您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(工学版)》

山东大学学报 (工学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (4): 125-134.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2025.026

• 土木工程 • 上一篇    

锈蚀情况下隧道衬砌承载性能变化

刘健,李霄汉,邓道军,寇磊,张瀚鸣*,解全一   

  1. 山东大学齐鲁交通学院, 山东 济南 250061
  • 发布日期:2026-08-12
  • 作者简介:刘健(1975— ),男,山东梁山人,教授,博士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为隧道智能检测与防灾减灾. E-mail:lj75@sdu.edu.cn. *通信作者简介:张瀚鸣(1993— ),男,山东济南人,助理研究员,博士,主要研究方向为交通基础设施材料劣化机理与结构性能评估. E-mail:hmzhang619@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    山东省泰山学者工程资助项目(tstp20221153);山东省自然科学基金资助项目(ZR2022DKX001)

The change of bearing performance of tunnel lining under corrosion condition

Liu Jian, Li Xiaohan, Deng Daojun, Kou Lei, Zhang Hanming*, Xie Quanyi   

  1. Liu Jian, Li Xiaohan, Deng Daojun, Kou Lei, Zhang Hanming*, Xie Quanyi(School of Qilu Transportation, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, Shandong, China
  • Published:2026-08-12

摘要: 针对钢筋锈蚀对混凝土衬砌承载性能的影响规律,通过拉拔试验研究锈蚀率对钢筋混凝土黏结性能的影响,并以此为基础利用数值仿真研究锈蚀钢筋与混凝土黏结-滑移仿真,同时利用隧道承载模型研究钢筋锈蚀作用下隧道承载衰减规律。结果表明,将C40混凝土和HRB400钢筋组合的钢筋临界锈蚀率范围从1%~3%进一步缩小到1%~2%;基于ABAQUS的等尺寸拉拔模型可准确预测锈蚀情况下的黏结-滑移行为,并通过隧道承载模型发现,当右侧拱脚位置发生锈蚀后,隧道衬砌左侧表面应力基本不变,右侧拱肩和右侧拱腰位置应力随锈蚀率增加先减后增,右拱脚位置表面应力先增后减;通过隧道承载模型发现,当右侧拱脚位置钢筋产生大于1%锈蚀后,隧道承载性能劣化,并预测当此处钢筋产生15%锈蚀后,隧道左右拱脚、右拱腰处安全系数低于规范要求的2.0,失去安全承载力。

关键词: 钢筋锈蚀, 黏结-滑移, 隧道衬砌, 结构分析, 数值仿真

Abstract: This study investigated the influence of steel reinforcement corrosion on the load-bearing performance of concrete linings. Pull-out tests were conducted to examine the effect of corrosion rate on the bond behavior between steel reinforcement and concrete. Based on the experimental results, numerical simulations were performed to model the bond-slip behavior between corroded steel bars and concrete. Concurrently, a tunnel load-bearing model was employed to analyze the degradation pattern of tunnel bearing capacity under reinforcement corrosion. The results indicated that the critical corrosion rate range for the combination of C40 concrete and HRB400 steel bars was further narrowed from 1%-3% to 1%-2%. An isometric pull-out model based on ABAQUS accurately predicted the bond-slip behavior under corrosion conditions. Furthermore, the tunnel load-bearing model revealed that when corrosion occurred at the right arch springing position, the surface stress on the left side of the tunnel lining remained essentially unchanged, whereas the stresses at the right arch shoulder and right arch haunch first decreased and then increased with increasing corrosion rate. The surface stress at the right arch springing initially increased and then decreased. The tunnel load-bearing model also demonstrated that reinforcement corrosion exceeding 1% at the right arch springing deteriorated the tunnel's bearing capacity. It was predicted that when the corrosion rate of the reinforcement at this location reached 15%, the safety factors at the left and right arch springings and the right arch haunch would fall below the required value of 2.0 as specified in the relevant code, indicating a loss of safe load-bearing capacity.

