您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(工学版)》

山东大学学报 (工学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4): 115-122.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2019.029

• 电气工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

大规模光伏接入受端电网方案综合决策

刘晓明1(),丛旖旎2,3,李文博3,刘玉田3   

  1. 1. 国网山东省电力公司经济技术研究院, 山东 济南 250021
    2. 国网山东省电力公司烟台供电公司, 山东 烟台 264000
    3. 山东大学电网智能化调度与控制教育部重点实验室, 山东 济南 250061
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-21 出版日期:2019-08-20 发布日期:2019-08-06
  • 作者简介:刘晓明(1984—),男,山东烟台人,高级工程师,硕士,主要研究方向电网规划和新能源发电技术. E-mail: 416582710@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国网山东省电力公司科技资助项目

Comprehensive decision-making method for large-scale photovoltaic system integrated to receiving-end power grid

Xiaoming LIU1(),Yini CONG2,3,Wenbo LI3,Yutian LIU3   

  1. 1. Economic & Technology Research Institute, State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China
    2. Yantai Power Supply Company, State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company, Yantai 264000, Shandong, China
    3. Key Laboratory of Power System Intelligent Dispatch and Control of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, Shandong, China
  • Received:2019-01-21 Online:2019-08-20 Published:2019-08-06
  • Supported by:
    国网山东省电力公司科技资助项目

摘要:

提出一种基于模糊层次分析和逼近理想解排序的方案评估比选方法,用于大规模光伏接入受端电网方案的综合决策。以系统安全稳定性、光伏出力间歇性、经济性和可扩展性为准则,建立大规模光伏电站接入受端电网方案评估体系,对候选方案各指标进行量化评估;考虑决策者主观偏好的模糊性质,采用模糊层次分析法确定评估体系中各指标的权重,并利用逼近理想解排序法进行多属性决策得到推荐接入方案。山东电网算例展示所提综合决策方法的全过程,结果表明利用该方法可直观地反映各候选方案的优劣,并给出合理的决策结果。

关键词: 光伏电站, 综合决策, 模糊层次分析, 逼近理想解排序

Abstract:

This paper proposed a comprehensive decision-making method based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) for large-scale photovoltaic system integrated to receiving-end power grid. A decision-making evaluation index system was established to quantify the indexes of grid-connection schemes, in which main influence factors considered were security and stability, intermittence of PV, economy, and extendibility. Taking into account the fuzziness of the preferences of decision-makers, the FAHP algorithm was applied to determine the weights of indexes. The TOPSIS algorithm was adopted to make the multi-objective decision between schemes to get the TOPSIS solution as the best grid-connection scheme. The case study on Shandong power grid demonstrated the whole process of the comprehensive decision-making method and indicated that the method could reflect the merits and demerits of different schemes visually, with which we could get the reasonable decision results.

Key words: photovoltaic system, comprehensive decision-making, FAHP, TOPSIS

中图分类号: 

  • TM715

图1

大规模光伏电站接入受端电网方案评估体系"

图2

光伏接入点附近局部结构图"

表1

初筛选指标计算结果"

方案序号电压合格率/%过载线路条数N-1通过率/%
110292.68
210000
310000
410000
510000

表2

各方案评估指标计算结果"

指标方案二方案三方案四方案五
A11/s0.2600.2820.2780.272
A21/%32.3132.9532.8932.01
A22/%38.5138.1138.1038.21
B111316189
B12/pu2.273.844.942.26
B21/%1.250.630.720.67
C11/万元8 91414 57913 1579 861
C21/%1.621.751.731.41
C22/%41.1538.6739.4739.99
D1/GW1.882.062.052.11

图3

标准化指标对比图"

表3

评估指标权重值"

