您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（工学版）》

山东大学学报(工学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 88-94.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2016.153

• • 上一篇    下一篇

不同扩径体数量、位置对支盘桩承载力的影响

李连祥1,2,李先军1,2   

  1. 1.山东大学土建与水利学院, 山东 济南 250061;2.山东大学基坑与深基础工程技术研究中心, 山东 济南 250061
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-10 出版日期:2016-10-20 发布日期:2016-05-10
  • 作者简介:李连祥(1966— ),男,河北唐山人,教授,博士,主要研究方向为基坑与深基础工程. E-mail:jk_doctor@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    济南市科技计划基金资助项目(201201145)

Influence of squeezed branch pile bearing capacity on different numbers and positions of enlarged parts

LI Lianxiang1,2, LI Xianjun1,2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, Shandong, China;
    2. Engineering Research Center of Foundation Pit and Deep Foundation, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, Shandong, China
  • Received:2016-05-10 Online:2016-10-20 Published:2016-05-10

PDF (PC)

853

摘要： 通过有限元模拟现场试验并以此设计34组对比模型,全面深入研究支盘桩承载性状,揭示内部工作机理。以相同扩径体数量的纵向对比,总结出侧阻力主要在前期发挥作用,端阻力主要在后期发挥作用,扩径体位置越深,支盘桩后期承载力越高,沉降曲线越缓;以不同扩径体数量的横向对比,发现承载力提高效率和扩径端阻力发挥效率的变化规律:扩径体数量设置过多,会使桩基承载力提高效率降低,扩径端阻力也不能正常发挥。为使经济性达到最优,建议最佳扩径体数量为2~3个,为工程设计提供参考。

关键词: 扩径体位置, 承载力净增长率, 扩径体, 扩径端阻力, 扩径体数量, ABAQUS

Abstract: The squeezed branch pile behavior and its internal working mechanism had been deeply investigated by simulating the field test and designing34 comparison models. According to vertical comparison on piles with the same number of enlarged parts, conclusions had been made that skin friction played a main role in the former stage but enlarged part resistance played later. A deeper enlarged part position could lead to a higher later-stage bearing capacity and a slower settlement curve. While lateral comparison on piles with different enlarged part number showed bearing capacity improving efficiency rule and enlarged part resistance efficiency rule: too many enlarged parts could reduce the bearing capacity improving efficiency and affect the performance of the enlarged parts. To achieve the best in economy, the suggested optimal number of enlarged parts was 2-3, which could provide reference for engineering.

Key words: enlarged part number, enlarged part resistance, ABAQUS, net growth rate of bearing capacity, enlarged part, enlarged part position

中图分类号: 

