instability criteria of strength reduction with FEM[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(10):3337-3341.
[20] 陈国庆,黄润秋,石豫川,等. 基于动态和整体强度折减法的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(2):243-256. CHEN Guoqing, HUANG Runqiu, SHI Yuchuan, et al. Stability analysis of slope based on dynamic and whole strength reduction methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(2):243-256.
[21] 陶煜,刘卫群. 裂隙岩体渗流-应力耦合等效渗流阻模型[J]. 岩土力学,2012,33(7):2041-2047. TAO Yu, LIU Weiqun. An equivalent seepage resistance model with seepage-stress coupling for fractured rock mass[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(7):2041-2047.
[22] 杨琛. 密集挖孔桩桩孔稳定性分析[D]. 长沙:中南大学,2014. YANG Chen. Analysis on the stability of pile holes in dense hole digging piles[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2014.
[23] 武科,马秀媛,尚蕾. 土坝加固效果分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版),2004,34(2):80-83. WU Ke, MA Xiuyuan, SHANG Lei. An analysis of the solid dam reinforcement[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2004, 34(2):80-83.
[24] 王为. 基于状态相关性的土体渗透变形特性试验研究[D]. 长沙:长沙理工大学,2013. WANG Wei. Experimental research on seepage failure of soils based on correlations of states[D]. Changsha: Changsha University of Science & Technology, 2013.
[25] 刘建钊,史魏. 复杂地质旋挖组合成桩工艺[J]. 施工技术,2014(S1):19-22. LIU Jianzhao, SHI Wei. Combined pile forming technology under complex geological conditions[J]. Construction Technology, 2014(S1):19-22.
[26] 卢春华. 非金属同径孔壁支护技术[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2013,41(3):87-89. LU Chunhua. Nonmetal and isodiametric sidewall strengthening technology[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2013, 41(3):87-89.
[1] 刘健,胡南琦,徐宝军,岳秀丽,齐泊良,仲奇. 水泥基土石坝防渗注浆材料试验[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 39-45.
[2] 吕国仁,张群,牛奔,高全亭,武照收. 高层建筑桩基施工对邻近建筑物的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(1): 48-58.
[3] 朱登元, 姚占勇, 葛守仁. 柱式桥台前坡改造数值分析与现场检测[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(3): 86-94.
[4] 贾超, 张国荣. 基于强度折减法随机裂隙岩体结构稳定性分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(6): 57-64.
[5] 朱登元1,2,管延华1*. 毛细水作用对粉土路基稳定性的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2012, 42(1): 93-98.
[6] 杨文东1,张强勇1*,宋萌勃2,杨佳1. 基于破坏接近度和强度折减法的边坡稳定性评价[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(6): 82-87.
[7] 李富荣1,2, 何山1, 王志华2. 地震作用下大型桥梁群桩基础动水压力效应分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(4): 102-107.
[8] 韩雪. 平庄西露天煤矿滑坡灾害远程监测实例分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(4): 116-120.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程代展，李志强. 非线性系统线性化综述(英文)[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(2): 26 -36 .
[2] 王勇, 谢玉东.

大流量管道煤气的控制技术研究

[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(2): 70 -74 .
[3] 刘新1 ，宋思利1 ，王新洪2 . 石墨配比对钨极氩弧熔敷层TiC增强相含量及分布形态的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(2): 98 -100 .
[4] 田芳1,张颖欣2,张礼3,侯秀萍3,裘南畹3. 新型金属氧化物薄膜气敏元件基材料的开发[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(2): 104 -107 .
[5] 陈华鑫, 陈拴发, 王秉纲. 基质沥青老化行为与老化机理[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(2): 125 -130 .
[6] 赵延风1,2, 王正中1,2 ,芦琴1,祝晗英3 . 梯形明渠水跃共轭水深的直接计算方法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(2): 131 -136 .
[7] 李士进,王声特,黄乐平. 基于正反向异质性的遥感图像变化检测[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 1 -9 .
[8] 蔡晓军１ ,张擎１ ,柴乔林１ ，孔苏丽2 . 基于能量均衡的n分多路径路由算法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(2): 141 -145 .
[9] 赵科军 王新军 刘洋 仇一泓. 基于结构化覆盖网的连续 top-k 联接查询算法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(5): 32 -37 .
[10] 赵治广,王登杰,田云飞 . 基于灰色理论的路基沉降研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2007, 37(3): 86 -88 .
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(工学版)》编辑部　
地址: 济南市山大南路27号（250100）　 电话: 0531-88366735　 E-mail: xbgxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发