准则层一级指标二级指标总排序权重
A(0.348)A1(0.6)A11(1)0.208 80
A2(0.4)A21(0.7)0.097 44
A22(0.3)0.041 76
B(0.348)B1(0.6)B11(0.7)0.146 16
B12(0.3)0.062 64
B2(0.4)B21(1)0.139 20
C(0.196)C1(0.6)C11(1)0.117 60
C2(0.4)C21(0.8)0.062 72
C22(0.2)0.015 68
D(0.108)D1(1)0.108 00
1 EFTEKHARNEJAD S , VITTAL V , HEYDT G T , et al. Impact of increased penetration of photovoltaic generation on power systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013, 28 (2): 893- 901.
doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2216294
2 张恒旭, 施啸寒, 刘玉田, 等. 我国西北地区可再生能源基地对全球能源互联网构建的支撑作用[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46 (4): 96- 102.
ZHANG Hengxu , SHI Xiaohan , LIU Yutian , et al. Support of the renewable energy base in northwest of China on the construction of global energy interconnection[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Engineering Science), 2016, 46 (4): 96- 102.
3 张沈习, 李珂, 程浩忠, 等. 考虑相关性的间歇性分布式电源选址定容规划[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2015, 39 (8): 53- 58.
ZHANG Shenxi , LI Ke , CHENG Haozhong , et al. Optimal siting and sizing of intermittent distributed generator considering correlations[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2015, 39 (8): 53- 58.
4 赵争鸣, 雷一, 贺凡波, 等. 大容量并网光伏电站技术综述[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2011, 35 (12): 101- 107.
ZHAO Zhengming , LEI Yi , HE Fanbo , et al. Overview of large-scale grid-connected photovoltaic power plants[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2011, 35 (12): 101- 107.
5 KROPOSKI B . Integrating high levels of variable renewable energy into electric power systems[J]. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 2017, 5 (6): 831- 837.
doi: 10.1007/s40565-017-0339-3
6 侯玉强, 李威. 大规模光伏接纳对电网安全稳定的影响及相关制约因素分析[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2013, 29 (4): 73- 77.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3814.2013.04.014
HOU Yuqiang , LI Wei . Influence of integration of large-scale photovoltaic on grid and key factors restricting its accepted capacity[J]. Power System and Clean Energy, 2013, 29 (4): 73- 77.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3814.2013.04.014
7 丁明, 王伟胜, 王秀丽, 等. 大规模光伏发电对电力系统影响综述[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2014, 34 (1): 1- 14.
DING Ming , WANG Weisheng , WANG Xiuli , et al. A review on the effect of large-scale PV generation on power systems[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2014, 34 (1): 1- 14.
8 曾祥军, 李凤婷. 光伏电站接入系统方案分析[J]. 电测与仪表, 2016, 53 (1): 84- 89.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1390.2016.01.015
ZENG Xiangjun , LI Fengting . Analysis on the scheme of a PV plant connected to grid system[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2016, 53 (1): 84- 89.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1390.2016.01.015
9 丛旖旎, 曹增功, 牟宏, 等. 百万千瓦级滩涂光伏电站接入电网分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47 (6): 77- 82.
CONG Yini , CAO Zenggong , MU Hong , et al. Scheme analysis on GW-scale coastal mud flat PV system connected to power grid[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Engineering Science), 2017, 47 (6): 77- 82.
10 赵云飞, 陈金富. 层次分析法及其在电力系统中的应用[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2004, 24 (9): 85- 87.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6047.2004.09.025
ZHAO Yunfei , CHEN Jinfu . Analytic hierarchy process and its application in power system[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2004, 24 (9): 85- 87.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6047.2004.09.025
11 黄文杰, 傅砾, 肖盛. 采用改进模糊层次分析法的风速预测模型[J]. 电网技术, 2010, 34 (7): 164- 168.
HUANG Wenjie , FU Li , XIAO Sheng . A predictive model of wind speed based on improved fuzzy analytical hierarchy process[J]. Power System Technology, 2010, 34 (7): 164- 168.
12 卜婷婷, 张建华, 吴旭, 等. 基于熵权法和改进层次分析法的电力系统黑启动方案评估[J]. 现代电力, 2013, 30 (5): 36- 40.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2322.2013.05.007