  • TU473
[1] 陈轮,常冬冬,李广信. DX单桩承载力有限元分析[J]. 工程力学,2002,19(6):67-72. CHEN Lun, CHANG Dongdong, LI Guangxin. Finite element analysis of bearing capacity of a single DX pile[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2002, 19(6):67-72.
[2] 陈立宏,唐松涛,贺德新. DX群桩现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2011,32(4):1003-1007. CHEN Lihong, TANG Songtao, HE Dexin. Field test study of DX piles[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(4):1003-1007.
[3] HORIGUCHI T, KARKEE M B. Load tests on bored PHC nodular piles in different ground conditions and the bearing capacity based on simple soil parameters[J]. Proceedings of Technical Report of Japanese Architectural Society, 1995(1):89-94.
[4] HONDA T, HIRAI Y, SATO E. Uplift capacity of belled and multi-belled piles in dense sand[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2011, 51(3):483-496.
[5] ZHOU J J, WANG K H, GONG X N, et al. Bearing capacity and load transfer mechanism of a static drilled rooted nodular pile in soft soil area[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A(Applied Physics & Engineering), 2013, 14(10):705-719.
[6] 钱德玲. 挤扩支盘桩的荷载传递规律及FEM模拟研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2002, 24(3):371-375. QIAN Deling. Study on load transfer law and FEM simulation of squeezed branch pile[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(3):371-375.
[7] 钱德玲. 挤扩支盘桩受力性状研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2003, 22(3):494-499. QIAN Deling. Study on behavior of squeezed branch pile[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2003, 22(3):494-499.
[8] 卢成原,王珊珊,孟凡丽. 非饱和粉土中模型支盘桩在重复荷载作用下的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(4):603-607. LU Chengyuan, WANG Shanshan, MENG Fanli. Model tests on piles with branches and plates in unsaturated silt under cyclic loads[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(4):603-607.
[9] 卢成原,贾颖栋,周玲. 重复荷载下模型支盘桩工程性状的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(2):431-436. LU Chengyuan, JIA Yingdong, ZHOU Ling. Project performance study of model piles with branches and plates under repeated load in silty clay[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(2):431-436.
[10] 吴永红,郑刚,闫澍旺. 多支盘钻孔灌注桩基础沉降计算理论与方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2000, 22(5):528-531. WU Yonghong, ZHENG Gang, YAN Shuwang. A settlement prediction method for multi-under-reamed cast-in-situ pile foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2000, 22(5):528-531.
[11] 张延庆,苑辉,屈展,等. 挤扩支盘桩抗拔性能试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2008, 25(增刊1):82-85. ZHANG Yanqing, YUAN Hui, QU Zhan, et al. Experimental study on the anti-pulling behavior of the squeezed cast-in-place pile[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(sup.1):82-85.
[12] 高笑娟,刘丰军,李跃辉,等. 挤扩支盘桩水平承载力计算和影响因素分析[J]. 工程力学, 2009, 26(7):97-104. GAO Xiaojuan, LIU Fengjun, LI Yuehui, et al. Calculation and influence factor analysis on lateral bearing capacity of squeezed branch and plate pile[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26(7):97-104.
[13] 孔令刚,姜丽红,陈仁朋,等. 倾斜上拔荷载下挤扩支盘桩响应分析[J]. 应用力学学报, 2013, 30(2):228-233. KONG Linggang, JIANG Lihong, CHEN Renpeng, et al. Response of squeezed branch piles under inclined uplift loads[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2013, 30(2):228-233.
[14] 蒋建平,高广运,顾宝和. 扩径桩承载性状及其Q-s曲线的幂双组合数学模型描述[J]. 工程力学, 2010, 27(11):120-126. JIANG Jianping, GAO Guangyun, GU Baohe. Bearing behaviors and description of Q-s curves of piles with expanded diameter based on power-hyperbola combined model[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2010, 27(11):120-126.
[15] 巨玉文,梁仁旺,白晓红,等. 挤扩支盘桩中支盘破坏形态的试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(5):188-194. JU Yuwen, LIANG Renwang, BAI Xiaohong, et al. Experimental study on the failure pattern of expanded plates of the squeezed branch pile[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(5):188-194.
[16] 贾超,张国荣. 基于强度折减法随机裂隙岩体结构稳定性分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(6):57-64. JIA Chao, ZHANG Guorong. Stability analysis of random fractured rock mass structure based on the strength reduction method[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2013, 43(6):57-64.
