您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(工学版)》

山东大学学报 (工学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6): 131-138.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2022.130

• 机器学习与数据挖掘 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于双通路卷积融合网络的脑龄分布预测

沈鑫杰,黄嘉爽,丁卫平*,孙颖,王海鹏,鞠恒荣   

  1. 南通大学信息科学技术学院, 江苏 南通226019
  • 发布日期:2022-12-23
  • 作者简介:沈鑫杰(1996— ),男,江苏常州人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为数据挖掘和深度学习. E-mail:sxjalg1114@163.com. *通信作者简介:丁卫平(1979— ),男,江苏常州人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为数据挖掘、机器学习、粒计算、演化计算和大数据分析等. E-mail: dwp9988@163.com.
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(61976120,62006128,62102199);江苏省自然科学基金(BK20191445);江苏省高等学校自然科学研究重大项目(21KJA510004);南通市科技局基础科学研究项目(JC2020141,JC2021122)

Brain age distribution prediction with dual-pathway convolutional fusion neural networks

SHEN Xinjie, HUANG Jiashuang, DING Weiping*, SUN Ying, WANG Haipeng, JU Hengrong   

  1. School of Information Science and Technology, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, Jiangsu, China
  • Published:2022-12-23

摘要: 采用深度学习对脑龄预测问题进行研究,提出并设计一种基于双通路卷积融合网络的脑龄分布预测模型,以有效预测被试的大脑年龄。将被试静息态功能磁共振成像(rest-state functional MRI, rs-fMRI)数据通过标记分布学习方法,将确定的脑龄标签转化为一组具有高斯分布的概率,设计一个双通路卷积融合网络,包含卷积、批量归一化、池化等步骤,可以同时学习rs-fMRI多类激活图的特征,通过一个低秩融合网络来融合这些特征,利用损失函数对网络更新优化;对预测模型的结果进行详细分析。该模型得到的绝对平均误差和相关系数的指标分别为5.735和0.592 4。试验结果表明,相较于其他模型,该模型取得的平均绝对误差更小,相关系数更高,显著提高了基于rs-fMRI图像的脑龄预测精度。

关键词: 静息态功能磁共振成像, 激活图, 双通路卷积融合网络, 脑龄分布预测, 低秩融合

中图分类号: 