Key words: rebar corrosion, bond slip, tunnel lining, structural analysis, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • TU37
[1] 杨朝帅, 崔臻, 牛富生, 等. 隧道衬砌病害对结构安全性影响机理研究[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报, 2023, 21(4): 180-186. Yang Chaoshuai, Cui Zhen, Niu Fusheng, et al. Influence mechanism on structural safety by tunnel liner diseases[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, 2023, 21(4): 180-186.
[2] Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism of Japan. Statistical report on tunnel safety accidents[EB/OL].(2014-11-25)[2024-10-10]. https://www.mlit.go.jp/common/001061636.pdf
[3] JTG H12—2015 公路隧道养护技术规范[S].
[4] Alsulaimani G J, Kaleeullah M, Basunbul I A, et al. Influence of corrosion and cracking on bond behavior and strength of reinforced-concrete members[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1993, 87(2): 220-231.
[5] Fu X, Chung D. Effect of corrosion on the bond between concrete and steel rebar[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1997, 27(12): 1811-1815.
[6] 李福海, 靳贺松, 胡丁涵, 等. 锈蚀钢筋混凝土黏结滑移试验研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2018, 40(8): 154-159. Li Fuhai, Jin Hesong, Hu Dinghan, et al. Experimental study on bond-slip performance of corroded reinforced concrete[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2018, 40(8): 154-159.
[7] 张志强, 张康健, 刘新华, 等. 盾构隧道衬砌结构偏心破坏转化临界锈蚀率预测[J]. 土木工程学报, 2024, 57(1): 111-121. Zhang Zhiqiang, Zhang Kangjian, Liu Xinhua, et al. Prediction of critical corrosion rate for eccentric failure transformation of shield tunnel lining structures[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2024, 57(1): 111-121.
[8] Zhao C X, Ying Z Q, Du C B, et al. Influence of corrosion on the bond-slip behaviour between corroded bars and concrete[J]. Materials, 2023, 16(23): 7366.
[9] Zhou H J, Lu J L, Xi X, et al. Effects of stirrup corrosion on bond-slip performance of reinforcing steel in concrete: an experimental study[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 93: 257-266.
[10] Tondolo F. Bond behaviour with reinforcement corrosion[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 93: 926-932.
[11] 李星, 杨子江, 孙理想, 等. 长期腐蚀环境影响下GFRP-钢混合配筋混凝土构件的抗弯性能研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2017, 12(14): 2604-2611. Li Xing, Yang Zijiang, Sun Lixiang, et al. Research on the flexural behavior of concrete composites with hybrid reinforcement of GFRP bars and steel bars under long term corrosion environment [J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2017, 12(14): 2604-2611.
[12] 周旭明, 石钰锋, 张利敏, 等. 边墙与仰拱连接处缺陷对隧道结构影响试验[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(1): 74-80. Zhou Xuming, Shi Yufeng, Zhang Limin, et al. Experiment on influence of defects at the connection between side wall and inverted arch on tunnel structure[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(1): 74-80.
[13] 袁迎曙, 章鑫森, 姬永生. 人工气候与恒电流通电法加速锈蚀钢筋混凝土梁的结构性能比较研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2006, 39(3): 42-46. Yuan Yingshu, Zhang Xinsen, Ji Yongsheng. A comparative study on str uctur al behavior of deteriorated reinforced concrete beam under two different environments[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2006, 39(3): 42-46.
[14] 干伟忠, 金伟良, 高明赞. 混凝土中钢筋加速锈蚀试验适用性研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2001, 32(2): 41-47. Gan Weizhong, Jin Weiliang, Gao Mingzan. Applicability study on accelerated corrosion methods of steel bars in concrete structure[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2001, 32(2): 41-47.
[15] Mendes L, Castro L. A new RC bond model suitable for three-dimensional cyclic analyses[J]. Computers & Structures, 2013, 120: 47-64.
[16] 罗先明. 变形钢筋与混凝土粘结性能数值模拟与计算[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2021: 31-47. Luo Xianming. Numerical simulation and calculation of bond performance between deformed bar and concrete[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2021: 31-47.
[17] 袁迎曙, 贾福萍, 蔡跃. 锈蚀钢筋混凝土梁的结构性能退化模型[J]. 土木工程学报, 2001, 34(3): 47-52. Yuan Yingshu, Jia Fuping, Cai Yue. The structural behavior deterioration model for corroded reinforced concrete beams [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2001, 34(3): 47-52.
[18] Castel A, Francois R, Arliguie G. Mechanical behaviour of corroded reinforced concrete beams: part 2: bond and notch effects[J]. Materials and Structures, 2000, 33(233): 511-545.