[17] 吕国仁,隋斌,王永进,等. 浅埋偏压隧道开挖数值模拟及稳定性研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(4):68-73. LYU Guoren, SUI Bin, WANG Yongjin, et al. Study on numerical simulation and stability analysis shallow buried tunnel excavation under unsymmetrical pressure[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2013, 43(4):68-73.
[18] 孙克国,仇文革,王中平,等. 高速公路改扩建工程对高铁隧道的近接施工影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(5):70-76. SUN Keguo, QIU Wenge, WANG Zhongping, et al. Study on approaching excavation influence between expanding projects of expressway and high speed railway tunnel under operation state[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2015, 45(5):70-76.
[19] 李枫,宋焕豹,周云东. 挤扩支盘桩的承载特性[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 38(2):202-205. LI Feng, SONG Huanbao, ZHOU Yundong. Bearing behaviors of squeezed branch piles[J].Journal of Hohai University(Natural Science), 2010, 38(2):202-205.
[20] 王者超,李术才,薛翊国,等. 大型地下水封石油洞库围岩完整性、变形和稳定性分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2011, 41(3):112-117. WANG Zhechao, LI Shucai, XUE Yiguo, et al. Integrity, deformation and stability of a rock mass around underground crude oil storage caverns in containment of groundwater[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2011, 41(3):112-117.
[21] GU Ming, KONG Linggang, CHEN Renpeng, et al. Response of 1×2 pile group under eccentric lateral loading[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2014, 57:114-121.
[22] 贾堤,石峰,郑刚,等. 深基坑工程数值模拟土体弹性模量取值的探讨[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(增刊):155-158 JIA Di, SHI Feng, ZHENG Gang, et al. Elastic modules of soil used in numerical simulation of deep foundations pits[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(Supp.):155-158.
[23] 郑刚,王丽. 竖向荷载作用下倾斜桩的荷载传递性状及承载力研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(3):323-330. ZHENG Gang, WANG Li. Load transfer and bearing capacity of inclined pile under vertical load[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(3):323-330.
[24] 费康,张建伟. ABAQUS在岩土工程中的应用[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社,2010.
[25] 费康,刘汉龙,高玉峰,等. 现浇混凝土薄壁管桩的荷载传递机理[J]. 岩土力学, 2004, 25(5):764-768. FEI Kang, LIU Hanlong, GAO Yufeng, et al. Load transfer mechanism for field pour concrete thin wall cased pile(PCC)[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2004, 25(5):764-768.
[1] 庄培芝,张营超,宋修广,杨鹤,郭志成,胡岩. 考虑尺寸效应的桩侧摩阻力修正计算方法[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2021, 51(5): 8-15.
[2] 李连祥,邢宏侠,李金良,黄亨利,王雷. 喷扩锥台压灌桩最优构造[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2020, 50(6): 82-91.
[3] 李连祥,刘兵,成晓阳. 基坑支护桩永久存在对地下室外墙土压力分布的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 30-38.
[4] 米春荣,李建明. 预应力混凝土管桩后注浆器的研制与应用[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(4): 89-95.
[5] 张娜1,2,崔新壮1,2*,张炯1,2,周亚旭1,2,高智珺1,2,隋伟1,2. 路堤荷载作用下透水性混凝土桩减压降沉效应研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(4): 80-86.
[6] 崔新壮,金青 . 轮载作用下饱水沥青路面的动力响应[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(5): 19-24 .
[7] 高智珺, 崔新壮, 隋伟, 郭洪, 刘航, 李长义, 冯洪波. 大型失控车辆与隧道衬砌的动态相互作用与损伤分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(5): 49-57.
[8] 韩超,王彤,陈德文,孙恩赐,李平,吴则祥,周冲,庄培芝. 基于耦合欧拉-拉格朗日方法的砂土中静压桩挤土效应数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(2): 143-152.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张永花,王安玲,刘福平 . 低频非均匀电磁波在导电界面的反射相角[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 22 -25 .
[2] 孔祥臻,刘延俊,王勇,赵秀华 . 气动比例阀的死区补偿与仿真[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(1): 99 -102 .
[3] 来翔 . 用胞映射方法讨论一类MKdV方程[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(1): 87 -92 .
[4] 余嘉元1 , 田金亭1 , 朱强忠2 . 计算智能在心理学中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 1 -5 .
[5] 季涛,高旭,孙同景,薛永端,徐丙垠 . 铁路10 kV自闭/贯通线路故障行波特征分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 111 -116 .
[6] 秦通,孙丰荣*,王丽梅,王庆浩,李新彩. 基于极大圆盘引导的形状插值实现三维表面重建[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(3): 1 -5 .
[7] 孙殿柱,朱昌志,李延瑞 . 散乱点云边界特征快速提取算法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 84 -86 .
[8] 胡天亮,李鹏,张承瑞,左毅 . 基于VHDL的正交编码脉冲电路解码计数器设计[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(3): 10 -13 .
[9] 卜德云 张道强. 自适应谱聚类算法研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(5): 22 -26 .
[10] 王杉,李田泽 . 一种绕线转子感应电机控制的新方法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(3): 86 -89 .
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(工学版)》编辑部　
地址: 济南市山大南路27号（250100）　 电话: 0531-88366735　 E-mail: xbgxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发