JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 179-186.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1672-3961.0.2017.181

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Multiblock local Fisher discriminant analysis for chemical process fault classification

WANG Lei, DENG Xiaogang*, CAO Yuping, TIAN Xuemin   

  1. College of Information and Control Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China
  • Received:2017-04-18 Online:2017-10-20 Published:2017-04-18

Abstract: Fisher discriminant analysis(FDA)was an effective chemical process fault classification method. However, the local data structure information was not investigated within traditional FDA method. To deal with this problem, a multiblock local Fisher discriminant analysis(MLFDA)method was proposed for more effective chemical process fault recognition. This method analyzed the local data structure characteristics from the variable-dimension and sample-dimension. To mine the local information in the variable-dimension, a variable block division method was designed based on the relevancy between the variables and the principal component subspace of the dataset, with which all the variables could be divided into several local variable blocks. Furthermore, considering the characteristics of local sample structure, the local FDA(LFDA)using local weighting factors was applied to construct classifier for each local variable block. An integrating strategy based on weighting classification performance weighting was presented to combine the results from different classifiers. Simulation results on Tennessee Eastman process showed that the proposed MLFDA method had a lower misclassification rate than traditional FDA and LFDA methods.

Key words: local Fisher discriminant analysis, multiblock local Fisher discriminant analysis, fault classification, Fisher discriminant analysis, Tennessee Eastman process

CLC Number: 

  • TP277
[1] QIN S J. Survey on data-driven industrial process monitoring and diagnosis[J]. Annual Reviews in Control, 2012, 36(2):220-234.
[2] GE Z, SONG Z, GAO F. Review of recent research on data-based process monitoring[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(10):3543-3562.
[3] YIN S, LI X, GAO H, et al. Data-based techniques focused on modern industry: an overview[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2015, 62(1):657-667.
[4] DENG X, TIAN X, CHEN S. Modified kernel principal component analysis based on local structure analysis and its application to nonlinear process fault diagnosis[J]. Chemometrics & Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2013, 127(16):195-209.
[5] ZHANG Y, DU W, FAN Y, et al. Process fault detection using directional kernel partial least squares[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(9):2509-2518.
[6] TIAN X, ZHANG X, DENG X, et al. Multiway kernel independent component analysis based on feature samples for batch process monitoring[J]. Neurocomputing, 2009, 72(7-9):1584-1596.
[7] PEP O, CAO Y. Nonlinear dynamic process monitoring using canonical variate analysis and kernel density estimations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial informatics, 2010, 6(1):36-45.
[8] ZHAO S J, ZHANG J, XU Y. Performance monitoring of processes with multiple operating modes through multiple PLS models[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2006, 16(7):763-772.
[9] HUANG H, FENG H, PENG C. Complete local Fisher discriminant analysis with Laplacian score ranking for face recognition[J]. Neurocomputing, 2012, 89(10):64-77.
[10] ZHU Z, SONG Z. A novel fault diagnosis system using pattern classification on kernel FDA subspace[J]. Expert Systems with Application, 2011, 38(6):6895-6905.
[11] ZHONG S, WEN Q, GE Z. Semi-supervised Fisher discriminant analysis model for fault classification in industrial processes[J]. Chemometrics & Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2014, 138:203-211.
[12] JIANG B, ZHU X, HUANG D, et al. A combined canonical variate analysis and Fisher discriminant analysis(CVA—FDA)approach for fault diagnosis[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2015, 77:1-9.
[13] SUGIYAMA M. Dimensionality reduction of multimodal labeled data by local fisher discriminant analysis[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2007, 8(1):1027-1061.
[14] YU J. Localized Fisher discriminant analysis based complex chemical process monitoring[J]. AIChE Journal, 2011, 57(7):1817-1828.
[15] REN S, SONG Z, YANG M, et al. A novel multimode process monitoring method integrating LCGMM with modified LFDA[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2015, 23(12):1970-1980.
[16] VAN M, KANG H. Wavelet kernel local fisher discriminant analysis with particle swarm optimization algorithm for bearing defect classification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation & Measurement, 2015, 64(12):3588-3600.
[17] LI F, WANG J, CHYU M K, et al. Weak fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on feature reduction with Supervised orthogonal local fisher discriminant analysis[J]. Neurocomputing, 2015, 168(C):505-519.
[18] CHIANG L H, RUSSELL E L, BRAATZ R D. Fault detection and diagnosis in industrial systems[M]. London: Springer, 2001.
[19] ADIL M, ABID M, KHAN A Q, et al. Exponential discriminant analysis for fault diagnosis[J]. Neurocomputing, 2016, 171(C):1344-1353.
[20] 张宇, 刘雨东, 计钊. 向量相似度测度方法[J]. 声学技术, 2009, 28(4): 532-536. ZHANG Yu, LIU Yudong, JI Zhao. Vector similarity measurement method[J]. Technical Acoustics, 2009, 28(4):532-536.
[21] DOWNS J J, VOGEL E F. A plant-wide industrial process control problem[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 1993, 17(3):245-255.
[1] CHEN Zhiwen, PENG Tao, YANG Chunhua , HE Zhangming, YANG Chao, YANG Xiaoyue. A fault detection method based on modified canonical correlation analysis [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2017, 47(5): 44-50.
Full text



No Suggested Reading articles found!