您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(工学版)》

山东大学学报 (工学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (5): 173-181.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2025.153

• 机械与能动工程 • 上一篇    

燃气轮机润滑油管线两相流动及结构响应特性分析

张斌1,周广杰1,任冠宇2,辛公明2,刘波2*   

  1. 1.山东电力工程咨询院有限公司, 山东 济南 250013;2.山东大学核科学与能源动力学院, 山东 济南 250061
  • 发布日期:2026-10-19
  • 作者简介:张斌(1970— ),男,山东淄博人,教授级高级工程师,主要研究方向为先进能源动力系统工艺优化. E-mail:abin_70@126.com. *通信作者简介:刘波(1988— ),男,四川泸州人,助理研究员,硕士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为先进动力系统可靠性评估. E-mail:liu_bo@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家电力投资集团C类课题资助项目(37-K2024-292)

Analysis of two-phase flow and structural response characteristics in gas turbine lubricating oil pipes

Zhang Bin1, Zhou Guangjie1, Ren Guanyu2, Xin Gongming2, Liu Bo2*   

  1. Zhang Bin1, Zhou Guangjie1, Ren Guanyu2, Xin Gongming2, Liu Bo2*(1. Shandong Electric Power Engineering Consulting Institute Co., Ltd., Jinan 250013, Shandong, China;
    2. School of Nuclear Science, Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, Shandong, China
  • Published:2026-10-19

摘要: 为避免首台300 MW级F级重型燃气轮机润滑油回油过程中发生气塞,防止管道内不稳定流动导致管线变形,对回油管线的两相流动及结构响应特性进行深入研究。基于剪切应力传输(shear stress transport, SST)k-ω湍流模型和流体体积(volume of fluid, VOF)模型,建立完整回油管线的气液两相流模型,分析不同回油温度及液相率下的管内流动模式、两相流流态及气液分布情况;基于流场仿真数据,建立回油管线流固耦合动力学模型,研究不同流动情况下的管线结构响应特性。结果表明,在回油过程中,管内润滑油的流动形态主要呈现分层流与周向绕流两种流型。在周向绕流作用管段,最大液相率出现在管段终点截面,绕流管段中心区域截面的液相率与回油口液相率均呈正相关。随着润滑油温度升高,管路整体平均液相率降低。当回油口液相率低于0.50时,系统平均液相率与回油口液相率呈正相关关系。经结构力学验证,管道系统及支吊架的结构设计符合应力规范要求。本研究为重型燃气轮机润滑油回油管道的优化设计与安全评估提供理论依据,有效提高燃气轮机运行的可靠性与稳定性。

关键词: 润滑油, 两相流, 流固耦合, 结构响应, 燃气轮机

Abstract: To prevent gas locking and the consequent blockage of the lubricating-oil return pipeline in the first 300 MW-class F-class heavy-duty gas turbine, as well as pipeline deformation induced by unstable internal flow, the two-phase flow and structural response characteristics of the oil return pipeline were systematically investigated. A numerical model of gas-liquid two-phase flow covering the entire oil return pipeline was developed using the shear stress transport(SST)k-ω turbulence model and the volume of fluid(VOF)method. The flow patterns, two-phase flow regimes, and gas-liquid distributions in the pipeline were analyzed under different lubricating-oil temperatures and liquid volume fractions at the oil return inlet. Based on the simulated flow-field data, a fluid-structure interaction dynamic model of the oil return pipeline was subsequently established to investigate the structural response characteristics of the pipeline and its supports under different flow conditions. The numerical results indicated that the lubricating oil in the return pipeline primarily exhibited two characteristic flow patterns, including stratified flow and circumferential swirling flow. In the pipeline section characterized by circumferential swirling flow, the maximum liquid volume fraction occurred at the downstream end cross-section. The liquid volume fraction in the central cross-section of this section was positively correlated with the liquid volume fraction at the oil return inlet. As the lubricating oil temperature increased, the overall mean liquid volume fraction in the pipeline generally decreased. When the inlet liquid volume fraction was below 0.50, the system-averaged liquid volume fraction increased with increasing inlet liquid volume fraction. Structural mechanical analysis further demonstrated that the stress levels in both the pipeline system and its supports satisfied the requirements of the relevant design codes. The findings provided a theoretical basis for the optimal design and safety assessment of lubricating oil return systems in heavy-duty gas turbines and contributed to improving the operational reliability and stability of gas turbine units.

Key words: lubricating oil, two phase flow, fluid-structure interaction, structural response, gas turbines

中图分类号: 

