山东大学学报 (工学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 103-113.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2023.004
• 机器学习与数据挖掘 • 上一篇
齐明皓1,2,赵卓峰1,2*,丁维龙1,2
QI Minghao1,2, ZHAO Zhuofeng1,2*, DING Weilong1,2
摘要： 以第四方平台模式下的科技服务协同为研究案例,通过活动理论对社会-信息服务协同要素进行分析,提出社会-信息服务协同核心建模元素及模型定义,给出基于BPMN2.0扩展的定义语言,设计并实现可视化的社会-信息服务协同建模工具及相关支撑系统。通过具体的科技服务协同案例验证了本研究方法可以有效支持社会-信息服务协同的建模及管理需求。
中图分类号:
| [1] 孙希有.服务型社会的来临[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2010: 15-25. [2] PATWARDHAN K M. Makingsense of a service-oriented architecture(SOA)governance framework in the digital ecosystem utilizing a sociotechnical approach[C] //2019 IEEE 12th Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications(SOCA), 2019. Gaoxiong, China: IEEE, 2019: 49-54. [3] WIERINGA R J, ENGELSMAN W, GORDIJN J, et al. A business ecosystem architecture modeling framework[C] // 2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics(CBI), 2019. Moscow, Russia: IEEE, 2019, 1: 147-156. [4] 吴朝晖. 现代服务业与服务计算:新模型新定义新框架[J]. 中国计算机学会通讯, 2016(4): 57-62. WU Zhaohui. Modern serviceindustry and service computing: new models, new definitions, and new frameworks [J]. Communications of the China Computer Federation, 2016(4): 57-62. [5] DREWS P, INGRID S. From enterprise architecture to business ecosystem architecture:stages and challenges for extending architectures beyond organizational boundaries[C] //IEEE 18th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing(EDOC), 2014. Ulm, Germany: IEEE, 2014: 13-22. [6] ROHDE M, BROEDNER P, STEVENS G, et al. Grounded design-a praxeological is research perspective[J]. Journal of Information Technology, 2017, 32(2): 163-179. [7] 吕巾娇, 刘美凤, 史力范. 活动理论的发展脉络与应用探析[J]. 现代教育技术, 2007(1):8-14. L(¨overU)Jinjiao, LIU Meifeng, SHI Lifan. Developmenttrends and application analysis of activity theory[J]. Modern Educational Technology, 2007(1): 8-14. [8] HINKELMANN K.Business process flexibility and decision-aware modeling: the knowledge work designer[C] //Domain-Specific Conceptual Modeling. Berlin, Germany: Springer International, 2016: 397-414. [9] AALST W. Modeling and analyzing interorganizational work-flows[C] //Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design,1998. Fukushima, Japan: IEEE, 1998: 262-272. [10] YOUSFI A, BAUER C, SAIDI R, et al. uBPMN: a BPMN extension for modeling ubiquitous business processes[J]. Information and Software Technology, 2016, 74: 55-68. [11] WIERINGA R J, ENGELSMAN W, GRDIJIN J, et al. A business ecosystem architecture modeling framework[C] //2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics(CBI), 2019. Moscow, Russia: IEEE, 2019:147-156. [12] BARDRAM J, DORYAB A. Activity analysis: applying activity theory to analyze complex work in hospitals[C] // Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Hangzhou, China: CSCW, 2011: 455-464. [13] COSTA P D, MIELKE I T, PEREIRA I, et al. A model-driven approach to situations: situation modeling and rule-based situation detection[C] //2012 IEEE 16th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference,2012. Beijing, China: IEEE, 2012: 154-163. [14] SINGH P M, VEELENTURF L P, WOENSEL T. Modeling complex business environments for context aware systems[M]. Grenoble: Springer, 2020: 242-256. [15] LUIS J, RAMÓN S, CHIOTTI O, et al. A BPMN 2.0 extension to define the resource perspective of business process models[J]. Conferencia lberoamericana de Software Engineering, 2011, 1: 45-56. |
| [1] | 李 侃 . 嵌入式相贯线焊接控制系统开发与实现[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(4): 37-41 . |
|
||