  • U495
[1] THOMPSON P M, HAYASHI K M, DE Z G, et al. Dynamics of gray matter loss in Alzheimer′s disease[J]. Journal of Neuroscience, 2003, 23(3): 9941005.
[2] SHENG J, XIN Y, ZHANG Q, et al. Predictive classification of Alzheimer′s disease using brain imaging and genetic data[J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 19.
[3] COLE J H, LEECH R, SHARP D J, et al. Prediction of brain age suggests accelerated atrophy after traumatic brain injury[J]. Annals of Neurology, 2015, 77(4): 571581.
[4] 黄嘉爽,接标,丁卫平,等.脑网络分析方法及其应用[J].数据采集与处理, 2021, 36(4):648663.
HUANG Jiashuang, JIE Biao, DING Weiping, et al. Brain network analysis methods and their applications[J]. Data Acquisition and Processing, 2021, 36(4):648663.
[5] WANG Q, HU K, WANG M, et al. Predicting brain age during typical and atypical development based on structural and functional neuroimaging[J]. Human Brain Mapping, 2021, 42(18): 59435955.
[6] GOLD A L, ABEND R, BRITTON J C, et al. Age differences in the neural correlates of anxiety disorders: an fMRI study of response to learned threat[J]. American Journal of Psychiatry, 2020, 177(5): 454463.
[7] HUANG J, ZHOU L, WANG L, et al. Attentiondiffusionbilinear neural network for brain network analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2020, 39(7): 25412552.
[8] KONG X, XU S, SUN Y, et al. Electroconvulsive therapy changes the regional resting state function measured by regional homogeneity (ReHo) and amplitude of low frequency fluctuations (ALFF) in elderly major depressive disorder patients: an exploratory study[J]. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 2017, 264: 1321.
[9] LIEM F, VAROQUAUX G, KYNAST J, et al. Predicting brainage from multimodal imaging data captures cognitive impairment[J]. Neuroimage, 2017, 148: 179188.
[10] FRANKE K, LUDERS E, MAY A, et al. Brain maturation: predicting individual BrainAGE in children and adolescents using structural MRI[J]. Neuroimage, 2012, 63(3): 13051312.
[11] COLE J H. Multimodality neuroimaging brainage in UK biobank: relationship to biomedical, lifestyle, and cognitive factors[J]. Neurobiology of Aging, 2020, 92: 3442.
[12] WANG Q, HU K, WANG M, et al. Predicting brain age during typical and atypical development based on structural and functional neuroimaging[J]. Human Brain Mapping, 2021, 42(18): 59435955.
[13] 莫鸿飞,谢振平. 基于双通道深度CNN的烟雾浓度测量方法[J]. 模式识别与人工智能, 2021, 34(9):844852.
MO Hongfei, XIE Zhenping. A twochannel deep CNNbased method for measuring smoke concentration[J]. Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 34(9):844852.
[14] 张昱,高凯龙,李继涛,等. 双通道多核卷积神经网络中文文本情绪分类方法[J]. 内蒙古大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 52(5):508513.
ZHANG Yu, GAO Kailong, LI Jitao, et al. A twochannel multicore convolutional neural network approach to Chinese text emotion classification[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 52(5):508513.
[15] PANIS G, LANITIS A, TSAPATSOULIS N, et al. Overview of research on facial ageing using the FGNET ageing database[J]. Let Biometrics, 2016, 5(2): 3746.
[16] LURIE D J, KESSLER D, BASSETT D S, et al. Questions and controversies in the study of timevarying functional connectivity in resting fMRI[J]. Network Neuroscience, 2020, 4(1): 3069.
[17] GENG X. Label distribution learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2016, 28(7): 17341748.
[18] GAO B B, XING C, XIE C W, et al. Deep label distribution learning with label ambiguity[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2017, 26(6): 28252838.
[19] LI H, He X, YU Z, et al. Noiserobust image fusion with lowrank sparse decomposition guided by external patch prior[J]. Information Sciences, 2020, 523: 1437.
[20] DE LANGE A M G, COLE J H. Commentary: correction procedures in brainage prediction[J]. Neuroimage: Clinical, 2020, 26:102229.
[21] MOORE P J, LYONS T J, GALLACHER J, et al. Random forest prediction of Alzheimer′s disease using pairwise selection from time series data[J]. Plos One, 2019, 14(2): e0211558.
[22] AYCHEH H M, SEONG J K, SHIN J H, et al. Biological brain age prediction using cortical thickness data: a large scale cohort study[J]. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2018, 10: 252.
[23] LIAO L, ZHANG X, ZHAO F, et al. Multibranch deformable convolutional neural network with label distribution learning for fetal brain age prediction[C]//2020 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). Iowa City, United States: IEEE, 2020: 424427.
[24] PENG H, GONG W, BECKMANN C F, et al. Accurate brain age prediction with lightweight deep neural networks[J]. Medical Image Analysis, 2021, 68: 101871.
[25] HE S, PEREIRA D, PEREZ J D, et al. Multichannel attentionfusion neural network for brain age estimation:accuracy, generality, and interpretation with 16705 healthy MRIs across lifespan[J]. Medical Image Analysis, 2021, 72: 102091.
[1] 宋修广, 赵涛, 毕研美, 张紫豪, 杜聪, 田源, 孔晓光. 光纤传感技术在道路交通中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(2): 13-26.
[2] 于少伟,秦瑞伶,关京京,吉灿,封硕,姜锐,刘英宁. 利用通行能力余量的智能网联车队生态驾驶模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(6): 23-29.
[3] 闵海根,方煜坤,吴霞,王武祺. 网联交通环境下的车-车通信故障诊断方法[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2021, 51(6): 84-92.
[4] 李崴,王者超,李术才,丁万涛,王琦,宗智,刘克奇. 哈尔滨地铁粉质黏土力学性质与超前支护方式[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 61-71.
[5] 何永明,权聪,魏堃,冯佳,万亚楠,陈世升. 超高速公路虚拟轨道系统车辆坐标转换模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(4): 56-64.
[6] 江健宏,舒晓锐,刘志鲲,孙杰,荆树举,张宏博. 废旧轮胎碎片(TDA)复合填料中竖向锚定板承载特性[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(6): 92-99.
[7] 赵涛,张宁,王小超,马川义,田源,张圣涛,杨梓梁. 基于图神经网络轨迹预测的合流区交通冲突预测方法[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(2): 36-46.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王素玉,艾兴,赵军,李作丽,刘增文 . 高速立铣3Cr2Mo模具钢切削力建模及预测[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(1): 1 -5 .
[2] 李 侃 . 嵌入式相贯线焊接控制系统开发与实现[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(4): 37 -41 .
[3] 孔祥臻,刘延俊,王勇,赵秀华 . 气动比例阀的死区补偿与仿真[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(1): 99 -102 .
[4] 陈瑞,李红伟,田靖. 磁极数对径向磁轴承承载力的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 81 -85 .
[5] 李可,刘常春,李同磊 . 一种改进的最大互信息医学图像配准算法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 107 -110 .
[6] 季涛,高旭,孙同景,薛永端,徐丙垠 . 铁路10 kV自闭/贯通线路故障行波特征分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(2): 111 -116 .
[7] 浦剑1 ,张军平1 ,黄华2 . 超分辨率算法研究综述[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 27 -32 .
[8] 张英,郎咏梅,赵玉晓,张鉴达,乔鹏,李善评 . 由EGSB厌氧颗粒污泥培养好氧颗粒污泥的工艺探讨[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(4): 56 -59 .
[9] 王丽君,黄奇成,王兆旭 . 敏感性问题中的均方误差与模型比较[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(6): 51 -56 .
[10] 孙殿柱,朱昌志,李延瑞 . 散乱点云边界特征快速提取算法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(1): 84 -86 .