  • TK124
[1] Tahan M, Tsoutsanis E, Muhammad M, et al. Performance-based health monitoring, diagnostics and prognostics for condition-based maintenance of gas turbines: a review[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 198: 122-144.
[2] 刘建生. 汽轮机、燃气轮机润滑油系统异常分析与处理[J]. 浙江电力, 2016, 35(7): 49-52. Liu Jiansheng. Analysis and treatment on abnormality of lubricating oil system of steam turbine and gas turbine[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2016, 35(7): 49-52.
[3] 衣爽. 燃气轮机滑油和燃料系统故障诊断与预测研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2012: 8-24. Yi Shuang. Research on fault diagnosis and prediction of gas turbine lube oil and fuel system[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2012: 8-24.
[4] 李飞. MS5002C燃气轮机结构及运行维护研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2012: 24-35. Li Fei. Research on MS5002C gas turbine structure and maintenance[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Techno-logy, 2012: 24-35.
[5] Su H, Qu Y G, Peng Z K. Investigation on gas-liquid two-phase flow-induced vibrations of a horizontal elastic pipe[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2023, 145(6): 061402.
[6] Siba M, Wanmahmood W, Nuaw M Z, et al. Flow-induced vibration in pipes: challenges and solutions: a review[J]. Journal of Engineering Science and Tech-nology, 2016, 11(3): 362-382.
[7] Taitel Y, Dukler A E. A model for predicting flow regime transitions in horizontal and near horizontal gas-liquid flow[J]. AIChE Journal, 1976, 22(1): 47-55.
[8] Beggs D H, Brill J P. A study of two-phase flow in inclined pipes[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1973, 25(5): 607-617.
[9] 张赫铭, 李文昊, 何新林, 等. 不同管径水平管道气液两相流动数值模拟[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2021, 39(5): 488-494. Zhang Heming, Li Wenhao, He Xinlin, et al. Numerical simulation of gas-liquid two-phase flow in horizontal pipeline with different diameters[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2021, 39(5): 488-494.
[10] Fukagata K, Kasagi N, Ua-arayaporn P, et al. Numerical simulation of gas-liquid two-phase flow and convective heat transfer in a micro tube[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2007, 28(1): 72-82.
[11] Bamidele O E, Hassan M, Ahmed W H. Flow induced vibration of two-phase flow passing through orifices under slug pattern conditions[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2021, 101: 103209.
[12] Zhao N N, Feng J J, Guo P C, et al. Investigation on vibration characteristics induced by gas-liquid two-phase flows in a horizontal pipe[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36(7): 073336.
[13] 王麒均. 管内两相流作用下的U形管流致振动研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2023. Wang Qijun. Study on flow-induced vibration of U-tube under two-phase flow[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023.
[14] 唐有波. 海洋立管内部气液段塞流动特性及其流致振动研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2017. Tang Youbo. Study on gas-liquid slug flow characteristics and flow-induced vibration of marine riser[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2017.
[15] Liu B, Zhao J G, Qian J H. Numerical analysis of cavitation erosion and particle erosion in butterfly valve[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2017, 80: 312-324.
[16] Liu B, Chen C Z, Ran B, et al. Numerical investigation of flow patterns and mixing characteristics in a 3D micromixer with helical elements over wide Reynolds numbers[J]. Advanced Theory and Simulations, 2023, 6(5): 2200671.
[17] Versteeg H K, Malalasekra W. An introduction to computational fluid dynamics[M]. London, UK: Pearson, 2007: 60-113.
[18] 刘波. 船用齿轮箱动态激励模拟及动力学性能优化[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2015: 21-23. Liu Bo. Dynamic excitation simulation and dynamic performance optimization of marine gearbox[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2015: 21-23.
[19] Yin Z C, Ni Y S, Li L, et al. Numerical modeling and experimental investigation of a two-phase sink vortex and its fluid-solid vibration characteristics[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science A, 2024, 25(1): 47-62.
[20] 中国电力工程顾问集团华东电力设计院. 发电厂汽水管道支吊架设计手册: D-ZD2010[M]. 上海: 上海中西书局, 2010: 1-259.
[1] 蒋勇军,陈鑫,兰庆男,张志强. 富水软岩隧道突水突泥灾害防控措施水压分布特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2026, 56(4): 135-144.
[2] 刘祥坤,李树忱,王修伟,田野,许京伟,魏清武,赵永曦. 基于CFD的铣槽机泥浆运移规律数值模拟及施工优化[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 53(3): 69-77.
[3] 戚翔,冯翔健,熊骋望,孙子正,张一鸣. 低雷诺数下近自由液面圆柱流致振动数值模拟与机理[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2022, 52(3): 51-60.
[4] 张翠勋, 曹明见, 杨锋苓. 双层格栅桨搅拌容器内气液两相混合[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2021, 51(4): 71-76.
[5] 王丹华,张冠敏,冷学礼,徐梦娜,韩圆圆. T型管内两相流分配特性数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(1): 89-95.
[6] 冀翠莲, 韩吉田, 尹静, 陈常念, 任立波, 孔令健. 螺旋管内流动沸腾传热系数关联式拟合与误差分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(5): 83-87.
[7] 袁晓豆,史月涛*. 气固两相流绕流H型翅片管流动及积灰特性的数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2012, 42(2): 112-117.
[8] 姚延立,马国利. 洋葱状富勒烯的硬脂酸修饰[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(3): 91-94.
[9] 徐昊,魏守水*,张敬涛. 一种新型微流体主动混合器的仿真与分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(3): 57-60.
[10] 王建明 宫文军 高娜. 基于ALE法的磨料水射流加工数值模拟[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(1): 48-52.
[11] 李新平 代翼飞 胡静. 某岩溶隧道围岩稳定性及涌水量预测的流固耦合分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(4): 1-6.
[12] 尚翠霞 王勇 谢玉东. 流体控制阀的流固耦合特性[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(6): 11-14.
[13] 赵元宾,孙奉仲,王凯,高明 . 自然通风湿式冷却塔传热传质的三维数值分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(5): 36-41 .
[14] 郑继周,程林,杜文静 . 充液弹性管束流固耦合系统模态分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2007, 37(4): 55-59 .
[15] 牛新生,叶华,王亮 . 充液弹性管束流固耦合系统模态分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2007, 37(4): 0-0 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!