您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(工学版)》

山东大学学报 (工学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (5): 40-51.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2024.210

• 机器学习与数据挖掘 • 上一篇    

基于ETC收费数据的特大城市高速公路通勤流识别方法研究

代洪娜1,李忠锐2*,冯海霞2,赵欢欢2,范宏贤2   

  1. 1.山东交通学院顿河学院, 山东 济南 250357;2.山东交通学院交通与物流工程学院, 山东 济南 250357
  • 发布日期:2026-10-19
  • 作者简介:代洪娜(1987— ),女,山东济南人,副教授,硕士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为交通规划、智能交通. E-mail:203060@sdjtu.edu.cn. *通信作者简介:李忠锐(1999— ),男,山东泰安人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为道路交通运输、交通大数据. E-mail:1911662999@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省交通运输厅科技计划资助项目(2024B45)

The study of commuter flow identification methods on expressways in megacities based on ETC toll data

Dai Hongna1, Li Zhongrui2*, Feng Haixia2, Zhao Huanhuan2, Fan Hongxian2   

  1. Dai Hongna1, Li Zhongrui2*, Feng Haixia2, Zhao Huanhuan2, Fan Hongxian2(1. Don College, Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250357, Shandong, China;
    2. School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250357, Shandong, China
  • Published:2026-10-19

摘要: 为科学分析特大城市高速公路通勤流特征,从“客流特征-用地结构”双维度出发,利用高速公路ETC收费数据及收费站周边5 km用地数据开展分析:用区位熵和模糊C-均值法划分收费站点类型;结合车辆工作日通行特点,用改进Canopy-K-means算法识别通勤流;以济南市高速公路通勤流为例进行验证并分析其时空分布特征。结果表明:收费站点分就业主导型、错位偏就业型等6类;通勤流分早晚高峰时段均选择高速公路通行的常规型和仅早高峰时段选择高速公路通勤的特殊型2类;通勤流以“县城-中心城区”车流为主。此研究为高速公路道路规划、差异化收费等提供数据与理论支撑。

关键词: 道路交通, ETC数据, 特征聚类, 通勤识别, 站点类型

Abstract: To scientifically analyze the characteristics of highway commuting flows in megacities, a dual-dimensional approach focusing on “passenger flow characteristics-land use structure”was adopted in this study. Highway ETC toll data and land use data within a 5 km radius of toll stations were utilized for analysis. The station types were classified using location entropy and the fuzzy C-means algorithm. Based on vehicles' weekday travel patterns, an improved Canopy-K-means algorithm was applied to identify commuting flows. The highway commuting flows in Jinan were used as a case study for validation and analysis of their spatiotemporal distribution characteristics. The results showed that toll stations could be categorized into six types, including employment-dominated and employment-biased mismatch types. Commuting flows were divided into two categories: conventional commuters who used highways during both morning and evening peak hours, and special commuters who only used highways during the morning peak hour. The commuting flows were primarily composed of traffic from counties to the central urban area. This research provided data and theoretical support for highway planning and differentiated toll policies.

Key words: road traffic, ETC data, feature clustering, commuting identification, station type

中图分类号: 

