您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(工学版)》

山东大学学报(工学版)

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄泛区公路地基压实标准的研究

姚占勇   

  1. 山东大学土建与水利学院,山东济南250061
  • 收稿日期:2007-03-23 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-12-24 发布日期:2007-12-24
  • 通讯作者: 姚占勇

Research on compaction standard of highway  foundation in the flooding area of yellow river

YAO Zhan-yong   

  1. School of Civil Engineering,Shandong University,Jinan 250061,China
  • Received:2007-03-23 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-12-24 Published:2007-12-24
  • Contact: YAO Zhan-yong

摘要: 采用有限差分的计算方法,分析了黄泛区公路地基在不同压实度和压实深度条件下的沉降规律,提出了地基的压实标准和处置技术措施.研究认为,对高度<6m的路基,保证90%的压实度对减少路基的工后沉降变形至关重要.对高度>6m的路基,提高地基压实度,特别是将压实度由90%提高到93%,对降低地基沉降的作用不大.加大地基的压实深度,与提高压实度表现出相似的规律性,但对降低地基沉降的效果更明显.应根据路基高度提出地基的压实控制标准.路基高度≤2m,地基表层30㎝压实度应≥93%;路基高度2~6m,地基表层30㎝压实度应≥90%;路基高度>6m,地基表层30㎝压实度应≥85%.指出采用强夯、冲击碾压实地基,是黄泛区经济有效的工程技术措施.

关键词: 公路, 地基, 沉降, 有限差分

Abstract: Using the computaion methods of finite difference, the sedimentation law of highway foundation in the flooding area of Yellow River is analyzed in different degree of compaction and depths of compaction, the compaction standard and technical measures are put forth. It is proved that it is important to reduce the settlement after the completion of roadbed, when the compaction is more than 90% for the situation with the roadbed height less than 6m. When the roadbed is heigher than 6m, the compaction degree raising has little effect on reducing the deformation of roadbed, of, especially for the compaction ranging in 90%~93%. It exhibits the same regulation in enhancing the compaction depth as that in raising the degree of compaction, which has evident effects on reducing the foundation sedimentation . Therefore, compaction standard of highway foundation should be put forth according to roadbed height. When the roadbed height is ≤2m, the degree of compaction should be ≥93% within the scope of 30cm of foundation surface layer. When the roadbed height is in the range of 2~6m, the compaction degree should be higher than 90% within the scope of 30cm of foundation surface layer. When the roadbed height is more than 6m, the degree of compaction should be ≥85% within the scope of 30cm of foundation surface layer. It is pointed out that dynamic compaction and pound grinding is the most economic and valid engineering technical measures in the flooding area of Yellow River.

Key words: highway, subgrade, deformation, finite difference

中图分类号: 

  • TU4
[1] 王忠啸,崔新壮,崔社强,张磊,车华桥,苏俊伟. 咸水区水泥土桩劣化及改性对道路复合地基的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 69-77.
[2] 许玮,冀肖彤,刘海波,韩元凯,陈芳,张程琳. 电动汽车应急救援站选址及资源配置[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(6): 115-120.
[3] 李建祥,车长明,韩元凯,陈芳,张程琳. 高速公路电动汽车应急充电救援方案综述[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(6): 121-127.
[4] 吕国仁,张群,牛奔,高全亭,武照收. 高层建筑桩基施工对邻近建筑物的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(1): 48-58.
[5] 刘浩广,王海威,曾慧平,伍家驹. 高速公路网络演化模型的复杂性及连通性[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(4): 47-53.
[6] 宋修广,周健,侯越,葛智,孙仁娟. 抗分散透水性混凝土性能研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(4): 60-67.
[7] 孙克国, 仇文革, 王中平, 高笑雁, 龚伦, 孔超. 高速公路改扩建工程对高铁隧道的近接施工影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(5): 70-76.
[8] 吕国仁, 周浩, 李立, 高全亭, 姜竹昌. 隧道水平旋喷加固效果及不同工法对稳定性影响分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(3): 80-85.
[9] 杜金辉, 张承, 张建, 慕金波. 青岛市土壤酸沉降承压度评价[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(2): 67-74.
[10] 战永亮1,舒计城2,邵广彪2,孙剑平2. 锚拉式支挡结构的变形与内力实测分析研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(1): 69-74.
[11] 弋晓明1,2,王松根2,宋修广1*,臧亚囡1. 路基容许不均匀沉降控制指标的理论分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(5): 68-73.
[12] 张娜1,2,崔新壮1,2*,张炯1,2,周亚旭1,2,高智珺1,2,隋伟1,2. 路堤荷载作用下透水性混凝土桩减压降沉效应研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(4): 80-86.
[13] 孙岚,罗钊,吴英杰,王一蕾. 面向路网限制的位置隐私保护算法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2012, 42(5): 96-101.
[14] 崔新壮1,2,王聪1,2,周亚旭1,2,张娜1,2,高智珺1,2. 透水性混凝土桩减压减震耦合抗震机理研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2012, 42(4): 86-91.
[15] 米刚1,王昊2*. 高速公路中央分隔带绿化渗灌技术研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2012, 42(3): 138-142.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!