BU Tingting , ZHANG Jianhua , WU Xu , et al. Assessment on power system black-start schemes based on entropy-method and improved analytic hierarchy process algorithm[J]. Modern Electric Power, 2013, 30 (5): 36- 40.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2322.2013.05.007
13 王佳明, 刘文颖, 李群炬, 等. 基于多层次模糊综合评价模型的短路电流限制措施优化配置[J]. 电网技术, 2011, 35 (11): 125- 129.
WANG Jiaming , LIU Wenying , LI Qunju , et al. Optimal configuration of short-circuit current limitation measures based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model[J]. Power System Technology, 2011, 35 (11): 125- 129.
14 叶华, 刘玉田, 牛新生. 500 kV-220 kV电磁环网开环方案模糊综合评价[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2006, 26 (7): 1- 5.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6047.2006.07.001
YE Hua , LIU Yutian , NIU Xinsheng . Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of opening schemes for 500 kV-220 kV electromagnetic loop[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2006, 26 (7): 1- 5.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6047.2006.07.001
15 王春义, 刘玉田. 输电网架恢复的动态优化决策方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2011, 35 (2): 23- 27.
WANG Chunyi , LIU Yutian . A dynamic optimization decision-making method for power system skeleton restoration[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2011, 35 (2): 23- 27.
16 徐泽水. 模糊互补判断矩阵排序的一种算法[J]. 系统工程学报, 2001, 16 (4): 311- 314.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5781.2001.04.012
XU Zeshui . Algorithm for priority of fuzzy compleemntary judgement matrix[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2001, 16 (4): 311- 314.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5781.2001.04.012
17 吕跃进. 基于模糊一致矩阵的模糊层次分析法的排序[J]. 模糊系统与数学, 2002, 16 (2): 79- 85.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7402.2002.02.014
LÜ Yuejin . Weight calculation method of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process[J]. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, 2002, 16 (2): 79- 85.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7402.2002.02.014
[1] 孙东磊, 鉴庆之, 李智琦, 韩学山, 王明强, 陈博, 付一木. 源网协调的电力系统均匀性规划[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(5): 92-101.
[2] 李文升, 王宪, 米元泽, 曹永吉, 刘晓明, 张恒旭, 刘子菡. 考虑风光多维时空相关性的电源规划方法[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(1): 111-119.
[3] 李笋,王超,张桂林,徐志根,程涛,王义元,王瑞琪. 基于支持向量回归的短期负荷预测[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(6): 52-56.
[4] 吉兴全,韩国正,李可军,傅荣荣,朱仰贺. 基于密度的改进K均值聚类算法在配网区块划分中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(4): 41-46.
[5] 于松青, 侯承昊, 孙英涛. 基于系统动力学的山东省电力需求预测[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(6): 91-98.
[6] 葛维春,李昭,赵东,李振宇,叶青,傅予,于娜. 含电极式电锅炉的地区电网电源侧综合效益分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2020, 50(5): 90-98.
[7] 孙东磊,孙可奇,杨金叶,曹永吉,袁振华,刘冬,张恒旭. 考虑灵活性需求的电力系统优化调度[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(1): 120-127.
[8] 陈吟枫,肖晋宇,侯金鸣,江涵,赵小令,施啸寒. 基于精细化运行模拟的源-网-储协同短期扩展规划[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(6): 156-166.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张永花,王安玲,刘福平 . 低频非均匀电磁波在导电界面的反射相角[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 22 -25 .
[2] 李 侃 . 嵌入式相贯线焊接控制系统开发与实现[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(4): 37 -41 .
[3] 孔祥臻,刘延俊,王勇,赵秀华 . 气动比例阀的死区补偿与仿真[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(1): 99 -102 .
[4] 来翔 . 用胞映射方法讨论一类MKdV方程[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(1): 87 -92 .
[5] 余嘉元1 , 田金亭1 , 朱强忠2 . 计算智能在心理学中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 1 -5 .
[6] 陈瑞,李红伟,田靖. 磁极数对径向磁轴承承载力的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 81 -85 .
[7] 王波,王宁生 . 机电装配体拆卸序列的自动生成及组合优化[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 52 -57 .
[8] 季涛,高旭,孙同景,薛永端,徐丙垠 . 铁路10 kV自闭/贯通线路故障行波特征分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 111 -116 .
[9] 秦通,孙丰荣*,王丽梅,王庆浩,李新彩. 基于极大圆盘引导的形状插值实现三维表面重建[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(3): 1 -5 .
[10] 张英,郎咏梅,赵玉晓,张鉴达,乔鹏,李善评 . 由EGSB厌氧颗粒污泥培养好氧颗粒污泥的工艺探讨[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(4): 56 -59 .