[19] 裴超, 肖勇, 朱智勇, 等. 复杂应力环境中隧道大变形特征与形变控制[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(2): 89-98. Pei Chao, Xiao Yong, Zhu Zhiyong, et al. Large deformation characteristics and deformation control of tunnel in complex stress environment[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(2): 89-98.
[20] 王剑宏, 常洪雷, 刘健, 等. 水下盾构隧道耐久性与全生命周期设计[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(2): 1-13. Wang Jianhong, Chang Honglei, Liu Jian, et al. The durability of underwater shield tunnel and its life-cycle design[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2020, 2(2): 1-13.
[21] 李永珑, 刘新华, 朱星宇, 等. 钢筋锈蚀作用下隧道衬砌结构力学性能劣化研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2024, 46(1): 156-163. Li Yonglong, Liu Xinhua, Zhu Xingyu, et al. Research on deterioration of mechanical properties of tunnel lining structure under reinforcement corrosion[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2024, 46(1): 156-163.
[22] 魏纲, 徐天宝, 张治国. 复杂应力路径下波纹钢加固盾构隧道数值分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(2): 24-32. Wei Gang, Xu Tianbao, Zhang Zhiguo. Numerical analysis of corrugated steel reinforced shield tunnel under complex stress path[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(2): 24-32.
[23] 童建军, 邵国霞. 海底隧道钢拱架锈蚀对承载力影响研究[J]. 铁道建筑, 2011(6): 81-83.
[24] Zhang Z, Gong R, Zhang H, et al. The sustainability performance of reinforced concrete structures in tunnel lining induced by long-term coastal environment[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(10): 3946.
[25] 刘四进, 何川, 封坤, 等. 受荷状态下盾构隧道管片锈蚀劣化破坏过程研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2018, 51(6): 120-128. Liu Sijin, He Chuan, Feng Kun, et al. Research on corrosion deterioration and failure process of shield tunnel segments under loads[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2018, 51(6): 120-128.
[26] 许勇, 夏明, 张炜, 等. 钢筋锈蚀作用下盾构隧道结构损伤劣化性能[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2023, 23(27): 11841-11853. Xu Yong, Xia Ming, Zhang Wei, et al. Damage and deterioration of shield tunnel structure under reinforcement corrosion [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2023, 23(27): 11841-11853.
[27] 刘力英, 欧振锋, 杨春山, 等. 沉管基槽开挖诱发临岸结构变形数值模拟与实测分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 12-19. Liu Liying, Ou Zhenfeng, Yang Chunshan, et al. Numerical simulation and field measurement analysis of coastal structures under immersed tunnel trench excavation[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2024, 6(4): 12-19.
[28] GB/T 50081—2019 混凝土物理力学性能试验方法标准[S].
[29] GB/T 24196—2009 金属和合金的腐蚀 电化学试验方法 恒电位和动电位极化测量导则[S].
[30] Faraday M. Experimental researches in electricity[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1832, 122: 125-162.
[31] 兰官奇, 王毅红, 刘乐, 等. 考虑混凝土软化效应的钢筋与混凝土粘结强度计算模型[J]. 工程力学, 2022, 39(9): 234-241. Lan Guanqi, Wang Yihong, Liu Le, et al. Model of calculating the bond strength between rebars and concrete considering the softening effect of concrete[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2022, 39(9): 234-241.
[32] Yin S P, Hu C, Lv H L, et al. Interfacial properties and bond strength model of TRC-Confined concrete and deformed reinforcement under corrosion[J]. Composite Interfaces, 2019, 26(6): 551-569.
[33] 余鑫. 锈蚀程度对钢筋混凝土抗冻耐久性影响研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2018: 52-65. Yu Xin. Study on the frost durability of reinforced concrete under the degree of corrosion[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2018: 52-65.
[34] JTG 3370.1—2018 公路隧道设计规范[S].
[1] 王振军,刘人太,张庆松,惠冰,陈孟军,马晨阳,李鸿钊. 考虑黏度时空分布的动水扩散数值模拟与试验研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(5): 132-143.
[2] 高艳艳,周童,王旭,高洁,戴荣健. 地方政府和高速公路经营者低碳行为的演化博弈分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2024, 54(4): 150-158.
[3] 赵建锋,李洪一,刘苏文. 基于钢筋锈蚀的RC桥墩抗震性能[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(3): 112-118.
[4] 高智珺, 崔新壮, 隋伟, 郭洪, 刘航, 李长义, 冯洪波. 大型失控车辆与隧道衬砌的动态相互作用与损伤分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(5): 49-57.
[5] 刘洋,葛连升*. 基于新型Padé近似BPM算法的TE模式分析[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(1): 19-23.
[6] 谭青 张魁 夏毅敏 王凯 聂卫. TBM刀具三维破岩仿真[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(6): 72-77.
[7] 焦培刚 周以齐 王喜仓. 自由表面流动的三维SPH数值仿真研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(6): 92-96.
[8] 靖洪文 许国安 曲天智 张春雨. 深井综放沿空掘巷合理支护形式研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(4): 87-91.
[9] 张乐文 李镐 秦杰. 近蚀变带地应力异常分布对岩爆风险强度影响研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(4): 30-33.
[10] 李利平,李术才,徐帮树,丁万涛,蔚立元 . 海底隧道施工设计及其数值优化研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(4): 63-68 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!