  • TP311.13
[1] Yao W B, Zhang M L, Jin S, et al. Understanding vehicles commuting pattern based on license plate recognition data[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2021, 128: 103142.
[2] 陈艳艳, 王子帆, 孙浩冬, 等. 公共交通乘客的活动模式和规律性研究[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 51(8): 40-50. Chen Yanyan, Wang Zifan, Sun Haodong, et al. Study on the activity patterns and regularity of public transport passengers[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 51(8): 40-50.
[3] 彭飞, 宋国华, 朱珊. 城市公共交通常乘客通勤出行提取方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(2): 158-165. Peng Fei, Song Guohua, Zhu Shan. A method for extracting commuting trips of frequent passengers in urban public transportation[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(2): 158-165.
[4] Ma X L, Liu C C, Wen H M, et al. Understanding commuting patterns using transit smart card data[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2017, 58: 135-145.
[5] Manley E, Zhong C, Batty M. Spatiotemporal variation in travel regularity through transit user profiling[J]. Transportation, 2018, 45(3): 703-732.
[6] 畅玉皎, 杨东援. 基于车牌照数据的通勤特征车辆识别研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(2): 77-82. Chang Yujiao, Yang Dongyuan. Recognition of vehicles with commuting property using license plate data[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2016, 16(2): 77-82.
[7] 王冠, 陈华, 李建忠, 等. 基于IC卡数据的武汉市轨道交通客流时空特征[J]. 城市交通, 2018, 16(4): 81-88. Wang Guan, Chen Hua, Li Jianzhong, et al. Spatial-temporal characteristics of urban rail transit passenger flow in Wuhan based on IC card data[J]. Urban Transport of China, 2018, 16(4): 81-88.
[8] 李明珠, 赵习枝, 陈才, 等. 基于聚类的地铁通勤行为时空规律挖掘方法[J]. 集成技术, 2023, 12(1): 79-90. Li Mingzhu, Zhao Xizhi, Chen Cai, et al. Spatial and temporal law mining method of subway commuting behavior based on clustering[J]. Journal of Integration Technology, 2023, 12(1): 79-90.
[9] 杨静, 吴可, 张红亮, 等. 基于土地利用及客流特征的地铁车站分类[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 228-234. Yang Jing, Wu Ke, Zhang Hongliang, et al. Classification of subway stations based on land use and passenger flow characteristics[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(5): 228-234.
[10] 崔叙, 喻冰洁, 梁朋朋, 等. 基于“客流-用地”的城市轨道交通站点类型识别与空间再平衡研究: 以成都市为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2021(7): 68-79. Cui Xu, Yu Bingjie, Liang Pengpeng, et al. Urban rail transit station type identification and job-housing spatial rebalancing based on passenger flow and land use: taking Chengdu as an example[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2021(7): 68-79.
[11] 庞磊, 任利剑, 张哲浩, 等. 基于乘降客流特征的轨道交通站点分类及客流量影响因素分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(4): 184-193. Pang Lei, Ren Lijian, Zhang Zhehao, et al. Metro station classification based on boarding and alighting passenger flows and ridership impact factors[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2023, 23(4): 184-193.
[12] 马壮林, 杨兴, 谭晓伟, 等. 基于客流时间序列的城市轨道交通车站分类[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 41(6): 113-126. Ma Zhuanglin, Yang Xing, Tan Xiaowei, et al. Classification of urban rail transit stations based on passenger flow time series[J]. Journal of Chang'an University(Natural Science Edition), 2021, 41(6): 113-126.
[13] 尹芹, 孟斌, 张丽英. 基于客流特征的北京地铁站点类型识别[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(1): 126-134. Yin Qin, Meng Bin, Zhang Liying. Classification of subway stations in Beijing based on passenger flow characteristics[J]. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(1): 126-134.
[14] 付鑫, 孙茂棚, 孙皓. 基于GPS数据的出租车通勤识别及时空特征分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30(7): 134-143. Fu Xin, Sun Maopeng, Sun Hao. Taxi commute recognition and temporal-spatial characteristics analysis based on GPS data[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(7): 134-143.
[15] 谭晓伟, 杨兴, 马壮林, 等. 不同类型的城市轨道交通车站客流时空分布特征[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 44(1): 129-140. Tan Xiaowei, Yang Xing, Ma Zhuanglin, et al. Spatial-temporal distribution characteristics of passenger flow in different types of urban rail transit stations[J]. Journal of Chang'an University(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 44(1): 129-140.
[16] 靳海涛, 金凤君, 陈卓, 等. 基于换乘链断裂点时空信息的公交换乘行为识别[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2018, 18(5): 176-184. Jin Haitao, Jin Fengjun, Chen Zhuo, et al. Commute activity identification based on spatial and temporal information of transit chaining breaks[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(5): 176-184.
[17] 李树彬, 党文修, 傅白白. 基于收费数据的高速公路实时网络状态估计研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2015, 15(4): 63-69. Li Shubin, Dang Wenxiu, Fu Baibai. Traffic real-time network states estimation of expressway based on toll data[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2015, 15(4): 63-69.
[18] 杨超, 张玉梁, 张帆. 基于手机话单数据的通勤出行特征分析: 以深圳市为例[J]. 城市交通, 2016, 14(1): 30-36. Yang Chao, Zhang Yuliang, Zhang Fan. Commuting characteristics analysis based on mobile phone calling records: a case study in Shenzhen[J]. Urban Transport of China, 2016, 14(1): 30-36.
[19] Yang X P, Fang Z X, Yin L, et al. Understanding the spatial structure of urban commuting using mobile phone location data: a case study of Shenzhen, China[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(5): 1435.
[20] 魏广奇, 苏跃江, 吴德馨, 等. 基于高速公路流水数据的通勤车辆特征研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(3): 237-244. Wei Guangqi, Su Yuejiang, Wu Dexin, et al. Trip characteristics of vehicle with commuting property based on highway ticket data[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2019, 19(3): 237-244.
[21] 张慧馨, 张丽君, 秦耀辰, 等. 基于POI大数据的开封市城市功能扩张与演替特征分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2023, 25(3): 560-572. Zhang Huixin, Zhang Lijun, Qin Yaochen, et al. Spatial expansion and succession characteristics of urban function in Kaifeng City based on POI big data[J]. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2023, 25(3): 560-572.
[22] Suganthi R, Prabha K. Fuzzy similarity based hierarchical clustering for communities in twitter social networks[J]. Measurement: Sensors, 2024, 32: 101033.
[23] 王林, 贾钧琛. 基于改进Canopy-K-means算法的并行化研究[J]. 计算机测量与控制, 2021, 29(2): 176-179. Wang Lin, Jia Junchen. Research on parallelization based on improved canopy-K-means algorithm[J]. Computer Measurement & Control, 2021, 29(2): 176-179.
[24] Arthur D, Vassilvitskii S. K-means ++: the advantages of careful seeding[C] // Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. Orleans, USA: ACM, 2007: 1027-1035.
[1] 王宇佳,王新锋,张博,赵立健,刘一平,司书春,薛丽坤. 济南市区典型道路交通状况及其对空气质量的差异化影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2025, 55(1): 138-148.
[2] 宋修广, 赵涛, 毕研美, 张紫豪, 杜聪, 田源, 孔晓光. 光纤传感技术在道路交通中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(2): 13-26.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!